A user with 45 edits. Account created on 27 July 2007.
22 June 2009
04:2104:21, 22 June 2009diffhist−51
December 27
Operation Cast Lead killed more civilans, and destroyed far more civilian infrastructure, than Hamas fighters and Hamas infrastructure. To imply that the bombardment targeted only Hamas is false.
03:1103:11, 30 January 2008diffhist−750
Unlawful combatant
Rama: a primary source of international law is the customary law of nations, including that of the U.S. If you want to discuss this, please put something on the talk page.
29 January 2008
19:1619:16, 29 January 2008diffhist−750
Unlawful combatant
Undo last edit. Philip, don't be silly. According to your position, the French resistance had no privileged or legal basis for opposing the Nazi occupation of France.
04:4304:43, 29 January 2008diffhist−728
Pierre Rehov
It appears that J-bou is up to his/her/its old tricks again. Now listen carefully, b/c I'm only going to say this another thousand times or so: partisan cheerleading violates NPOV, got that?
04:3204:32, 29 January 2008diffhist−664
Unlawful combatant
rm ICRC reference asserting that civilians have no lawful or privileged right to self defense (see previous edit); ICRC is not a primary source of international law
04:2404:24, 29 January 2008diffhist−86
Unlawful combatant
Art. 51 of UN Charter explicitly recognizes inherent right of individual or collective self-defense to armed attack. Therefore, such self defense is neither unlawful, nor unprivileged.
23:5023:50, 11 January 2008diffhist+669
Unlawful combatant
rm lead-in assertion (civilian engaged in hostilities = unlawful enemy combatant). Because Int'l Law recognizes that all civilians have right of self-defense, such self defense cannot be unlawful.
07:2107:21, 1 December 2007diffhist+152
Woodstock
Fixing Townshend quote (please, no reverts. If you listen to the audio, and still can't tell "fuck off" from "back off," then you either haven't mastered the English language, or your hearing's gone)
02:5602:56, 13 August 2007diffhist−58
Pierre Rehov
Apparently, Ynhockey and Jaakobou would rather play games than respond to the issue at hand, as to which I have CLEARLY and REPEATEDLY stated my position on the discussion page.
8 August 2007
00:3300:33, 8 August 2007diffhist−58
Pierre Rehov
Jaakobou: No need for the warning. Your antics and your reputation precede you. I've stated my position on the talk page, so please stop pretending that you can't see it.