Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at
Help:Related changes.
diffhistNew York City 12:50+1,904
Castncoottalkcontribs (That’s categorically untrue. It’s already been edited and re-edited. Look at the talk page, that explains everything. Please don’t remove sourced material without a specific explanation pertaining to that particular statement.)Tags: UndoDisambiguation links added
diffhistSisters of Life 23:35+60
Avatar317talkcontribs ("pro-life" --> "anti-abortion" : more descriptive and accurate terminology as standardly used throughout Wikipedia - Please see
Talk:Anti-abortion movements/FAQ Q: "Should this article's title be pro-life movement?" A: No. Wikipedia does not use euphemisms. The term "pro-life" is a branding or marketing device and does not reflect the sole focus of the movement, which is opposition to abortion. The fact that the two sides officially call themselves "pro-life" and "pro-choice" is not a reaso)Tag: Undo