22:2322:23, 1 August 2018diffhist−343
Ayodhya
Undid revision 853010640 by
Utcursch (
talk) It does glorify the thought of city as fake, such concern has already been addressed bellow in history section, should not be in first line which seems complete POV. And the current city IS ancient as it has written history of more than 2000 years.Tag: Undo
18:5018:50, 1 August 2018diffhist−343
Ayodhya
Undid revision 852922147 by
Kautilya3 (
talk) both side of views are completely detailed In article. Putting controversial one sided view and calling the city fake in very first line is not neutral at all.Tag: Undo