Bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT), sometimes referred to as marrow adipose tissue (MAT), is a type of
fat deposit in
bone marrow. It increases in states of low bone density -
osteoporosis,[1][2]anorexia nervosa/
caloric restriction,[3][4] skeletal
unweighting such as that which occurs in
space travel,[5][6] and anti-
diabetes therapies.[7] BMAT decreases in anaemia, leukaemia, and hypertensive heart failure; in response to hormones such as oestrogen, leptin, and growth hormone; with exercise-induced weight loss or bariatric surgery; in response to chronic cold exposure; and in response to pharmacological agents such as bisphosphonates, teriparatide, and metformin.[8]
Anatomy
Bone marrow
adipocytes (BMAds)[9] originate from
mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)progenitors that also give rise to
osteoblasts, among other cell types.[10] Thus, it is thought that BMAT results from preferential
MSC differentiation into the
adipocyte, rather than osteoblast, lineage in the setting of osteoporosis.[11] Since BMAT is increased in the setting of obesity[12][13][14] and is suppressed by endurance exercise,[15][12][16][17] or
vibration,[18] it is likely that BMAT physiology, in the setting of mechanical input/exercise, approximates that of
white adipose tissue (WAT).
Physiology
Exercise regulation
The first study to demonstrate exercise regulation of BMAT in
rodents was published in 2014;[12] Now, exercise regulation of BMAT has been confirmed in a human,[19] adding clinical importance. Several studies demonstrated exercise reduction of BMAT which occurs along with an increase in bone quantity.[17][15][16][20] Since exercise increases bone quantity, reduces BMAT and increases expression of markers of fatty acid oxidation in bone, BMAT is thought to be providing needed fuel for exercise-induced
bone formation or
anabolism.[16] A notable exception occurs in the setting of caloric restriction: exercise suppression of BMAT does not yield an increase in bone formation and even appears to cause bone loss.[4][21][20] Indeed,
energy availability appears to be a factor in the ability of exercise to regulate BMAT.[4] Another exception occurs in
lipodystrophy, a condition with reduced overall
adipose stores: exercise- induced
anabolism is possible, even with minimal BMAT stores.[22]
Relationships to other types of fat
BMAT has been reported to have qualities of both
white and
brown fat.[23] However, more-recent functional and -omics studies have shown that BMAT is a unique adipose depot that is molecularly and functionally distinct to WAT or BAT.[24][25][26][27]Subcutaneous white fat contain excess energy, indicating a clear evolutionary advantage during times of scarcity.
WAT is also the source of
adipokines and inflammatory markers which have both positive (e.g.,
adiponectin)[28] and negative[29] effects on metabolic and cardiovascular endpoints.
Visceral abdominal fat (VAT) is a distinct type of WAT that is "proportionally associated with negative metabolic and cardiovascular morbidity",[30] regenerates cortisol,[31] and recently has been tied to decreased bone formation[32][33] Both types of
WAT substantially differ from
brown adipose tissue (BAT) as by a group of proteins that help BAT's
thermogenic role.[34] BMAT, by its "specific
marrow location, and its adipocyte origin from at least
LepR+ marrow MSC is separated from non-bone fat storage by larger expression of bone transcription factors",[35] and likely indicates a different fat phenotype.[36] Recently, BMAT was noted to "produce a greater proportion of
adiponectin – an adipokine associated with improved metabolism – than
WAT",[37] suggesting an endocrine function for this depot, akin, but different, from that of
WAT.
Impact on bone health
BMAT increases in states of bone fragility. BMAT is thought to result from preferential MSC differentiation into an adipocyte, rather than osteoblast lineage in
osteoporosis[11][20] based on the inverse relationship between bone and BMAT in bone-fragile osteoporotic states. An increase in BMAT is noted in osteoporosis clinical studies measured by
MR spectroscopy.[38][39][40]Estrogen therapy in
postmenopausal osteoporosis reduces BMAT.[41] Antiresorptive therapies like
risedronate or
zoledronate also decrease BMAT while increasing bone density, supporting an inverse relationship between bone quantity and BMAT. During aging, bone quantity declines[42][43] and fat redistributes from subcutaneous to
ectopic sites such as
bone marrow, muscle, and liver.[44]Aging is associated with lower osteogenic and greater adipogenic biasing of MSC.[45] This aging-related biasing of MSC away from osteoblast lineage may represent higher basal
PPARγ expression[46] or decreased Wnt10b.[47][48][49] Thus, bone fragility, osteoporosis, and osteoporotic fractures are thought to be linked to mechanisms which promote BMAT accumulation.[citation needed]
Maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells
BMAds secrete factors that promote HSC renewal in most bones.[50]
Hematopoietic cells (also known as blood cells) reside in the bone marrow along with BMAds. These hematopoietic cells are derived from
hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) which give rise to diverse cells: cells of the blood, immune system, as well as cells that break down bone (
osteoclasts). HSC renewal occurs in the marrow
stem cell niche, a microenvironment that contains cells and secreted factors that promote appropriate renewal and differentiation of HSC. The study of the
stem cell niche is relevant to the field of
oncology in order to improve therapy for multiple
hematologic cancers. As such cancers are often treated with
bone marrow transplantation, there is interest in improving the renewal of HSC.[citation needed]
Measurement
In order to understand the physiology of BMAT, various analytic methods have been applied. BMAds are difficult to isolate and quantify because they are interspersed with bony and
hematopoietic elements. Until recently, qualitative measurements of BMAT have relied on bone
histology,[51][52] which is subject to site
selection bias and cannot adequately quantify the volume of fat in the marrow. Nevertheless, histological techniques and fixation make possible visualization of BMAT, quantification of BMAd size, and BMAT's association with the surrounding
endosteum, milieu of cells, and secreted factors.[53][54][55]
Recent advances in cell surface and intracellular marker identification and single-cell analyses led to greater resolution and high-throughput ex-vivo quantification.
Flow cytometric quantification can be used to purify adipocytes from the stromal vascular fraction of most fat depots.[56] Early research with such machinery cited adipocytes as too large and fragile for cytometer-based purification, rendering them susceptible to lysis; however, recent advances have been made to mitigate this;[57] nevertheless, this methodology continues to pose technical challenges[58] and is inaccessible to much of the research community.
To improve quantification of BMAT, novel
imaging techniques have been developed as a means to visualize and quantify BMAT. Although
proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) has been used with success to quantify vertebral BMAT in humans,[59] it is difficult to employ in laboratory animals.[60]Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides BMAT assessment in the
vertebral skeleton[61] in conjunction with
μCT-based marrow density measurements.[62] A volumetric method to identify, quantify, and localize BMAT in rodent bone has been recently developed, requiring
osmium staining of bones and
μCT imaging,[63] followed by advanced
image analysis of osmium-bound lipid volume (in mm3) relative to bone volume.[12][16][15] This technique provides reproducible quantification and visualization of BMAT, enabling the ability to consistently quantify changes in BMAT with diet, exercise, and agents that constrain precursor lineage allocation. Although the osmium method is quantitatively precise, osmium is toxic and cannot be compared across batched experiments. Recently, researchers developed and validated[16] a 9.4T MRI scanner technique that allows localization and volumetric (3D) quantification that can be compared across experiments, as in.[4]
Several studies have also analysed BMAT function in vivo using positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT) combined with the tracer 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). This allows glucose uptake, a measure of metabolic activity, to be quantified in living organisms, including humans. Two recent studies found that, unlike brown adipose tissue, BMAT does not increase glucose uptake in response to cold exposure, demonstrating that BMAT is functionally distinct from BAT.[24][64] The full extent of BMAT's impact on systemic metabolic homeostasis remains to be determined.
Methods for Quantification of Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue (BMAT)
This figure demonstrates the use of the osmium- μCT method with advanced image processing to quantify BMAT. In this figure, running exercise is shown to suppress BMAT despite PPARγ agonist. Fat binder osmium is imaged via μCT (A ) in n =5 per group overlaid images. Quantification of osmium as BMAT/ bone volume in the whole femur is shown. a, significant due to Rosi. b, significant due to exercise. Rosi=rosiglizaone, CTL=control, E=exercise.
This figure demonstrates the use of MRI imaging (9.4T scanner) along with advanced image processing to quantify BMAT. The images and graph demonstrate that BMAT is higher in obese compared with lean mice. B6 mice were fed HFD from age 4 wk until age 16 wk. BMAT was quantified by MRI. A) n=10 superimposed group average images are shown B) BMAT normalized to bone volume in each group.
Representative distal femur histologic section of a 16-week-old healthy C57BL/6 mouse demonstrating a typical quantity of marrow adipocytes.
Representative distal femur histologic section of a 16-week-old C57BL/6 mouse after 6 weeks of calorie restriction demonstrating an increased quantity of marrow adipocytes.
Scientific societies
The International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society (BMAS)
Because of the increasing interest in BMAT from both researchers and clinicians, in 2018 The International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society (BMAS) was founded.[65] Work to build the society began in Lille, France in 2015, when the first International Meeting on Bone Marrow Adiposity (BMA2015) was held. The meeting was a great success and led to a second international meeting (BMA2016) in August 2016 held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Both meetings were a success in that they for the first time brought together scientists and physicians from different backgrounds (bone metabolism, cancer, obesity and diabetes) to share ideas and advance research into, and our understanding of, the patho/physiological role of BMAds.
This success led to a network of researchers discussing the formation of a new society, focusing on bone marrow adiposity (BMA). This network worked together in 2016–2017 to lay the foundations for this society, which was then discussed further during the third international meeting held in Lausanne, Switzerland in 2017 (BMA2017). The statues were then signed at the fourth international meeting, held in 2018 again in Lille (BMA2018). As discussed in the following section, there have since been three further international meetings, held in Odense, Denmark in 2019 (BMA2019), virtually in 2020 (BMA2020), and in Athens, Greece in 2022 (BMA2022). The first BMAS Summer School was held virtually in the summer of 2021.
Since its foundation,
BMAS working groups have published three position papers relating to nomenclature,[9] methodologies [66] and biobanking for BMA research.[67] These working groups remain active, with other working groups also focussing on clinical and translational issues, public engagement, and young researchers (Next Generation BMAS)
^Meunier P, Aaron J, Edouard C, Vignon G (October 1971). "Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. A quantitative study of 84 iliac bone biopsies". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 80: 147–154.
doi:
10.1097/00003086-197110000-00021.
PMID5133320.
^Wronski TJ, Morey ER (1982-01-01). "Skeletal abnormalities in rats induced by simulated weightlessness". Metabolic Bone Disease & Related Research. 4 (1): 69–75.
doi:
10.1016/0221-8747(82)90011-X.
PMID7121257.
^Muruganandan S, Roman AA, Sinal CJ (January 2009). "Adipocyte differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: cross talk with the osteoblastogenic program". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 66 (2): 236–253.
doi:
10.1007/s00018-008-8429-z.
PMID18854943.
S2CID5558912.
^Gimble JM, Zvonic S, Floyd ZE, Kassem M, Nuttall ME (May 2006). "Playing with bone and fat". Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 98 (2): 251–266.
doi:
10.1002/jcb.20777.
PMID16479589.
S2CID19746472.
^Duque G, Li W, Adams M, Xu S, Phipps R (May 2011). "Effects of risedronate on bone marrow adipocytes in postmenopausal women". Osteoporosis International. 22 (5): 1547–1553.
doi:
10.1007/s00198-010-1353-8.
PMID20661545.
S2CID27850362.
^Majka SM, Miller HL, Helm KM, Acosta AS, Childs CR, Kong R, Klemm DJ (2014). "Analysis and Isolation of Adipocytes by Flow Cytometry". Methods of Adipose Tissue Biology, Part A. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 537. pp. 281–96.
doi:
10.1016/b978-0-12-411619-1.00015-x.
ISBN9780124116191.
PMC4143162.
PMID24480352.
^Scheller EL, Troiano N, Vanhoutan JN, Bouxsein MA, Fretz JA, Xi Y, et al. (2014). "Use of Osmium Tetroxide Staining with Microcomputerized Tomography to Visualize and Quantify Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue in Vivo". Methods of Adipose Tissue Biology, Part A. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 537. pp. 123–39.
doi:
10.1016/b978-0-12-411619-1.00007-0.
ISBN9780124116191.
PMC4097010.
PMID24480344.
^Hardouin P, Marie PJ, Rosen CJ (December 2016). "New insights into bone marrow adipocytes: Report from the First European Meeting on Bone Marrow Adiposity (BMA 2015)". Bone. 93: 212–215.
doi:
10.1016/j.bone.2015.11.013.
PMID26608519.