A pain scale measures a
patient's
pain intensity or other features. Pain scales are a common communication tool in medical contexts, and are used in a variety of medical settings. Pain scales are a necessity to assist with better assessment of pain and patient screening. Pain measurements help determine the severity, type, and duration of the pain, and are used to make an accurate diagnosis, determine a treatment plan, and evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. [medical citation needed] Pain scales are based on trust, cartoons (behavioral), or imaginary data, and are available for neonates, infants, children, adolescents, adults, seniors, and persons whose communication is impaired. Pain assessments are often regarded as "the 5th
vital sign".[1]
A patient's self-reported pain is so critical in the pain assessment method that it has been described as the "most valid measure" of pain.[2][3] The focus on patient report of pain is an essential aspect of any pain scale, but there are additional features that should be included in a pain scale. In addition to focusing on the patient's perspective, a pain scale should also be free of bias, accurate and reliable, able to differentiate between pain and other undesired emotions, absolute not relative, and able to act as a predictor or screening tool.[2]
Pain
Pain is a complex experience with both sensory and emotional elements that typically indicates a potential issue in the
nervous system. It alerts organisms to potential injuries and medical conditions that may require medical assistance. The sensation of pain is an unpleasant or discomforting feeling that can manifest as sensations such as pricking, tingling, burning, stinging, shooting, aching, or electric. Pain can vary in intensity, from very mild to very severe; duration, short-lived to chronic; and location, one localized area or all over the body.[4]
There are three different types of pain based on the duration of the sensations: acute, episodic, and chronic. The most common are acute and chronic. Acute pain occurs suddenly, is sharp, and goes away once the issue is treated. Acute pain is caused by things like broken bones, childbirth, strained muscles, or burns.[5] Episodic pain occurs irregularly from time to time. It may be caused by underlying medical conditions or it can come out of nowhere.[5] Chronic pain is pain that is consistent for at least 3 months. Acute pain can become chronic, however, there usually is no known cause for chronic pain. Chronic pain can have negative effects on relationships, daily living, work, extracurricular activities, etc.[5]
The experience of pain is extremely unique for an individual, as all people feel pain differently. As a result of this, self-reporting is the best and most common practice for describing pain to medical personnel.[5]
History
The practice of measuring pain has been a topic in research since the late 1800s. There were many methods used for assessing the intensity of pain, in humans as well as animals, using electrical, mechanical, and heat stimuli. Over time these methods have evolved; however, there were limitations to these historical methods. The limitations were in addressing the dimensions of pain duration, modality, locus, and response type. The main focus at the time was on acute pain rather than chronic pain. Researchers and clinicians are more interested in information on chronic pain due to its longevity. The locus of pain also differs between clinical and experimental settings; clinical pain is usually deeper while experimental pain is superficial. Furthermore, the response type to pain can contribute to further challenges for interpretation in both preclinical and clinical research.[6][7]
The Dolorimeter, created in 1940 at Cornell University, was one of the first methods used to gather information on pain threshold and tolerance. The instrument applied steady pressure, heat, or electrical stimuli to measure sensations of pain. Beecher was one of the first to suggest something other than the dolorimeter; he suggested that clinical pain be measured by its relief using subjective ratings. Numerical rating scales (NRS), verbal rating scales (VRS), and visual analog scales (VAS) on a 10-cm continuum are the scales used to attain these ratings. Melzack and Torgerson developed the McGill Pain Questionnaire which rates pain quantitatively by sensory, evaluative, and affective descriptors. These are things like burning, shooting, and agonizing.[7]
There have been many methods developed that use observational techniques where pain is evaluated by others. Such a method, for example, is the FLACC scale. It is for young children who are too young to be able to tell anyone how they feel. It measures facial expressions, leg position, activity, crying, and concealability on a 0–2 scale.[7]
Pain assessment
There are many different instruments used to assess both the intensity of pain as well as the effect of pain. A few are listed below:
Numeric rating scale
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. It is based solely on the ability to perform
activities of daily living (ADLs) and can be used for adults and children 10 years old or older.[8]
Rating
Pain Level
0
No Pain
1–3
Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs)
4–6
Moderate Pain (interferes significantly with ADLs)
7–10
Severe Pain (disabling; unable to perform ADLs)
Pain interferes with a person's ability to perform ADLs. Pain also interferes with a person's ability to concentrate, and to think. A sufficiently strong pain can be disabling on a person's concentration and coherent thought, even though it is not strong enough to prevent that person's performance of ADLs. However, there is no system available for measuring concentration and thought.
Verbal rating scale
The verbal rating scale (VRS) is a pain measurement tool that uses adjectives to express various levels of pain. The scale is rated similarly from no pain at all to the most extreme pain ever felt. When doing clinical trials there is usually a four-to six-point VRS. There are a few limitations to this scale. Some people might find it hard to accurately express their pain with the limited number of options to choose from. Interpretation of the options is also a potential issue, as people could interpret them all differently.[9]
Visual analog scale
The visual analog scale is a visual scale that has two endpoints: "no pain" and "pain is as bad as it could be". When it was first created people had to physically write their answers on the scale. There are mechanical ones now to make the scoring of them easier.[9]
Lequesne algofunctional index: a composite measure of pain and disability, with separate self-report questionnaires for hip and knee OA (osteoarthritis):[30]
Osteoarthritis Research Society International-Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OARSI-OMERACT) Initiative, New OA Pain Measure: Disease-Specific, Osteoarthritis Pain[30]
WOMAC : Disease-Specific, to assess knee osteoarthritis outcomes.[30]
In endometriosis
The most common pain scale for quantification of
endometriosis-related pain is the
visual analogue scale (VAS). A review came to the conclusion that VAS and numerical rating scale (NRS) were the best adapted pain scales for pain measurement in endometriosis. For research purposes, and for more detailed pain measurement in clinical practice, the review suggested use of VAS or NRS for each type of typical pain related to endometriosis (
dysmenorrhea, deep
dyspareunia and non-menstrual
chronic pelvic pain), combined with the
clinical global impression (CGI) and a
quality of life scale.[17]
^Adams P (May 2017). "Supporting the Self-Management of Chronic Pain Conditions with Tailored Momentary Self-Assessments". Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vol. 2017. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1065–1077.
doi:
10.1145/3025453.3025832.
ISBN9781450346559.
PMC6176683.
PMID30310887.
^"Pain Intensity Instruments"(PDF). National Institutes of Health – Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center. July 2003. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 2011-12-15.
^Stinson, JN; Kavanagh, T; Yamada, J; Gill, N; Stevens, B (November 2006). "Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents". Pain. 125 (1–2): 143–57.
doi:
10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006.
PMID16777328.
S2CID406102.
^von Baeyer, C.L.; Spagrud, L.J. (2007). "Systematic review of observational (behavioral) measures of pain for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years". Pain. 127 (1–2): 140–150.
doi:
10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.014.
PMID16996689.
S2CID207307157.
^Gélinas, C; Fillion L; Puntillo KA; Viens C; Fortier M (2006). "Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in adult patients". American Journal of Critical Care. 15 (4): 420–427.
doi:
10.4037/ajcc2006.15.4.420.
PMID16823021.
^Ozguler A, Guéguen A, Leclerc A, Landre MF, Piciotti M, Le Gall S, Morel-Fatio M, Boureau F (2002). "Using the dallas pain questionnaire to classify individuals with low back pain in a working population". Spine. 27 (16): 1783–9.
doi:
10.1097/00007632-200208150-00018.
PMID12195072.
S2CID24544669.
^Hardy, J.D.; Wolff, H.G.; Goodell, H. (1952). Pain Sensations and Reactions. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co.
ASINB0006ASZ92.
^Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991). "The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients". J Palliat Care. 7 (2): 6–9.
doi:
10.1177/082585979100700202.
PMID1714502.
S2CID26165154.
^Nekolaichuk C, Watanabe S, Beaumont C (March 2008). "The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991--2006)". Palliat Med. 22 (2): 111–22.
doi:
10.1177/0269216307087659.
PMID18372376.
S2CID41926711.
^Lequesne M (1991). "Indices of severity and disease activity for osteoarthritis". Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 20 (Supplement 2): 48–54.
doi:
10.1016/0049-0172(91)90027-w.
PMID1866630.
^Lequesne MG (1997). "The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis". J Rheumatol. 24 (4): 779–781.
PMID9101517.
^Higginson IJ, McCarthy M (1993). "Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families?". Palliat Med. 7 (3): 219–28.
doi:
10.1177/026921639300700309.
PMID7505183.
S2CID23476645.
^Huskisson EC (1982). "Measurement of pain". J. Rheumatol. 9 (5): 768–9.
PMID6184474.
^Abbey, Jennifer (January 2004). "The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementia". International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 10 (1): 6–13.
doi:
10.12968/ijpn.2004.10.1.12013.
PMID14966439.
^Salmore R (2002). "Development of a new pain scale: Colorado Behavioral Numerical Pain Scale for sedated adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures". Gastroenterol Nurs. 25 (6): 257–62.
doi:
10.1097/00001610-200211000-00007.
PMID12488689.
S2CID22569187.
^Varni JW, Thompson KL, Hanson V (January 1987). "The Varni/Thompson Pediatric Pain Questionnaire. I. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis". Pain. 28 (1): 27–38.
doi:
10.1016/0304-3959(87)91056-6.
PMID3822493.
S2CID246622.
^Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A (December 1999). "Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting". Clin J Pain. 15 (4): 297–303.
doi:
10.1097/00002508-199912000-00006.
PMID10617258.
^Schmidt, Justin O.; Evans, David (1990). Hymenopteran venoms: striving toward the ultimate defense against vertebrates; chapter in Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press. pp. 387–419.
ISBN0-88706-896-0.
^Starr, C.K. (1985). "A simple pain scale for field comparison of Hymenopteran stings". Journal of Entomological Science. 20 (2): 225–231.
doi:
10.18474/0749-8004-20.2.225.