Study of how mathematics and physics relate to each other
The relationship between mathematics and physics has been a subject of study of
philosophers,
mathematicians and
physicists since
antiquity, and more recently also by
historians and
educators.[2] Generally considered a relationship of great intimacy,[3]mathematics has been described as "an essential tool for physics"[4] and
physics has been described as "a rich source of inspiration and insight in mathematics".[5]
In his work Physics, one of the topics treated by
Aristotle is about how the study carried out by mathematicians differs from that carried out by physicists.[6] Considerations about mathematics being the language of
nature can be found in the ideas of the
Pythagoreans: the convictions that "Numbers rule the world" and "All is number",[7][8] and two millennia later were also expressed by
Galileo Galilei: "The book of nature is written in the language of mathematics".[9][10]
Historical interplay
Before giving a
mathematical proof for the formula for the
volume of a
sphere,
Archimedes used physical reasoning to discover the solution (imagining the balancing of bodies on a scale).[11] From the seventeenth century, many of the most important advances in mathematics appeared motivated by the study of physics, and this continued in the following centuries (although in the nineteenth century mathematics started to become increasingly independent from physics).[12][13] The creation and development of
calculus were strongly linked to the needs of physics:[14] There was a need for a new mathematical language to deal with the new
dynamics that had arisen from the work of scholars such as Galileo Galilei and
Isaac Newton.[15] During this period there was little distinction between physics and mathematics;[16] as an example, Newton regarded
geometry as a branch of
mechanics.[17] As time progressed, the mathematics used in physics has become increasingly sophisticated, as in the case of
superstring theory.[18] Unconventional connections between the two fields are found all the time as in 1975
Wu–Yang dictionary, that related concepts of
gauge theory with
differential geometry.[19]
Despite the close relationship between math and physics, they are not synonyms. In mathematics objects can be defined exactly and logically related, but the object need have no relationship to experimental measurements. In physics, definitions are abstractions or idealizations, approximations adequate when compared to the natural world. For example, Newton built a physical model around definitions like based on observations, leading to the development of calculus and highly accurate planetary mechanics, but later this definition was superseded by improved models of mechanics.[20] Mathematics deals with entities whose properties can be known with
certainty.[21] According to
David Hume, only in logic and mathematics statements can be proved (being known with total certainty). While in the physical world one can never know the properties of its beings in an absolute or complete way, leading to a situation that was put by
Albert Einstein as "No number of experiments can prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong."[22]
Explain the effectiveness of mathematics in the study of the physical world: "At this point an enigma presents itself which in all ages has agitated inquiring minds. How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought which is independent of experience, is so admirably appropriate to the objects of reality?" —
Albert Einstein, in Geometry and Experience (1921).[23]
Clearly delineate mathematics and physics: For some results or discoveries, it is difficult to say to which area they belong: to the mathematics or to physics.[24]
What is essentially different between doing a physical experiment to see the result and making a mathematical calculation to see the result? (from the
Turing–
Wittgenstein debate)[29]
Is mathematics invented or discovered? (millennia-old question, raised among others by
Mario Livio)[32]
Education
In recent times the two disciplines have most often been taught separately, despite all the interrelations between physics and mathematics.[33] This led some professional mathematicians who were also interested in
mathematics education, such as
Felix Klein,
Richard Courant,
Vladimir Arnold and
Morris Kline, to strongly advocate teaching mathematics in a way more closely related to the physical sciences.[34][35]
^Al-Rasasi, Ibrahim (21 June 2004).
"All is number"(PDF). King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
Boniolo, Giovanni; Budinich, Paolo; Trobok, Majda, eds. (2005). The Role of Mathematics in Physical Sciences: Interdisciplinary and Philosophical Aspects. Dordrecht: Springer.
ISBN9781402031069.
Feynman, Richard P. (1992). "The Relation of Mathematics to Physics". The Character of Physical Law (Reprint ed.). London: Penguin Books. pp. 35–58.
ISBN978-0140175059.
Hardy, G. H. (2005).
A Mathematician's Apology(PDF) (First electronic ed.). University of Alberta Mathematical Sciences Society. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 9 October 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
Vafa, Cumrun (2000). "On the Future of Mathematics/Physics Interaction". Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives. USA: AMS. pp. 321–328.
ISBN978-0-8218-2070-4.
Witten, Edward (1986).
Physics and Geometry(PDF). Proceedings of the International Conference of Mathematicians. Berkeley, California. pp. 267–303. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 2013-12-28. Retrieved 2014-05-27.