The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to
Armenia,
Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
limited circumstances)
The subject of this article is
controversial and content may be in
dispute. When updating the article,
be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a
neutral point of view. Include
citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay
calm and
civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and
do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached,
other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
Second Nagorno-Karabakh War is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
Armenia and
Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Second Nagorno-Karabakh War is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
Artsakh and
Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a
WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with
limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The conflict was accompanied by coordinated attempts to spread misleading content and disinformation via social media and the internet.[166]
What is the point of the disputed remark? Why are you aiming your attack at freedom of information?
151.229.110.67 (
talk) 23:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)reply
I'm sure if it is so obvious that you will be able to give us a reliable source for the claim. Such a source is needed for inclusion of content in this article. --
OuroborosCobra (
talk) 13:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Having Syrian mercenaries is just ridiculous considering Azerbaijan as one of the most irreligious countries in the world and also having 3 times more population than the opponent country and many more military advances. As a citizen, I am extremely offended by this and I find it wrong to add this kind of info without having reliable source and proof.
151.71.255.147 (
talk) 19:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
"change X to Y" format and provide a
reliable source if appropriate. FYI the blue numbers inside the brackets e.g. [4] are sources
Cannolis (
talk) 21:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Pakistan support
Isn't it true that Pakistan provided diplomatic support to Azerbaijan throughout the conflict?
Even in the
Armenia-Pakistan relations article, it mentions this. In 2015, they went as far as to say the recognition of Armenia is contingent on the Armenians leaving the disputed zone. And they openly celebrated and praised the cease-fire when it happened.
OperativePhase33 (
talk) 04:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Dot-points under result parameter
Vanezi Astghik, per
MOS:MIL, which gives voice to the template documentation for the result parameter, additional dot points are not supported. The documentation is quite specific in how it is to be filled.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 11:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm confused, where does it say that in the documentation? And if it's reliably sourced content, why can't we make an exception even if true?
Vanezi (
talk) 06:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)reply
It is quite specific as to what is permitted under the result parameter. It does not includes dot-points.
WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE tells us not to write the article in the infobox and that less is better. This infobox is excessively bloated and such "detail" contributes to this. The infobox is unsuited to prose or prose like statements. That is what the lead is for.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 09:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Articles like
Croatian War of Independence have been promoted to good article with the bullet points. I don't question the GA criteria and if it was good enough for a GA article, it should be here too.
Vanezi (
talk) 08:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
It was listed as a GA in 2011. Things change.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 09:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply