18:3918:39, 8 February 2013diffhist−172
Myanmar
→Civil War: removed unrelated text on global violence in the name is Islam. Reordered text of section and added dates and links to the commentators mentioned which seem very strange.
22:2622:26, 28 January 2013diffhist−15
Myanmar
Changed title from debate to praise for government reforms as the section provides only praise and no debate about the impact of the reforms.
11:2411:24, 15 January 2013diffhist0
Kachin conflict
Don't change this stat, it's what the source says. not 6,300 not 3,300, just 300. If you find other figures, include them but that is what this source says.
13 January 2013
11:0111:01, 13 January 2013diffhist+31
Kachin conflict
I reread the article. It never says 6,300. it does state "More than 300 government soldiers have been killed in fighting in Kachin state since the beginning of the year, according to Burma army sources." That's it.
9 January 2013
21:3921:39, 9 January 2013diffhist+109
N
User:Hazelmelba2
←Created page with '{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Members/User WPMILHIST Southeast Asian military history task force}}'
19:4719:47, 7 January 2013diffhist−98
Kachin conflict
saying that a source is not reliable is not based on its logo. I will not use biased sources but I would like to see proof that the events reported are being falsified. Provide this and I not use them. Kachin news seems to be accurate in its reporting.
19:4419:44, 7 January 2013diffhist+587
Kachin conflict
kept unknown but added govt.'s own admission of losses and the KIA's claims as they are the only figures available and as this shows a balance.
16:2416:24, 7 January 2013diffhist−99
Kachin conflict
Undid revision 531771679 by
203.81.175.247 Please use the talk page to indicate what on this page is out of date, biased or unreliable. You cannot simple place these tags because you dislike the information on page
10:2310:23, 7 January 2013diffhist−99
Kachin conflict
The Burmese user is probably working for the govt. and is hired to go out and attempt to discredit this page. They have not shown how any of the information on the page is representing a onesided view point, is of date or lacks refs.
6 January 2013
21:5321:53, 6 January 2013diffhist−57
Kachin conflict
user has no specified what is out of date or any part of the article were a viewpoint is expressed without citation. This article was just cited for its high level of contribution, 203.81.175.247 state what your problem is.
21:4621:46, 6 January 2013diffhist+4,379
Myanmar
Undid revision 531644177 by
203.81.175.247 (
talk) user has gone out of their way to disrupt the conversation on this page, they promote their view and delete cited contributions. STOP!!