This article is about the Georgian title. For other uses, see
Mepe (disambiguation).
A coin of King
David IV with Asomtavruli inscription reading ႫႴႤ[a]ႠႴႧႵႰႬႩႾႧႱႾႧ (mpe~apt~k~rn~kkht~skht) meaning "King, [of the] Abkhazians, Iberians, Ranis, Kakhetians, Armenians".[1]
An Asomtavrulifresco inscription of
Tamar at Bertubani Church of
David Gareji reading ႧႠႫႠႰ ႫႤႴႤႧ ႫႤႴႤ[a] (tamar mepet mepe) meaning "Tamar, King of Kings".[2]
The word is derived from Georgian word მეუფე (meupe)[8] which literally means
sovereign and
lord.[9][10] Some
Georgian dialects has the term as ნეფე (nepe), all derived from common
Proto-Kartvelian მფ/მეფე/მაფა (mp/mepe/mapa).[11] Even though mepe has a female equivalent, დედოფალი (dedopali;
lit.'queen')[12] it is only applied to the king's consort and does not have a meaning of a ruling monarch.[13]
The term mepe was utilized since pre-Christian beginnings with
Azo, but the role would get more structured during the reign of
Pharnavaz I[14] in the
3rd century BC.[15] His successors, the
Pharnavazid[b]mepes would be titled as goliath[20] who would possess 𐬓𐬀𐬭𐬆𐬥𐬀𐬵 (pharnah;
lit.'royal radiance'),[21] the divinely endowed glory believed by ancient
Persians[b] to mark only a legitimate ruler,[22] accompanied with დიდებაჲ (didebay;
lit.'greatness') and სუე (sue;
lit.'fortune; destiny').[23] Georgian monarch's reign was known as მეფობაჲ (mepobay;
lit.'kingship').[24][25] Loss of pharnah and sue led to imminent death or overthrow of mepe.[26]
In the late 6th century, the
Sassanid Empire would abolish[c] the Georgian kingship of the
Kingdom of Iberia resulting in the interregnum stretching from
c. 580[c] to 888 as a demoted
principality.[30][31] Despite the monarchy was in abeyance, and that royal governing disintegrated, the principality rulers would still continue to claim to be referred to as mepes and ჴელმწიფე (helmts'ipe;
lit.'sovereign').[32] After 888[33][34] (or 889)[35] restoration under next successive dynasty[d] of mepeAdarnase IV, the
new kingdom would emerge as the fusion of many lands and territories, that would lead towards a total
Georgian unification, culminating in 1008.[36]
In the 12th century,[37] the
Bagratid[d]mepeDavid IV the Builder, who had established himself as the region's superlative political and military force,[46] with his ambitious and sophisticated push for his kingdom's royal imagery promotion,[47] the official style of a king would become imperial[48] თჳთმპყრობელი (tuitmp'q'robeli;
lit.'absolute master'[49] i.e. autokratōr)[50] and მეფეთ[ა]მეფე (mepet[a]mepe;[51][52][e]
lit.'
King of Kings'), similar to the Byzantine βασιλεὺς βασιλέων (basileus basileōn) and Persian شاهنشاه (shahanshah).[57] David IV's royal projection of his grandiose title was partly aimed at a non-Georgian audience.[58] Title Shahanshah was later totally usurped[59] and consistently used by Georgian monarchs, denoting sovereignty over several Persianate subjects such as
Shirvanshahs, the
Shaddadids and the
Eldiguzids.[60] The royal cult of a monarch would reach its zenith with a female ruler, Tamar, whose execution of power would inaugurate the
Georgian Golden Age, her being styled as
Tamar, the mepe.[61] Tamar was given the longest and more elaborate titles on the
royal charters, listing all the peoples and lands that she ruled as a semi-saint mepetamepe.[62] The Bagrationi mepe, with its royal legitimacy[f] and ideological pillar, would rule Georgia for a millennium, from its medieval elevation down to the
Russian conquest in the early 19th century.[66]
^
abcThe terms ႫႴ (mp), ႫႴႤ (mpe) and ႫႤႴႤ (mepe) were used simultaneously. Such abbreviations were common in Georgian.[3]
^
abThe Pharnavazids were fascinated by the Persian structure of royal administration, yet cultivated close relations with the Hellenistic
Seleucids.[16] The pre-Christian Georgian kings modeled themselves in a same heroic garb as in the Iranian epic cycle and imagery,[17] also incorporating several allusions to the
Hebrew Bible and
Classical Syriac sources.[18] The pre-Christian Georgian rulers identified Persia as the "land of heroes and giants", an exalted status that was never bestowed upon Rome or Byzantium.[19]
^
abThe Chosroids were dethroned immediately after the death of King
Bakur III.[27] Bakur's sons would remain in the mountainous region of Kakheti;[28] their royal pedigree would rule the region as titular princes styled as mtavari.[29]
^
abThe Bagratids restored the royal authority soon after they succeeded the
Chosroids and seized the
Principality of Iberia in 813.[38][39] They brought rapid expansion and consolidation within Georgian polities. Bagrationi monarchs would base much of their culture modeling and competing intensely with the
Byzantine emperors.[40] They frequently claimed saintly status and linked themselves with the divine,
eucharistic symbolism, had
Davidic lineage pretensions,[41] their royal superiority always depicted
haloes and
crowns and surrounded by the warrior saints.[42] 12th century icon preserved in the collection of the
Saint Catherine's Monastery on
Mount Sinai shows King
David IV, styled as "pious emperor", standing next to
Saint George and receiving the crown from
Jesus Christ.[43] The Bagratid kings would expand their authority beyond the confines of Georgia itself, transforming the kingdom into an imperial power.[44] Georgia's imperial "Byzantinization" would result in abandoning its traditional use of the
Syro-Palestinian liturgy; in the presence of thousands of Georgian monks throughout Byzantine lands, including Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Cyprus, Anatolia, Bulgaria, on Mount Athos; and the Byzantino-Georgian exchange of diplomatic marriages.[45]
^The first Georgian king to assume the title "mepet[a]mepe" was
Gurgen of Iberia,[53] but the term would become absolute and universal during and after David IV.[54][55] Gurgen's title is elaborated by the Bagratid-commissioned chronicler
Sumbat Davitis Dze, explaining Gurgen being a mepe, and a father, of another mepe. Gurgen ruled the
Kingdom of the Iberians, while his son,
Bagrat, led the
Kingdom of the Abkhazians.[56]
^The Georgian kingship had stubborn and staunch devotion to rules of legitimism[63] and the
dynastic succession as a new mepe should have had a biological connection and/or matrimony with an existing family.[64] The Pharnavazids, Chosroids and Bagratids were related through descent, intermarriage and adoption.[65]
Rapp, Stephen H. (2014) The Sasanian World through Georgian Eyes: Caucasia and the Iranian Commonwealth in Late Antique Georgian Literature,
Ashgate Publishing,
ISBN978-1-4724-2552-2
Rapp, Stephen H. (2003) Studies In Medieval Georgian Historiography: Early Texts And Eurasian Contexts; Peeters Bvba
ISBN90-429-1318-5
Eastmond, A. (2017) Eastern Approaches to Byzantium: Papers from the Thirty-Third Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, University of Warwick, Routledge,
ISBN978-1-351-94213-3
Bakhtadze, M. (2015) Georgian titulature of Tao-Klarjeti ruling Bagrationi dynasty,
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Institute of Georgian History Proceedings, IX, Tbilisi, Publishing Meridiani