The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I will review this article. This is a long wing, and may take some time to complete this review. I have taken some notes from the previous failed nomination to guide along this review, making sure all valid concerns in the previous review has been addressed. GeraldWL14:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Kew Gardens 613, first check:reply
Concerning
MOS:BOLDLINKAVOID, I think it'd be better if you symbolize stations that meet full ADA requirements with a symbol rather than bolds. Section in question: "Long Island Rail Road" and "Metro-North Railroad".
In "Buses", As of May 2019, all fleet of non-express buses consists of semi-low floors with wheelchair ramps, while all express buses have high floors and contained lifts. Many retired fleet are high-level buses, and many of the fleet built before 1990 do not comply with ADA standards is not cited.
Fixed
"Future accessible stations" bulleted list is uncited.
Doing... Notes [a], [b], and [f] are currently cited. Note [g] is not too hard to cite, since a notation can be added in the "Notes" section. Note [c] is harder, since it's difficult to find a source for an absence of something - however, in all of these articles, there are sources for the elevators, and similar to [g], a notation can be added in the "Notes" section. Note [e] is a legend notation, but it's the same issue as note [c].
Epicgenius (
talk)
23:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Gerald Waldo Luis: Thanks for the comments. Though I'm not the nominator, I've addressed some of these issues. It is slightly harder to address some of the others, because they are intended as legend notations rather than actual prose.
Epicgenius (
talk)
23:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Long Island Rail Road's abbreviation is kept in square brackets. Suggest changing to regular brackets, unless MOS somehow disallows it. GeraldWL14:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)reply
"However, private operators retained non-accessible buses. The last non-accessible bus on any New York City public transit, Motor Coach Industries' Classic (SC40-102A), ran on these private routes (which later became part of MTA Bus Company) until it was retired in 2007." Uncited. GeraldWL12:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Removed
Future accessible stations
"Since December 2020, there are 2 commuter rail and 4 subway stations where ADA renovations are underway; 1 station under construction; and 7 proposed stations across the MTA's commuter rail and rapid transit systems. Four of the stations listed below are already partially accessible. In addition, there are 39 subway stations where final contracts, design or planning is underway (32 if station complexes are counted as one station), as well as 2 commuter rail stations where design is underway. Another 46 subway stations (45 if complexes are counted as one) and 8 commuter rail stations are in pre-planning." Uncited. GeraldWL12:10, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
This is merely a summary of the below table. This has the same problem as the bulleted list: that list was a legend, while the paragraph below it is a summary of the table, which is cited. If necessary, I can condense all 20 or so references and append them to the end of this paragraph.
Epicgenius (
talk)
16:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.