2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash (
final version) received a
peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 3 May 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
A fact from 2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 January 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
2020 Coulson Aviation Lockheed C-130 Hercules crash is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New enough (moved to mainspace on the same day of the nomination), has sufficient length, no copyright violation concerns per Earwig. Hook is interesting and sourced, it also appears in the article. Image is freely used, clear, and used in article. No QPQ required–this is the nominator's fourth DYK nomination. Good work on the article! ~
TailsWx 02:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'll place this on hold. Please ping when the above are addressed.
Z1720 (
talk) 15:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Z1720: Thank you so much for your review and sorry for the delay in replying.
I have tried to add to the lede but unfortunately I couldn't find much to add to it. I have looked at other aviation accident FAs and found that an extra paragraph is usually added to the lede when there is more circumstance to the accident (ie. a search, hijacking, etc.). Is there anything else you recommend I add?
I will added an aftermath section momentarily.
about 58 km to the east of Adaminaby. Suggest using the convert template on this to give imperial. Done
Suggest merging the three headings in the "Victims" section to prevent one-paragraph sections, per MOS:OVERSECTION. Done
Information on the foundation created in McBeth's memory should be included. Done
Suggest adding ALT text per MOS:ALT DoneGMH Melbourne (
talk) 14:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
GMH Melbourne: These recommendations are good, but what happened after? Were any of these recommendations put in place, and if so how? The article should describe how this crash changed (or did not change) aviation policy or procedures. There can also be information about its legacy by mentioning the charity set up in one of the victim's memory.
Z1720 (
talk) 14:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Z1720: I have added the aftermath section detailing what has been done since the accident, what policies have changed as a result, and also info about the foundation. Also note I have added a couple of images (all available under Creative Commons + I also added ALTs to them).
GMH Melbourne (
talk) 01:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)reply
After fixing some concerns myself, I can say that this article passes this GAN. Great work.
Z1720 (
talk) 22:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.