The history of the alphabet goes back to the consonantal writing system used to write
Semitic languages in the
Levant during the 2nd millennium BCE. Nearly all
alphabetic scripts used throughout the world today ultimately go back to this Semitic script.[1] Its first origins can be traced back to a
Proto-Sinaitic script developed in
Ancient Egypt to represent the language of Semitic-speaking workers and slaves in Egypt.[2] Unskilled in the complex hieroglyphic system used to write the
Egyptian language, which required a large number of pictograms, they selected a small number of those commonly seen in their surroundings to
describe the sounds, as opposed to the semantic values, of their own
Canaanite language.[3][4] This script was partly influenced by the older Egyptian
hieratic, a cursive script related to
Egyptian hieroglyphs.[5][6] The Semitic alphabet became the ancestor of multiple writing systems across the Middle East, Europe, northern Africa, and Pakistan, mainly through
Ancient South Arabian,[7]Phoenician and the closely related
Paleo-Hebrew alphabet, and later
Aramaic (derived from the Phoenician alphabet) and the
Nabatean—derived from the Aramaic alphabet and developed into the
Arabic alphabet—five closely related members of the Semitic family of scripts that were in use during the early first millennium BCE.
Some modern authors distinguish between consonantal alphabets, with the term abjad coined for them in 1996, and "true alphabets" with letters for both consonants and vowels. In this narrower sense, the first true alphabet would be the
Greek alphabet, which was adapted from the Phoenician alphabet. Many linguists are skeptical of the value of wholly separating the two categories.
Latin, the most widely used alphabet today,[8] in turn derives from the
Etruscan and Greek alphabets, themselves derived from Phoenician.
Predecessors
Two scripts are well attested from before the end of the fourth millennium BCE:
Mesopotamian cuneiform and
Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Hieroglyphs were employed in three ways in Ancient Egyptian texts: as logograms (ideograms) that represent a word denoting an object visually depicted by the hieroglyph, as phonographs denoting sounds, or as determinatives which provide clues to meaning without directly writing sounds.[9] Since vowels were mostly unwritten, the
hieroglyphs which indicated a single consonant could have been used as a consonantal alphabet, or abjad. This was not done when writing the Egyptian language, but seems to have been an influence on the creation of the first alphabet (used to write a Semitic language).[10] All subsequent alphabets around the world have either descended from this first Semitic alphabet, or have been inspired by one of its descendants by
stimulus diffusion, with the possible exception of the
Meroitic alphabet, a 3rd-century BCE adaptation of hieroglyphs in
Nubia to the south of Egypt. The
Rongorongo script of
Easter Island may also be an independently invented alphabet, but too little is known of it to be certain.[11]
Consonantal alphabets
Semitic alphabet
The
Proto-Sinaitic script of Egypt has yet to be fully deciphered. However, it may be alphabetic and probably records the
Canaanite language. The oldest examples are found as
graffiti in the
Wadi el-Hol and date to
c. 1850 BCE.[12] The table below shows hypothetical prototypes of the
Phoenician alphabet in Egyptian hieroglyphs. Several correspondences have been proposed with Proto-Sinaitic letters.
This Semitic script adapted Egyptian hieroglyphs to write consonantal values based on the first sound of the Semitic name for the object depicted by the hieroglyph, the "acrophonic principle".[13] For example, the hieroglyph per 'house' was used to write the sound [
b] in Semitic, because [
b] was the first sound in the Semitic word bayt 'house'.[14] Little of this proto-Canaanite script has survived, but existing evidence suggests it retained its pictographic nature for half a millennium until it was adopted for governmental use in Canaan.[15] The first Canaanite states to make extensive use of the alphabet were the
Phoeniciancity-states and so later stages of the Canaanite script are called
Phoenician. The Phoenician cities were maritime states at the center of a vast trade network and soon the Phoenician alphabet spread throughout the Mediterranean. Two variants of the Phoenician alphabet had major impacts on the history of writing: the
Aramaic alphabet and the
Greek alphabet.[16]
Descendants of the Aramaic abjad
The Phoenician and Aramaic alphabets, like their Egyptian prototype, represented only consonants, a system called an abjad. The Aramaic alphabet, which evolved from the Phoenician in the 7th century BCE, to become the official script of the
Persian Empire, appears to be the ancestor of nearly all the modern alphabets of Asia except India:
By at least the 8th century BCE the Greeks borrowed the Phoenician alphabet and adapted it to their own language,[19] creating in the process the first "true" alphabet, in which vowels were accorded equal status with consonants. According to Greek legends transmitted by
Herodotus, the alphabet was brought from Phoenicia to Greece by
Cadmus. The letters of the Greek alphabet are the same as those of the Phoenician alphabet, and both alphabets are arranged in the same order.[19] However, whereas separate letters for vowels would have actually hindered the legibility of Egyptian, Phoenician, or Hebrew, their absence was problematic for Greek, where
vowels played a much more important role.[20] The Greeks used for vowels some of the Phoenician letters representing consonants which weren't used in Greek speech. All of the names of the letters of the Phoenician alphabet started with consonants, and these consonants were what the letters represented; this is called the
acrophonic principle.
However, several Phoenician consonants were absent in Greek, and thus several letter names came to be pronounced with initial vowels. Since the start of the name of a letter was expected to be the sound of the letter (the acrophonic principle), in Greek these letters came to be used for vowels. For example, the Greeks had no glottal stop or voiced pharyngeal sounds, so the Phoenician letters ’alep and `ayin became Greek alpha and o (later renamed omicron), and stood for the vowels /a/ and /o/ rather than the consonants /ʔ/ and /ʕ/. As this fortunate development only provided for five or six (depending on dialect) of the twelve Greek vowels, the Greeks eventually created
digraphs and other modifications, such as ei, ou, and o—which became
omega—or in some cases simply ignored the deficiency, as in long a, i, u.[21]
Several varieties of the Greek alphabet developed. One, known as the
Cumae alphabet, was used west of
Athens and in
southern Italy. The other variation, known as
Eastern Greek, was used in Asia Minor. The Athenians (
c. 400 BCE) adopted that latter variation and eventually the rest of the Greek-speaking world followed. After first writing right to left, the Greeks eventually chose to write from left to right, unlike the Phoenicians who wrote from right to left. Many Greek letters are similar to Phoenician, except the letter direction is reversed or changed, which can be the result of historical changes from right-to-left writing to
boustrophedon, then to left-to-right writing.
Descendants
Greek is in turn the source of all the modern scripts of Europe. The alphabet of the early western Greek dialects, where the letter
eta remained an /h/, gave rise to the
Old Italic alphabet which in turn developed into the Old
Roman alphabet. In the eastern Greek dialects, which did not have an /h/, eta stood for a vowel, and remains a vowel in modern Greek and all other alphabets derived from the eastern variants:
Glagolitic,
Cyrillic,
Armenian,
Gothic—which used both Greek and Roman letters—and perhaps
Georgian.[22]
Although this description presents the evolution of scripts in a linear fashion, this is a simplification. For example, Georgian scripts derive from the Semitic family, but were also strongly influenced in their conception by Greek. A modified version of the Greek alphabet, using an additional half dozen
demotic hieroglyphs, was used to write
Coptic Egyptian. Then there is
Cree syllabics (an
abugida), which is a fusion of
Devanagari and
Pitman shorthand developed by the missionary
James Evans.[23]
A tribe known as the
Latins, who became the Romans, also lived in the Italian peninsula like the Western Greeks. From the
Etruscans, a tribe living in the first millennium BCE in central
Italy, and the Western Greeks, the Latins adopted writing in about the seventh century. In adopting writing from these two groups, the Latins dropped four characters from the Western Greek alphabet. They also adapted the
Etruscan letterF, pronounced 'w,' giving it the 'f' sound, and the Etruscan S, which had three zigzag lines, was curved to make the modern
S. To represent the
G sound in Greek and the
K sound in Etruscan, the
gamma was used. These changes produced the modern alphabet without the letters
G,
J,
U,
W,
Y, and
Z, as well as some other differences.
C,
K, and
Q in the Roman alphabet could all be used to write both the /k/ and /ɡ/ sounds; the Romans soon modified the letter C to make G, inserted it in seventh place, where
Z had been, to maintain the
gematria (the numerical sequence of the alphabet). Over the few centuries after
Alexander the Great conquered the Eastern Mediterranean and other areas in the third century BCE, the Romans began to borrow Greek words, so they had to adapt their alphabet again in order to write these words. From the Eastern Greek alphabet, they borrowed
Y and
Z, which were added to the end of the alphabet because the only time they were used was to write Greek words.
The
Anglo-Saxons began using Roman letters to write
Old English as they converted to Christianity, following
Augustine of Canterbury's mission to Britain in the sixth century. Because the
Runicwen, which was first used to represent the sound 'w' and looked like a p that is narrow and triangular, was easy to confuse with an actual p, the 'w' sound began to be written using a double u. Because the u at the time looked like a v, the double u looked like two v's,
W was placed in the alphabet after
V.
U developed when people began to use the rounded
U when they meant the vowel u and the pointed
V when the meant the consonant
V.
J began as a variation of
I, in which a long tail was added to the final
I when there were several in a row. People began to use the
J for the consonant and the
I for the vowel by the fifteenth century, and it was fully accepted in the mid-seventeenth century.
Letter names and order
The order of the letters of the alphabet is attested from the fourteenth century BCE in the town of
Ugarit on
Syria's northern coast.[24] Tablets found there bear over one thousand cuneiform signs, but these signs are not Babylonian and there are only thirty distinct characters. About twelve of the tablets have the signs set out in alphabetic order. There are two orders found, one of which is nearly identical to the order used for
Hebrew,
Greek and
Latin, and a second order very similar to that used for
Ethiopian.[25]
It is not known how many letters the
Proto-Sinaitic alphabet had nor what their alphabetic order was. Among its descendants, the
Ugaritic alphabet had 27 consonants, the
South Arabian alphabets had 29, and the
Phoenician alphabet 22. These scripts were arranged in two orders, an ABGDE order in Phoenician and an HMĦLQ order in the south; Ugaritic preserved both orders. Both sequences proved remarkably stable among the descendants of these scripts.
The letter names proved stable among the many descendants of Phoenician, including
Samaritan,
Aramaic,
Syriac,
Arabic,
Hebrew, and
Greek alphabet. However, they were largely abandoned in
Tifinagh,
Latin and
Cyrillic. The letter sequence continued more or less intact into Latin,
Armenian,
Gothic, and
Cyrillic, but was abandoned in
Brahmi,
Runic, and Arabic, although a traditional abjadi order remains or was re-introduced as an alternative in the latter.
The table is a schematic of the Proto-Sinaitic script and its descendants.
These 26 consonants account for the phonology of
Northwest Semitic. Of the 29 consonant phonemes commonly reconstructed for
Proto-Semitic, the voiceless fricatives ś, ṣ́, and ṯ̣ are missing. The phonemes ḏ, ṯ, ḫ, ġ disappeared in Canaanite, merging with z, š, ḥ, ʿ in Canaanite scripts, respectively. The six variant letters added in the
Arabic alphabet include these (except for ś, which survives as a separate phoneme in
Ge'ezሠ):
One modern national alphabet that has not been graphically traced back to the Canaanite alphabet is the
Maldivian script, which is unique in that, although it is clearly modeled after
Arabic and perhaps other existing alphabets, it derives its letter forms from numerals. Another is the Korean
Hangul, which was created independently in 1443. The
Osmanya alphabet was devised for
Somali in the 1920s by
Osman Yusuf Kenadid, and the forms of its consonants appear to be complete innovations.
Among alphabets that are not used as national scripts today, a few are clearly independent in their letter forms. The
bopomofo phonetic alphabet is graphically derived from
Chinese characters. The
Santali alphabet of eastern India appears to be based on traditional symbols such as "danger" and "meeting place", as well as pictographs invented by its creator. (The names of the Santali letters are related to the sound they represent through the acrophonic principle, as in the original alphabet, but it is the final consonant or vowel of the name that the letter represents: le "swelling" represents e, while en 'thresh grain' represents n.)
In early medieval Ireland,
Ogham consisted of tally marks, and the monumental inscriptions of the
Old Persian Empire were written in an essentially alphabetic cuneiform script whose letter forms seem to have been created for the occasion.
Alphabets in other media
Changes to a new writing medium sometimes caused a break in graphical form, or make the relationship difficult to trace. It is not immediately obvious that the cuneiform
Ugaritic alphabet derives from a prototypical Semitic abjad, for example, although this appears to be the case. And while
manual alphabets are a direct continuation of the local written alphabet (both the
British two-handed and the
French/
American one-handed alphabets retain the forms of the Latin alphabet, as the
Indian manual alphabet does
Devanagari, and the
Korean does Hangul),
Braille,
semaphore,
maritime signal flags, and the
Morse codes are essentially arbitrary geometric forms. The shapes of the English Braille and semaphore letters are not derived from the graphic forms of the letters themselves. Most modern forms of
shorthand are also unrelated to the alphabet, generally transcribing sounds instead of letters.
^The Canaanites seem to have replaced the 𓄤 glyph with one resembling a spinning wheel (ṭayt) 𓊖.
^A
| glyph for ś has been found in the Canaanite Lachish Comb inscription, though no such glyph has been found in Proto-Sinaitic, and its origin hasn't been discovered.
^Van De Mieroop, Marc (2022). "Vernaculars That Changed the World". Before and after Babel. Oxford University Press. pp. 149–C7.P48.
ISBN978-0-197-63466-0.
^"Arabic Alphabet". Encyclopædia Britannica.
Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 2015-05-16.
^Daniels & Bright 1996, p. 27, "there are languages for which an alphabet is not an ideal writing system. The Semitic abjads really do fit the structure of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic very well, [more] than an alphabet would [...], since the spelling ensures that each root looks the same through its plethora of inflections and derivations.".
Haarmann, Harald (2004). Geschichte der Schrift [History of Writing] (in German) (2nd ed.). Munich: C. H. Beck.
ISBN3-406-47998-7.
Hooker, J. T., ed. (1998) [1990]. Reading the past: ancient writing from cuneiform to the alphabet. London: British Museum Press.
ISBN978-0-714-18077-9.
Fischer, Steven Roger (2021) [2005]. A history of writing (New ed.). London: Reaktion Books.
ISBN978-1-789-14349-2.
Hoffman, Joel M. (2004). In the beginning: a short history of the Hebrew language. New York University Press.
ISBN978-0-814-73654-8.
Logan, Robert K. (2004) [1986]. The alphabet effect: a media ecology understanding of the making of Western civilization. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
ISBN978-1-572-73522-4.
Naveh, Joseph (1997) [1982]. Early history of the alphabet: an introduction to west Semitic epigraphy and palaeography (Reprint ed.). Jerusalem: Magnes Press.
ISBN978-9-652-23436-0.
Powell, Barry B. (1991). Homer and the origin of the Greek alphabet. Cambridge University Press.
ISBN978-0-521-37157-5.
Ullman, B. L. (1927). "The Origin and Development of the Alphabet". American Journal of Archaeology. 31 (3): 311–328.
ISSN0002-9114.
JSTOR497822.