This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Is this story not just a part of the Great Wall of China, another of Kafka's short stories? Sancho 22:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Well,yes but maybe it was delivered somewhere as a stand-alone story and as such would deserve an independant mention.(Its the best part of "The Great Wall of China" as far as I can tell)
New Babylon 2 17:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
I really like it too, maybe my favorite of all of Kafka's writings. It was delivered as a stand-alone story in a sort of introduction section of "The Complete Stories" of Kafka published by Schocken, but I'm not sure if that was the publisher's doing? Or if Kafka actually separated that section himself ever. Sancho 18:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The plot summary sounds suspiciously like the actual thing. Should the title "Plot Summary" be changed to something more along the lines of "The Story"?
Clockwrist (
talk) 23:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)reply
story and translation
First, if this is the whole story it should not be here but in Wikisource. Second, this reference makes no sense:
The Metamorphosis and Other Stories, trans. Donna Freed. New York: Barnes & Noble.
ISBN1-56619-969-7. This story was translated by Ian Johnston
So did Freed translate it or did Johnston? Third, why in the world would anyone use the Barnes & Noble translation instead of the far more widely known and accepted Muir one? I'm very tempted to delete this whole mess and start over.
AshcroftIleum (
talk) 08:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)reply
It's a long time since the above comment was written, but the inclusion of the translated paragraph in its entirety seems to be a clear violation of
copyright. I'll remove it in a few days unless justification is provided.
AndrewWTaylor (
talk) 16:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Come to think of it, there would be virtually nothing left of this article if the quote is deleted, so I'll also redirect it to the main "Great Wall of China" article.
AndrewWTaylor (
talk) 16:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)reply