This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
yeah okay...
It's not true that an asymmetric rhythm could be translated into a simetric rhythm (like : 3+3+2 = 3+2+3), because groupings mean where is the stressed note. Like: 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 (1s being stresses)
I need to go away and think about this but at first the reference to 3+2+3 being regular doesn't sound right. 3+2+3 is just as irregular as 3+3+2. The weak downbeat halfway through the bar doesn't occur at the start of a rhythmic cell in either case...-- Andybak
After having read this article, I still haven't the slightest clue what additive rhythm actually is. - furrykef ( Talk at me) 11:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
A rhythm like 2+2+2+3 can't be made symmetrical just by starting one's count part-way through the sequence. (Try Bartok's Mikrokosmos, No. 152: Dance in Bulgarian Style No. 5.) And even something like 2+2+3, assuming it really constitutes a 7-beat unit, can't be considered symmetrical unless the listener loses count mid-way through the piece. Suggest losing that sentence. Charmii 04:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
The first sentence... doesn't appear to make any sense. Is it missing an "are" somewhere? I'm not sure exactly what its saying so I can't try to fix it. Bitwiseb ( talk) 02:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Do we have any sources, such as in the "Divisive structure in African music" section, which simply and clearly make their points rather than implying their points by arguing how the opposite is wrong? Hyacinth ( talk) 23:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
I think Philip Glass summarized the subject of this article rather concisely in this quote:
http://www.philipglass.com/music/recordings/two_pages.php
Should we include it in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keshidragon ( talk • contribs) 15:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
The above has been removed. Hyacinth ( talk) 10:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Additive rhythm and divisive rhythm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)