(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline;
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2]
would you have a look at the invasion section? I'm not sure who Morse is, and the action description is confusing. Perhaps shorter sentences. Links to main article?
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Notes
Result
Given the conversations we are having about other WWII articles, are you satisfied that the Japanese perspective has been covered?
Undetermined
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute.
Notes
Result
principally one editor
Pass
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
images,
video, or
audio:
Criteria
Notes
Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)
all tagged and free
Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)
captions present
Pass
Result
Result
Notes
Pass
pending editor's review of questions raised about clarity in section 1
Discussion
I mentioned Morse in the 'Organization' section. Could you kindly point out some of the sentences that you find problematic?
Kges1901 (
talk) 20:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)reply
I see it now. first sentence of Japanese invasion is confusing. Maybe break into two?
auntieruth(talk) 16:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
I have reduced the size of the sentence, I don't think that the report itself matters.
Kges1901 (
talk) 17:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The Japanese perspective has been covered since the US official history I used as a source incorporated material gained from Japanese documents after the end of the war.
Kges1901 (
talk) 21:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Additional notes
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the
Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and
sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.