This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Ukraine–NATO relations#Euromaidan and beyond|its support for Ukraine]] The anchor (#Euromaidan and beyond) is no longer available because it was
deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Why not on main page?
Resolved
Hi all, given the severity of the ongoing cyberattack thus article should be notable enough for appearing on Main Page's "In the News" section. What's the process to follow to achieve this? Thanks,
DPdH (
talk) 11:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Just seen it in Main Page.
DPdH (
talk) 00:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Quit adding United States, Russia, China, India. etc as the perpetrators. It's all hearsay at the moment.--
2601:3C5:8200:B79:4DD5:21BF:4586:3B0 (
talk) 11:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I agree with this statement. The user reverts all edits claiming 'vandalism' based on absolutely unreliable sources. There is no consensus on this issue from experts. Ukrainian officials should not be considered authorities on cyber matters. Moreover, with their current conflict with Russia, they are obviously biased and prone to point fingers in that direction with no evidence. Moreover, the very same 'source' of this claim says: "Oleksandr Turchynov claimed there were signs of Russian involvement in the June 27 cyberattack, although he did not give any direct evidence". I strongly believe the 'suspect' should be removed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
212.73.233.51 (
talk) 18:30, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
1. The removal of information with the source is vandalism
2. The difference between the suspect and the accused is a big one...
3. Ukraine suffered the most from attacks and the attacks were first directed namely on Ukraine. Official authorities of Ukraine have every right to suspect and links to state websites are reliable sources.
4. It is very interesting to observe when one ip from the Russian Federation supports another ip also from Russian Federation
Flavius1 (
talk) 18:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The article is clearly biased given current political situation. I don't believe Wikipedia should reflect that. How you can claim my IP is from Russia is simply beyond me. It shows nothing but your own bias in this matter. But whatever, do what you want. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
212.73.233.51 (
talk) 19:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
IP is easily checked. The article was not written by me. I just created it. And all the participants who wrote it are biased are not then? No. But when appear anonymous IP from Russia and delete information - this is bias, to my mind!
Flavius1 (
talk) 19:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I'm tracing the previous user's IP to London, UK, so I don't know what
Flavius1 is talking about. He clearly seems to have an axe to grind in this Ukraine/Russia debate. This has no place on wikipedia. Is it too much to ask to stick to established facts? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
96.127.221.45 (
talk) 23:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Not everyone who disagrees with you is from Russia. They just might disagree with you because the have a legit reason too. Also you seem like the only person who keeps adding it back and others have already expressed why it should not be here.--
75.66.124.118 (
talk) 02:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The other users who read the article or wrote it - do not agree with you and do not delete information. Now only dubious anonyms write here one by one and change an IP address with anonymizer made easier. And only they are very interested in it.
Flavius1 (
talk) 08:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I refined information on the suspects according to information of the Ukrainian authorities.
Ukrainian authorities? The ones that claim that either Russia drops nukes on Donbass or sacrifices thousands of troopsdaily? Yeah, that is a very reliable source alright.
93.159.236.12 (
talk) 15:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Read the title of the article "Attacks on Ukraine." Accordingly, if the Ukrainian authorities suspect someone - then this is a reliable source and this should be in the article. If suspected some other country - then it would also be
Flavius1 (
talk) 16:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I saw
Template:Ukrainian crisis transcluded to the bottom of the article. However, why has the article not mentioned the connection between the
Ukrainian crisis and the recent cyber attacks? --
George Ho (
talk) 06:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)reply