Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at
Help:Related changes.
diffhistPearson Education 13:40−32
150.250.120.180talk (no study sourced for claim removed, the BBC article cited doesn’t include any sources that link a study demonstrating that “younger generations prefer digital books” over hard copy books; also added how the lower cost is normally for the company rather than the consumer.)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
diffhistMughal Empire 09:35+98
Curious man123talkcontribs (Undid revision
1220014701 by
PadFoot2008 (
talk) These are the established facts on Wiki itself, for these info consensus are already there. There are ample cited ref for this on all those articles. We do not need consensus everytime to add factual info in infobox. And pls if you do revert these, explain it with ref on what basis you are saying these arnt imp fact to be mentioned for an imp art as you said)Tags: UndoReverted
diffhistMughal Empire 08:42+98
Curious man123talkcontribs (Undid revision
1220007459 by
PadFoot2008 (
talk) These state were de facto independent state after 1719 or at some years later and were treaty as an independent. The fact that you mention Nizam or Nawab are title of the ruler and not for the administratior of the province. There are many sourves cited on there respective article.)Tags: UndoReverted
diffhistMughal Empire 07:18−98
PadFoot2008talkcontribs (Undid revision
1219922307 by
Curious man123 (
talk) This is a popular article. Please use the talk page to discuss changes to the infobox. The states you have added weren't sovereign. Nawab, Subah, and Nizam are terms related to "province" or governate not a kingdom.)Tags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit