This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it uses only footnote references and has been extensively researched and annotated. The content being cited is merely a list of record labels owned by Concord Music Group which is a matter of pubic record. There is no copyrighted material in the article itself and the citation of copyrighted material by way of footnote reference is the an actual requirement of Wikipedia articles. This page contains substantial information which is not duplicated elsewhere on Wikipedia and which is unique to this page and which has been the subject of extensive research and is properly footnoted and referenced. -- HansDieterUlrich ( talk) 22:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) -- Trackinfo ( talk) 01:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
There is significance to the subject. The current writing of the article might be copyvio, I can't defend that though it can be pared down to essential information without being a copyvio. But this vast of a venture, headed by Norman Lear is inherently significant. Trackinfo ( talk) 01:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it represents an extensively researched article with voluminous footnotes and references. It contains no copyrighted material. The Copyvios robot checking program has merely identified that the names of the records labels are the names of the record labels. It has also identified that the names of the recording artists under contract to Concord Music are famous people. Similarly, it has tagged the names of movies in the library of Village Roadshow which by definition will be the same no matter who lists them. The primary document that is being compared is in fact a press release which is quoted and correctly footnoted in the article. The loss of this article will eradicate much useful information which is not readily available anywhere else. What this analysis has done, more than anything else, is demonstrate the shortcomings of the use of robots as decision making tools.-- HansDieterUlrich ( talk) 05:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I would like to add to this comment that the information regarding the ownership of Tractebel from 1989 to 1991 is a material new fact regarding this company which has never appeared in any stories covering this company for the last twenty years at least. HansDieterUlrich ( talk) 05:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Act III Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jazzreview.com/index.php/blues/item/14347When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Act III Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)