13:4713:47, 27 May 2020diffhist+71
User talk:PPEMES
→TfD nominations: Asking if the user has any suggestion of a gadget I can active on my preferences with can provide better edit summaries that the gadget I did active which only provides "Common edit summaries" including "Reply", "Comment" and "Suggestion", which I though sufficed
13:4313:43, 27 May 2020diffhist+5
User talk:PPEMES
Making a minor correction in grammatics in forementioned message posted on by me (PPEMES) on my user talk page, in response to a complaint by user Fram about less than satisfying edit summaries in conjunction with templates for discussion proposals
13:4013:40, 27 May 2020diffhist+1,253
User talk:PPEMES
→TfD nominations: Replying a user which insisted that my improved summaries in areas where I proposed content improvements did still not satisfy the full expectations of the the more critical elements of the edit summary audience here on Wikipedia.
13:2513:25, 27 May 2020diffhist+338
User talk:PPEMES
I (meaning PPEMES) replied to the Wikipedia user Fram upon a post that was published on my discussion page on Wikipedia. The message stated: "I told you that I tried to accomodate the request by the edit summary "suggestion" when adding new nominations. None has complained over that before you did? That edit summaries are required elsewhere, such as in actualy templates, would be news to me?" I then pressed the "Publish changes" button in order to get the message published onto the page.