This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
The three promoted teams were Plymouth Argyle, Crewe Alexandra and Swindon Town (as champions). - a style thing - why would you not list them in order of placings?
while had been relegated to the fourth tier and remained there since the 2011–12 season. - err, a subject missing here?
Three minutes in and following a free kick, Watson's shot was blocked by Exeter City - this looks weird using player/club here - it'd be good to find out name(s) of city blockers or just maybe say "'City players"
In the Post-match section, I think the last sentence could be moved to the top of the previous para and make a single para.
Otherwise a fine read with very little to complain about
Cas Liber (
talk·contribs) 05:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Casliber I've addressed all the above, hopefully to your satisfaction. Thanks for picking this up, much obliged. Better get on and nominate some more now...! Cheers.
The Rambling Man (
Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 09:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: So this now just creeps outside the seven days but it was ready to go yesterday (see
here) when the Arbcom amendment received a majority, it just took until today to be formally closed. If we can't IAR on this, I understand.
Improved to Good Article status by
The Rambling Man (
talk). Self-nominated at 11:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC).reply
Whilst technically nominated a day late, due to the extenuating circumstances mentioned, I believe
WP:IAR applies here. We can't expect TRM to have nominated this in time when he was prevented by Arbcom from doing so- to reject this nomination based on being one day over time would be dumb and
pointy in my view
Y Article is long enough (12216 characters), is a GA, article is well sourced, and is within policy. Copyvio tool flags 32% chance of copyvios, but these are all from limited quoting, which is acceptable and not a copyvio
Y ALT0 is short enough, interesting and well cited. Believed to be matches the assertion of the source, so is appropriate here. ALT1 is also short enough, and well cited, but I believe its less interesting
Y QPQ done
Overall this nomination passes, congratulations.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 13:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)reply