A user with 12,452 edits. Account created on 4 August 2003.
29 March 2009
- 01:44 01:44, 29 March 2009 diff hist +3,572 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
26 March 2009
- 21:31 21:31, 26 March 2009 diff hist +358 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 06:24 06:24, 26 March 2009 diff hist −7,560 User talk:Martinphi No edit summary
12 January 2009
- 21:34 21:34, 12 January 2009 diff hist +312 User talk:Martinphi →In the email
- 21:33 21:33, 12 January 2009 diff hist +5,626 User talk:Martinphi →In the email
- 19:37 19:37, 12 January 2009 diff hist +51 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 18:47 18:47, 12 January 2009 diff hist +124 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 18:46 18:46, 12 January 2009 diff hist +450 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 18:43 18:43, 12 January 2009 diff hist +68 User talk:Martinphi →Indefinite block
- 06:31 06:31, 12 January 2009 diff hist −173 Neale Donald Walsch →Criticism: Sources first
- 06:15 06:15, 12 January 2009 diff hist +326 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Why Wikipedia cannot claim the earth is flat
- 03:38 03:38, 12 January 2009 diff hist +591 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Exceptional claims: Reply to Scientizzle
- 03:35 03:35, 12 January 2009 diff hist +707 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Exceptional claims
- 02:19 02:19, 12 January 2009 diff hist +5 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:18 02:18, 12 January 2009 diff hist +398 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:14 02:14, 12 January 2009 diff hist +285 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:13 02:13, 12 January 2009 diff hist +645 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:04 02:04, 12 January 2009 diff hist +11 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 02:02 02:02, 12 January 2009 diff hist +868 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 01:54 01:54, 12 January 2009 diff hist +443 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 01:44 01:44, 12 January 2009 diff hist +785 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 01:31 01:31, 12 January 2009 diff hist +828 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Fringe science vs. pseudoscience
- 01:23 01:23, 12 January 2009 diff hist +842 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 01:13 01:13, 12 January 2009 diff hist +3,051 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Wording is too open for interpretation
- 00:03 00:03, 12 January 2009 diff hist +22 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Debunking: Correct a minor mistake
11 January 2009
- 22:44 22:44, 11 January 2009 diff hist +1,084 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: The ArbCom is allowing Original Research---at this point they are creating policy
- 22:37 22:37, 11 January 2009 diff hist +370 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires
- 22:32 22:32, 11 January 2009 diff hist +605 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:57 06:57, 11 January 2009 diff hist +133 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:55 06:55, 11 January 2009 diff hist +414 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:51 06:51, 11 January 2009 diff hist +974 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Mentorship
- 06:13 06:13, 11 January 2009 diff hist +151 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Tiny example
- 06:11 06:11, 11 January 2009 diff hist −122 Cold reading Rv -this is a WP:BLP violation, as well as heavy POV
- 06:00 06:00, 11 January 2009 diff hist +825 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires: tiny example of debunking. Little case study, though I could give dozens, worse
- 03:52 03:52, 11 January 2009 diff hist −284 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires
- 03:51 03:51, 11 January 2009 diff hist +784 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →On remedy 7 and stoking fires
- 01:50 01:50, 11 January 2009 diff hist +424 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →comment to Martinphi
- 01:47 01:47, 11 January 2009 diff hist +744 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop →Comment: If it's going to be a contest, and it is, why not have rules and make it work for the good of the encyclopedia?
- 01:27 01:27, 11 January 2009 diff hist +213 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Further: Please note also that you just wrote the last section of the table into this ArbCom
- 01:19 01:19, 11 January 2009 diff hist −83 m Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Evidence presented by User:DGG
- 01:14 01:14, 11 January 2009 diff hist +625 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Advocacy
- 01:07 01:07, 11 January 2009 diff hist +327 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Remedy 5
- 01:06 01:06, 11 January 2009 diff hist +2 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Further
- 01:04 01:04, 11 January 2009 diff hist +1,305 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence →Unfinished!: I think policy is fine the way it is and the last thing I want to do is change it.
- 00:45 00:45, 11 January 2009 diff hist −1 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
- 00:43 00:43, 11 January 2009 diff hist +960 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
- 00:32 00:32, 11 January 2009 diff hist +743 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: My position on policy has been to be a stick-in-the-mud along with a bunch of other editors like Blueboar and Vassyana, and say there is no change necessary
- 00:28 00:28, 11 January 2009 diff hist +365 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Comments
10 January 2009
- 23:34 23:34, 10 January 2009 diff hist +632 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
- 23:31 23:31, 10 January 2009 diff hist +1,066 Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision →Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed
