This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the
scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please
Join,
Create, and
Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. — Film Fan 13:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose No-one typing in "13th" in the search box would expect to find a semi-obscure documentary film as the result, it should go to the number. LugnutsDick Laurent is dead 12:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Fairly obscure documentary against common term used all over the world. Surely not a serious nomination. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 13:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This needs to be fixed: 'The film begins in the hood an audio clip of former President'
The Civil War
In the film, they acted as if the 13th didn't do anything for African Americans. They acted as if it did nothing when thousands or more people died for such a cause to bring us one step closer to equality today.
Somisista (
talk) 02:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support per nomination. Use of uppercase letters is not justified by the occasional stylization (
IMDb,
Rotten Tomatoes,
Facebook…) or even, possibly, on-screen credits, although the appended poster, which uses uppercase "T" and "H", does not even come close to enlarging those two letters to the same size as the number "13".
—Roman Spinner(talk)(contribs) 21:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose - the film title officially has a capital TH. For a reason. We don't call "WALL·E" "Wall-E" and just because some publications didn't get the memo doesn't mean we should play ignorant along with them. — Film Fan 00:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
You say that the title of the film uses a capital "TH" (as opposed to "th") for a reason; if the article discussed that reason citing reliable sources, that might actually be a good rationale for keeping it where it is. However, in my admittedly brief research into the topic, I saw no such explanation for capitalization.
With regards to the Pixar film, the location of that article seems to be dictated by what the preponderance of reliable sources call it. The article is located at WALL-E, not WALL·E, and while 18 of its cited sources do spell the film as Wall-E, 50 of them fully capitalize it.
Lastly,
the English Wikipedia's policy on article titles says, "Article titles are based on how
reliable English-language sources refer to the article's subject." I don't want to enumerate
that policy's five principal criteria for naming articles (though I find the lowercased ordinal suffix article title better fits them), but I will quote the next section which says, "Wikipedia generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of
independent, reliable English-language sources) as such names will usually best fit the
criteria listed above." So, if the reliable sources that discuss this film refer to it as 13th, then yes, we will "play ignorant along with them." — fourthords |
=Λ= | 03:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Just for the record, WALL-E is an acronym, so per
MOS:TM its title is appropriate.
Nohomersryan (
talk) 15:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Support move per nom and Roman, plus
WP:MOSCAPS and other miscellaneous policies. To make it short, there is no way
13TH (film) is an acceptable name for the page. ONR (talk) 13:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. This film's title is obviously meant to be "13th" and there is no reason to capitalize the TH per WP policy.
Nohomersryan (
talk) 15:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Support per
MOS:ALLCAPS, "Reduce text written in all capitals in trademarks." This is further supported by
MOS:TMRULES, "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization practices, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting 'official', as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one," with examples like Time over TIME and ASUS over Asus.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me) 17:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Support per the above-cited MOS issues. There is also the fact that the current title resulted from an undiscussed move, so the default outcome should be to revert that move. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 18:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
13th (film). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.