Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at
Help:Related changes.
diffhistOneida people 20:36−111
Brusquedandeliontalkcontribs (unsourced content added by IP editor https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Oneida_people&diff=prev&oldid=178861021&title=Oneida_people&diffonly=1)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
diffhistCayuga people 20:33−21
Brusquedandeliontalkcontribs (unsourced content added by IP editor https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Cayuga_people&diff=prev&oldid=178861374&title=Cayuga_people&diffonly=1)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
diffhistSeneca people 20:31−26
Brusquedandeliontalkcontribs (unsourced content added by IP editor https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Seneca_people&diff=prev&oldid=178860605&title=Seneca_people&diffonly=1)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
diffhistPalestinian Americans 17:03−268
TheCuratingEditortalkcontribs (A)The latest edit on "History of Pal in Los Angeles should be read" . B) Pal-Arab national identity during the Mandate was indeed convoluted while having a "Pal" component . Contrary to uncritical takes the term was used as an endonym by Pal Arabs at the time , sometimes even before the Mandate . Documents such as newspapers, and others quoted by Porath , Muslih , Foster substantiate the case for continuity in national terminology as to include "Pal Jews" , as stated on the March 28th edit .)Tag: Visual edit
diffhistHaitian Americans 15:16+3,355
64.189.239.35talk (Initiated the compilation of Haitian-Americans in media, rectified prior grammatical errors, and verified statistical data with accurate information available.)Tag: Visual edit
diffhistAmerican (word) 04:29−12
CAVincenttalkcontribs (the argument that "American" should apply to more than just the US is one that continues to be made, as a glance at the talk page or edit history will show! (To be clear, I use the term as it is commonly used in English; I just don't think the lead should state that the only objections occurred in the past.))