From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rung
Eastern Tibeto-Burman
Geographic
distribution
China, Burma, Nepal, India
Linguistic classification Sino-Tibetan
  • Rung
Subdivisions
GlottologNone

The Rung languages are a proposed branch of Sino-Tibetan languages. The branch was proposed by Randy LaPolla on the basis of morphological evidence such as pronominal paradigms. However, Guillaume Jacques and Thomas Pellard (2021) argues that these languages do not constitute a monophyly based on recent phylogenetic studies [1] [2] and on a thorough investigation of shared lexical innovations. [3]

LaPolla (2003) lists the following languages as part of his provisional "Rung" group. [4]

Kham, Magar, and Chepangic have also been proposed to form part of a Greater Magaric group.

References

  1. ^ Sagart, Laurent; Jacques, Guillaume; Lai, Yunfan; Ryder, Robin J.; Thouzeau, Valentin; Greenhill, Simon J.; List, Johann-Mattis (2019-05-21). "Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (21): 10317–10322. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817972116. ISSN  0027-8424. PMC  6534992. PMID  31061123.
  2. ^ Zhang, Hanzhi; Ji, Ting; Pagel, Mark; Mace, Ruth (2020). "Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 20792. Bibcode: 2020NatSR..1020792Z. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4. ISSN  2045-2322. PMC  7695722. PMID  33247154.
  3. ^ Jacques, Guillaume; Pellard, Thomas (2021-02-03). "Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis". Diachronica. 38 (1): 1–24. doi: 10.1075/dia.19058.jac. ISSN  0176-4225.
  4. ^ LaPolla, Randy. 2003. "Overview of Sino-Tibetan Morphosyntax". In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Routledge.
  • Thurgood, Graham and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.) (2003). The Sino-Tibetan Languages. London: Routledge. ISBN  0-7007-1129-5.