This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of
Rome and
ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This page conflicts with a list of Roman festivals that links to it on the subject of when this festival was held. Can someone clear this up? -
Jonas 19:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Original research
The article says "...we would therefore suggest another..." Who is "we"? This reads like an academic paper, and thus original research — is it a quote from someone? --
Jere7my (
talk) 08:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)reply
It's probably copied from one of the three old encyclopedias that are referenced at the bottom of the page.--
Prosfilaes (
talk) 23:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)reply
It would be useful to state the source explicitly: on what grounds can one state the regia was originally on the Quirinal? Thanks.
Aldrasto11 (
talk) 02:48, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply