A user with 143 edits. Account created on 22 September 2019.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) ( 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 June 2024

16 June 2024

13 June 2024

5 June 2024

4 May 2024

1 May 2024

27 April 2024

24 April 2024

28 March 2024

14 March 2024

23 February 2024

11 February 2024

7 February 2024

26 January 2024

  • 20:35 20:35, 26 January 2024 diff hist −29 Course of FreedomIm afraid it isn't purely left-wing, many sources don't place it there and others don't place it at all on the spectrum, and neither does the party itself. In the Talk page there seems to be no editors active to reach a consensus yet, so it's best to leave the infobox without it. The Ideology page does the job of describing it anyway. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

31 December 2023

30 December 2023

25 November 2023

  • 08:07 08:07, 25 November 2023 diff hist +90 Course of FreedomUndid revision 1185458723 by Snarcky1996 ( talk) Why was this removed? Radical is used as an adjective inside the article to descr. the party's positions and its placement on the radical part of the spectrum, hence it links to Radical politics rather than the (classical) Radicalism article. I only used the word Radicalism for shortcut, not for alluding to the 1900 ideol. , but you could write "radical politics" itself for precision.

23 September 2023

15 September 2023

13 September 2023

  • 01:50 01:50, 13 September 2023 diff hist −352 Course of FreedomShould I remove it until a consensus is reached? Because there hasn't been a consensus for "left wing" either, it has been put kind of arbitrarily there, on top of the fact that the sources cited mention it as -Nominally- left, which may be changing the meaning. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 September 2023

10 September 2023

7 September 2023

6 September 2023

2 July 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) ( 20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)