00:5100:51, 24 December 2022diffhist0
2022 alleged plot to kill Coutts RCMP officers
Cont.. You have made reference to other “titles”, that are aloud due, to their prevalence in relevant sources. You will need to post sources that “terrorist plot” is considered common enough that it falls under this stipulation. Wiki: Biography of Living Person -note: it is written into this section that it’s purpose is to avoid libel. Defamation (sourceless points of view such as “terrorism plot”) is addressed quite clearly. At no point were you threatened legallyTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:4900:49, 24 December 2022diffhist+18
2022 alleged plot to kill Coutts RCMP officers
The following infractions have been noted regarding the title Wiki: Verifiability Wiki: Neutral Point of View -note: I have made an edit of facts with no bias on your title. I am not the author and therefor my personal bias is not relevant. However, without sources for your title, you are posing a bias. Wiki: Title -note: it is inappropriate to use this title as it is not at all used else where (from reputable sources) in reference to the subject.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:0200:02, 24 December 2022diffhist+18
2022 alleged plot to kill Coutts RCMP officers
You will need to post the source behind the implication of a terrorist plot before I stop making this edit. The terms and conditions on Wikipedia regarding biographies of living people is quite clear. They have policies in place to avoid libel accusations. Regardless of my bias, if you can’t post a source that backs up your title…you are in violation of the policy.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
23 December 2022
23:3223:32, 23 December 2022diffhist+21
2022 alleged plot to kill Coutts RCMP officers
This is a biography of living people. The title implies that they are being accused of terrorism. They are not. They are being accused of conspiracy to commit murder. There is a very big difference between the two. These men are actively seeking a fair trial where the public hasn’t been swayed by misinformation. This title impedes on that right. I am directly speaking on behalf of the accused families. We are watching for libel and this title, we believe, constitutes libel.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit