User contributions for DerAnsager
A user with 32 edits. Account created on 15 February 2014.
24 October 2016
- 18:4218:42, 24 October 2016 diff hist +2 User talk:DerAnsager →October 2016
- 18:4218:42, 24 October 2016 diff hist +359 User talk:DerAnsager →October 2016
- 18:1518:15, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel It's not a negative claim, it is just a objective report based upon objective sources, all other wikis mention it also, especially the german one
- 18:1218:12, 24 October 2016 diff hist −1,652 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
- 18:0718:07, 24 October 2016 diff hist +184 User talk:DerAnsager →Markus Gabriel
- 18:0518:05, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel unbased revision because it is well sourced by an official paper
- 17:0017:00, 24 October 2016 diff hist +95 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
- 16:5316:53, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel What counts as a reliable source [...] The type of the work (some examples include a document, an article, or a book) Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
- 16:5116:51, 24 October 2016 diff hist +409 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
- 16:1416:14, 24 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel The investigation of the ombudsman is the secondary reliable source you're looking for and if a public institution is involved in a case, it becomes a public issue and is worth mentioning
- 16:1116:11, 24 October 2016 diff hist +169 User talk:DerAnsager →Markus Gabriel
21 October 2016
- 18:3918:39, 21 October 2016 diff hist +848 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
18 October 2016
- 01:2801:28, 18 October 2016 diff hist −1 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
- 01:2701:27, 18 October 2016 diff hist +98 User talk:DerAnsager No edit summary
- 01:2601:26, 18 October 2016 diff hist +446 User talk:DerAnsager →Markus Gabriel
- 00:0300:03, 18 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel from a neutral point of view, we should at least mention that the controversy occurred and that the discussion still goes on. The sources cited are objective (both sides) and reliable (Official public paper). I think they meet the standards
17 October 2016
- 23:3723:37, 17 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel Undid revision 744871328 by EricEnfermero (talk) it is an ongoing debate between an accredited philosopher and a renowned university
- 23:0623:06, 17 October 2016 diff hist +658 Markus Gabriel Added the section "Controversy" including sources
19 July 2016
- 05:3405:34, 19 July 2016 diff hist +141 m Liam Hemsworth Present picture of Liam Hemsworth added
13 July 2014
- 00:2600:26, 13 July 2014 diff hist −391 m Intelligent design "pseudoscientific" is a judgemental word. hypothesis is a more neutral term
10 May 2014
- 12:0012:00, 10 May 2014 diff hist −75 m Timeline of Western philosophers contemporary philosophy
3 May 2014
- 23:0723:07, 3 May 2014 diff hist +4 m New realism (philosophy) No edit summary
- 23:0623:06, 3 May 2014 diff hist +25 m Timeline of Western philosophers No edit summary
- 23:0423:04, 3 May 2014 diff hist +50 Timeline of Western philosophers No edit summary
- 21:1421:14, 3 May 2014 diff hist +34 m Steven Pinker en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins_Award
8 April 2014
4 April 2014
- 14:0414:04, 4 April 2014 diff hist +207 Talk:Charles Darwin →Influenced: Karl Marx: new section
19 March 2014
- 16:0916:09, 19 March 2014 diff hist +386 Markus Gabriel http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/gvacariu/Did%20Markus%20Gabriel%20plagiarized%20my%20ideas.pdf and a youtube video of him youtube.com/watch?v=WLpzaaSE8L8
- 16:0016:00, 19 March 2014 diff hist 0 Markus Gabriel the philosophy of Markus Gabriel shares significant similarities with Naïve realism
28 February 2014
- 02:1302:13, 28 February 2014 diff hist +18 N User:DerAnsager ←Created page with 'Ish bin ain anzaga' current
- 02:0902:09, 28 February 2014 diff hist −118 Markus Gabriel No edit summary
- 02:0902:09, 28 February 2014 diff hist +940 N Markus Gabriel translation of the german articel http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Gabriel
