![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Overall, article needs to be rewritten and wikified due to numerous grammatical and spelling errors. It also is missing info on candidates and political parties. Viking880 04:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
If somebody knows the resaults for this elections, who won in which municipality, so I can make map of it? Ceha 00:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Some of my comments can be cheched on deletion pages, and as for verifiability and original research;
--
Čeha (
razgovor) 01:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bosnian municipal elections, 1990. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://arhiv.slobodnadalmacija.hr/20000522/podlistak.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Was the caption under the map (and most of the article) done by a color-blind person, someone with serious nationalistic prejudices - or both?
Cause not only is the single non-nationalistic, socialist, party completely marginalized and ignored in the article - it is also labeled as "Serbian" in the caption under the map.
Apparently, back in 2012, someone made a map which presented municipalities won by Bosniak nationalist and Croatian nationalist parties in green and blue respectively - while injecting STRONG prejudices conflating Serbs and socialists.
Both by designating Serbian nationalist and socialist municipalities an ever so slightly different shade of red - AND by mislabeling the Serbian nationalist municipalities won in a 1990 election with a name of a party which wasn't formed until 1996.
But once it WAS formed it WAS Serbian, nominally social-democratic AND very soon it abandoned any socialist pretenses and revealed itself to be extremely nationalist and populist. Though it still has "socialist" in its name.
And while maps changed over time, caption still maintains "Reds are Serbs", both literally and figuratively.
Which is a pretty serious prejudicial conflation in an article about elections which were prologue for a war along those very same ethnic and nationalist divisions.
And which clearly still exist.
Further bias can be gleaned by the single lonely note under the table of "Results", noting that "Nationalistic parties did not win only in Tuzla, Vareš and Novo Sarajevo".
Wow! Really? Well that's some potentially useful "non-information" there. Who did win then, in those municipalities? Those who shall not be named?
Wouldn't that information be more useful than normalizing everything according to nationalists?
And shouldn't those results be in the table too, instead of being relegated to a footnote about "not winning"?
What? Are those municipalities less important than those won by nationalist parties? --
89.146.152.225 (
talk) 11:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)