The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus to revert to the proposed parenthetical qualifier has been achieved. Happy Publishing! ( closed by page mover)   Paine Ellsworth   ^put'r there  09:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Akaike Station (Nagoya) → Akaike Station (Aichi) – This station is the only station of Nagoya Municipal Subway that not located in Nagoya City. I think it’s inappropriate to name it as Akaike Station (Nagoya). そらみみ ( talk) 05:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC) --Relisted.   Paine Ellsworth   ^put'r there  10:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Relist comment. Members of WikiProjects Trains and Japan have been notified of this relisted debate.   Paine Ellsworth   ^put'r there  10:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Move to Akaike Station (Nagoya Municipal Subway) Akaike Station (Nagoya Railroad) instead, given the precedent with Leander (Capital MetroRail station); in that example, that station is the only Capital MetroRail station to not be located in Austin, Texas even by technicality. ToThAc ( talk) 17:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  This station is not only a station of Nagoya Municipal Subway, but also a Nagoya Railroad station.-- そらみみ ( talk) 20:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  In that case, maybe this page and the other one should be organized by rail system instead ( Akaike Station (Nagaragawa Railway) for the other similarly-named station). ToThAc ( talk) 21:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  So you mean change this page to Akaike Station (Nagoya Municipal Subway & Nagoya Railroad), and the other one become Akaike Station (Nagaragawa Railway)? But it's much longer than the name used now.-- そらみみ ( talk) 18:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  Japanese train systems are obviously more complicated than a new single-line system in Texas. Not a very good reference point, in my view. wbm1058 ( talk) 23:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment. 09:33, 13 August 2015‎ Gryffindor moved page Akaike Station (Aichi) to Akaike Station (Nagoya): be specific about the city. So this is a request to revert a previous move. – wbm1058 ( talk) 23:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  Thanks a lot. I want to revert exactly.-- そらみみ ( talk) 07:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Support move to Akaike Station (Aichi), or better still Akaike station (Aichi) (lower case s) as done in Hong Kong and elsewhere. Although it's not binding in Japan, the logic behind the recent UK discussion applies: follow the name with the largest unambiguous location. Akaike station (Japan) would be insufficient here because of Akaike Station (Gifu), and (Nagoya) is inaccurate, so (Aichi) it is. Certes ( talk) 11:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  In Japan, big letter is often used on entrance or building of a station. Please see File:Nagoya-subway-T20-Akaike-station-entrance-2-20171122.jpg.-- そらみみ ( talk) 13:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Oppose Disambiguated stations either have the city name after it or the line they are on, not the province or state. See Queens Park (London) station as an example or Wall Street (IRT Lexington Avenue Line) or Xinjiekou Station (Beijing). Gryffindor ( talk) 21:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  UK station names generally follow National Rail usage, which is the city in London and a few other major cities but the county elsewhere. So Queens Park (London) but Newport (Essex) for Newport (Essex) railway station, etc. Certes ( talk) 22:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  This station is not in Nagoya City. If using the name of city, it should be named as Akaike Station (Nisshin). I think many people don’t know where this city is.-- そらみみ ( talk) 06:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Support: Standard policy for disambiguation is to use Prefecture > City > Ward. This station is in Aichi Prefecture, and is not even in the city of Nagoya, so the choice of "Nagoya" is totally incorrect. -- DAJF ( talk) 07:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.