This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I have just modified one external link on
624th Operations Center. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
It's definitely going to be difficult to figure out either way until we get a current lineage document for the 616th. Question is what the best course of action is going to be until then. –
Recoil (
talk) 09:25, 7 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Actually, reading this
article, it reads "The activation concluded with the unfurling of the 616th OC flag and activation of the newly formed 616th OC" (emphasis mine), it does not say "redesignation" and I think "newly formed" is very important here. Therefore I think we should consider moving the article back to its previous 624th location. –
Recoil (
talk) 09:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Okay, this pushes it over the edge for me: The
video of the activation ceremony of the 616th Operations Center also includes the inactivation ceremonies of the 624th and 625th (starting with the 624th at 33:18). I will modify the article back to where it is just about the 624th and then move it back tonight or tomorrow barring any objections. –
Recoil (
talk) 10:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)reply