Political philosophy during the 1912 US presidential election
This article is about Theodore Roosevelt's progressive political platform announced that was during his 1912 presidential campaign. For the right-wing movement in the 2010s, see
Neo-nationalism.
This article's
lead sectionmay be too short to adequately
summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to
provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(October 2018)
New Nationalism was a policy platform first proposed by former President of the United States
Theodore Roosevelt in a speech in
Osawatomie, Kansas on August 31, 1910.
The progressive nationalist policies outlined in the speech would form the basis for
his campaign for a third term as president in
the 1912 election, first as a candidate for the
Republican Party nomination and then as a
Progressive.
Speech
Roosevelt made the case for what he called "the New Nationalism" in a speech in
Osawatomie, Kansas, on August 31, 1910.[1] The central issue he argued was government protection of
human welfare and
property rights,[2] but he also argued that human welfare was more important than property rights.[2][3] He insisted that only a powerful
federal government could regulate the economy and guarantee
justice,[2] and that a President can succeed in making his economic agenda successful only if he makes the protection of human welfare his highest priority.[2] Roosevelt believed that the
concentration in
industry was a natural part of the economy. He wanted executive agencies, not courts, to regulate business. The federal government should be used to protect the laboring men, women and children from
exploitation.[4] In terms of policy, Roosevelt's
platform included a broad range of social and political reforms advocated by progressives.[5][6][7]
Socioeconomic policy
In the socioeconomic sphere, the platform called for the following:
A National Health Service to include all existing government medical agencies
Social insurance to provide for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled.
The main theme of the platform was an attack on what he perceived as
the domination of politics by business interests, which allegedly controlled both established parties. The platform asserted:
To destroy this invisible Government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.[8]
To that end, the platform called for the following:
Strict limits and disclosure requirements on political campaign contributions.
Registration of lobbyists.
Recording and publication of Congressional committee proceedings.
According to Lewis L. Gould, "The Progressive party did not go as far as the New Deal of Franklin D. Roosevelt would, but it represented a long step in that direction."[10]
Quotations
"I do not ask for overcentralization; but I do ask that we work in a spirit of broad and far-reaching nationalism when we work for what concerns our people as a whole. We are all Americans. Our common interests are as broad as the continent. I speak to you here in Kansas exactly as I would speak in New York or Georgia, for the most vital problems are those which affect us all alike."[2]
"The essence of any struggle for healthy liberty has always been, and must always be, to take from some one man or class of men the right to enjoy power, or wealth, or position, or immunity, which has not been earned by service to his or their fellows. That is what you fought for in the Civil War, and that is what we strive for now."[2]
"We grudge no man a fortune in civil life if it is honorably obtained and well used. It is not even enough that it should have gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community."[2]