Home
Editing filter 172 (see also a
graph
of recent actions)
Filter parameters
Filter ID:
172
Description:
(publicly viewable)
Filter hits:
1,251,679 hits
Statistics:
Of the last 179,515 actions, this filter has matched 87 (0.05%). On average, its run time is 0.14 ms, and it consumes 1.3 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions:
(
documentation
)
!"confirmed" in user_groups & length(added_lines) < 1 & page_namespace == 0 & ( ( rmwhitespace(removed_lines) rlike "==\w+==" & ( rmwhitespace(old_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + "==") & ! rmwhitespace(new_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + "==") ) ) | ( rmwhitespace(old_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace("==" + removed_lines + "==") & ! rmwhitespace(new_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + "==") ) )
!"confirmed" in user_groups & length(added_lines) < 1 & page_namespace == 0 & ( ( rmwhitespace(removed_lines) rlike "==\w+==" & ( rmwhitespace(old_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + "==") & ! rmwhitespace(new_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + "==") ) ) | ( rmwhitespace(old_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace("==" + removed_lines + "==") & ! rmwhitespace(new_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + "==") ) )
Notes:
This seems to work to see section blanking, testing as log only to see if it gives false positives and for speed. OK, added basic check if the removed_text does contain "==", this line could maybe be made better by using a regex on it to check if it is "== sectiontitle ==" ..?? Reenabled, it still may give some false positives. --Beetstra Speedup, specificity --Beetstra bit upgrade? --Beetstra Small case tag, for consistency with other tags. -x null edit, small case change didn't get through - Cen trying to deactivate and reactivate - Cen tagged edits are not reassigned after rename, see bugzilla 18908 - Cen (added_lines == "") does not work, (length(added_lines) < 1) does .. curiously. Updating filter --Beetstra False positives on removing empty sections can we test for that? Crudely even old_wikitext contains [^=](==+) *\n\1[^=] (i.e. it had at least one empty section) might do the job. Rich Farmbrough. Encountered another form of blanking, attempted to add to filter --Beetstra Format. -DF
Flags:
Hide details of this filter from public view
Enable this filter
I understand that details of this filter will be hidden from users who cannot see [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:AbuseFilter/Rules_format#Protected_variables protected variables]
Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:
10:24, 12 November 2019
by
Zzuuzz
(
talk
|
contribs
)
History:
View this filter's history
Tools:
Export this filter to another wiki
{"data":{"rules":"!\"confirmed\" in user_groups \u0026\r\nlength(added_lines) \u003C 1 \u0026\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026\r\n(\r\n (\r\n rmwhitespace(removed_lines) rlike \"==\\w+==\" \u0026\r\n (\r\n rmwhitespace(old_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + \"==\") \u0026\r\n ! rmwhitespace(new_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + \"==\") \r\n )\r\n ) | \r\n (\r\n rmwhitespace(old_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(\"==\" + removed_lines + \"==\") \u0026\r\n ! rmwhitespace(new_wikitext) contains rmwhitespace(removed_lines + \"==\")\r\n )\r\n)","name":"Section blanking","comments":"This seems to work to see section blanking, testing as log only to see if it gives false positives and for speed.\r\n\r\nOK, added basic check if the removed_text does contain \"==\", this line could maybe be made better by using a regex on it to check if it is \"== sectiontitle ==\" ..??\r\n\r\nReenabled, it still may give some false positives. --Beetstra\r\n\r\nSpeedup, specificity --Beetstra\r\nbit upgrade? --Beetstra\r\n\r\nSmall case tag, for consistency with other tags. -x\r\n\r\nnull edit, small case change didn't get through - Cen\r\n\r\ntrying to deactivate and reactivate - Cen\r\n\r\ntagged edits are not reassigned after rename, see bugzilla 18908 - Cen\r\n\r\n(added_lines == \"\") does not work, (length(added_lines) \u003C 1) does .. curiously.\r\n\r\nUpdating filter --Beetstra\r\nFalse positives on removing empty sections can we test for that? Crudely even\r\nold_wikitext contains [^=](==+) *\\n\\1[^=]\r\n(i.e. it had at least one empty section) might do the job.\r\nRich Farmbrough.\r\n\r\nEncountered another form of blanking, attempted to add to filter --Beetstra\r\n\r\nFormat. -DF","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["Section blanking"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"privacylevel":0,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["Section blanking"]}}
Actions to take when matched
Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit
Number of actions to allow:
Period of time (in seconds):
Group throttle by:
user
See
the documentation on mediawiki.org
.
Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning
System message to use for warning:
abusefilter-warning
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Prevent the user from performing the action in question
System message to use for disallowing:
abusefilter-disallowed
Other message
Page name of other message:
(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)
Show/Hide preview of selected message
Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status
Tag the edit in contributions lists and page histories
Tags to apply:
(see
Wikipedia:Tags
for use and formatting)
(please don't rename a tag here, see link above)
(one per line, no commas, publicly visible)
Section blanking