This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Hi there, I submitted a draft Draft:2019 Canadian federal election in Ontario several weeks ago, today it was rejected for a reason that violates Precedent on other articles, It was Rejected for the Reason quote "Information in article inconsistent - infobox shows Liberals and Conservatives gaining two seats each, the table below shows different results.", the reason for this difference is me following the precedent that exists on the Main
2019 Canadian Federal Election Page, where the Infobox determines Change in comparison to the seat totals at dissolution, and the table calculates it based off of Seats the Last election. I followed that Precedent in my draft.