Parvini discusses political theories on the rule of elites on his
YouTube channel, "Academic Agent".[9]
In Bournbrook Magazine, Alexander Adams describes Parvini's book The Populist Delusion as "an informative, succinctly-written and accessible handbook for those who wish to understand the core principles of elite theory discussed by reactionaries and the dissident right".[9]
In 2024 the advocacy group
Hope not Hate described his views as "extreme" and aligned with the "scientific racist community".[10][11] John Sparrow from The Mallard points out the claims by Hope not Hate are made without any evidence and that Parvini has 14 years of mainstream publications with only two instances of race mentioned, neither of which would constitute "scientific racism". Sparrow goes further on: "In short, this is but one example of many poorly sourced, libellous, and defamatory claims published by Hope Not Hate that are entirely spurious and thoroughly illegitimate".[12]
Publications
Shakespeare’s History Plays: Rethinking Historicism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).[13]
Shakespeare and Contemporary Theory: New Historicism and Cultural Materialism (New York and London: Bloomsbury, 2012).[14]
Shakespeare and Cognition: Thinking Fast and Slow Through Character (New York and London: Palgrave, 2015).[15]
Shakespeare and New Historicist Theory (New York and London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2017).[16][17]
Shakespeare's Moral Compass: Ethical Thinking in his Plays (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018).[18][19]
The Defenders of Liberty: Human nature, Individualism, and Property Rights (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020).[20]
The Populist Delusion (Perth: Imperium Press, April 2022).[9]
The Prophets of Doom (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2023).[21]
^Moulton, Ian Frederick (2015). "Rethinking Historicism from Shakespeare to Milton". Shakespeare Quarterly. 66 (3): 374–378, 386.
doi:
10.1353/shq.2015.0044.
S2CID163080712.
^Dollimore, Jonathan (2013). "Review of Shakespeare and contemporary theory: New Historicism and cultural materialism". Textual Practice. 27 (4): 715–724.
doi:
10.1080/0950236X.2013.815422.
S2CID145668059.