This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for
GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : *
Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) *
Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize
Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. *
Sport in the United Kingdom - the
Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The tournament groups likely fail
WP:GNG on their own, as all of the sources in the Group D article discuss the tournament as a whole, not the individual group. Please also see my Articles for creation review at
Draft:2023–24 Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy Group E. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 07:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support. The tournament article itself will not become huge so I see no good reason to have group information in separate articles.
Batagur baska (
talk) 23:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support. Per
WP:NOPAGE. The topic is better covered as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page. ––
FormalDude(talk) 02:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Support: It is no way justified to make separate wiki articles for separate groups. It should be better if it's merged with the main article.
7653godisone (
talk) 12:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Seems like we have a clear consensus to merge, but I'll wait for another editor to close the discussion since I'm
involved. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 15:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Ah, I'd forgotten there was an exception for merge discussions; thanks for the reminder,
Paine Ellsworth! I'll go ahead and perform the merge later today. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 19:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.