This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Occupations ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Hey, this article is off to a great start although I sense a potential problem in the External links section becoming a dumping ground for anyone who has a blog about planning or just advertising. What will determine whether a link deserves to be there or not? Greyfedora 17:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Russell Davies has set up a wiki for planners at plannersphere.com - once it's established a link from this wiki page should link to it. All the planning blogs can be added there. -- Zeroinfluencer 11:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I want to add a link to the relevant area of: www.myninetofive.com ( MyNineToFive_Account_Planner) which is a site that consists of employee generated reviews making it quite appropriate for a link from here. The link was removed from here (and some other professions) but I think that they make a valuable addition in helping people considering entering the profession continue their research in a similar way. --Natasha 81.154.224.36 ( talk) 09:52, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

That would be Spam and that would be a no. CanadianLinuxUser ( talk) 13:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

The wordage is impenetrable, a shame for an article that's supposed to describe a job-function which brings clarity to complex situations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.207.205 ( talk) 12:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Particularly bad is the rambling history section, with its apparently unidentified "two UK pioneers". It adds virtually nothing to the understanding of what planning is and how it developed.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.150.156.248 ( talk) 13:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC) reply