A marine coastal ecosystem is a
marine ecosystem which occurs where the land meets the ocean. Marine coastal ecosystems include many very different types of
marine habitats, each with their own characteristics and species composition. They are characterized by high levels of biodiversity and productivity.
For example,
estuaries are areas where freshwater rivers meet the saltwater of the ocean, creating an environment that is home to a wide variety of species, including fish, shellfish, and birds.
Salt marshes are coastal wetlands which thrive on low-energy shorelines in
temperate and
high-latitude areas, populated with
salt-tolerant plants such as
cordgrass and
marsh elder that provide important nursery areas for many species of fish and shellfish.
Mangrove forests survive in the
intertidal zones of tropical or subtropical coasts, populated by
salt-tolerant trees that protect habitat for many marine species, including crabs, shrimp, and fish.
Further examples are
coral reefs and
seagrass meadows, which are both found in warm, shallow coastal waters. Coral reefs thrive in nutrient-poor waters on high-energy shorelines that are agitated by waves. They are underwater ecosystem made up of
colonies of tiny animals called
coral polyps. These polyps secrete hard
calcium carbonate skeletons that builds up over time, creating complex and diverse underwater structures. These structures function as some of the most biodiverse ecosystems on the planet, providing habitat and food for a huge range of marine organisms. Seagrass meadows can be adjacent to coral reefs. These meadows are underwater grasslands populated by
marine flowering plants that provide nursery habitats and food sources for many fish species, crabs and
sea turtles, as well as
dugongs. In slightly deeper waters are
kelp forests, underwater ecosystems found in cold, nutrient-rich waters, primarily in temperate regions. These are dominated by a large
brown algae called
kelp, a type of seaweed that grows several meters tall, creating dense and complex underwater forests. Kelp forests provide important habitats for many fish species,
sea otters and
sea urchins.
Directly and indirectly, marine coastal ecosystems provide vast arrays of
ecosystem services for humans, such as
cycling nutrients and
elements, and purifying water by filtering pollutants. They
sequester carbon as a cushion against
climate change. They protect coasts by reducing the impacts of storms, reducing
coastal erosion and moderating extreme events. They provide essential nurseries and
fishing grounds for
commercial fisheries. They provide recreational services and support tourism.
These ecosystems are vulnerable to various anthropogenic and natural disturbances, such as
pollution,
overfishing, and coastal development, which have significant impacts on their ecological functioning and the services they provide. Climate change is impacting coastal ecosystems with
sea level rises,
ocean acidification, and increased storm frequency and intensity. When marine coastal ecosystems are damaged or destroyed, there can be serious consequences for the marine species that depend on them, as well as for the overall health of the ocean ecosystem. Some conservation efforts are underway to protect and restore marine coastal ecosystems, such as establishing
marine protected areas and developing
sustainable fishing practices.
Overview
Coastal seas are highly productive systems, providing an array of ecosystem services to humankind, such as processing of nutrient effluents from land and climate regulation.[1] However, coastal ecosystems are threatened by human-induced pressures such as climate change and
eutrophication. In the coastal zone, the fluxes and transformations of nutrients and carbon sustaining coastal ecosystem functions and services are strongly regulated by
benthic (that is, occurring at the
seafloor) biological and chemical processes.[1]
Coastal systems also contribute to the regulation of climate and
nutrient cycles, by efficiently processing anthropogenic emissions from land before they reach the ocean.[2][3][4][5] The high value of these ecosystem services is obvious considering that a large proportion of the world population lives close to the coast.[6][7][1]
Currently, coastal seas around the world are undergoing major ecological changes driven by human-induced pressures, such as climate change, anthropogenic nutrient inputs,
overfishing and the spread of
invasive species.[8][9] In many cases, the changes alter underlying ecological functions to such an extent that new states are achieved and
baselines are shifted.[10][11][1]
In 2015, the United Nations established 17
Sustainable Development Goals with the aim of achieving certain targets by 2030. Their mission statement for their 14th goal, Life below water, is to "conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development".[12] The United Nations has also declared 2021–2030 the
UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, but restoration of coastal ecosystems is not receiving appropriate attention.[13]
Intertidal zones are the areas that are visible and exposed to air during low tide and covered up by saltwater during high tide.[14] There are four physical divisions of the intertidal zone with each one having its distinct characteristics and wildlife. These divisions are the Spray zone, High intertidal zone, Middle Intertidal zone, and Low intertidal zone. The Spray zone is a damp area that is usually only reached by the ocean and submerged only under high tides or storms. The high intertidal zone is submerged at high tide but remains dry for long periods between high tides.[14] Due to the large variance of conditions possible in this region, it is inhabited by resilient wildlife that can withstand these changes such as barnacles, marine snails, mussels and hermit crabs.[14] Tides flow over the middle intertidal zone two times a day and this zone has a larger variety of wildlife.[14] The low intertidal zone is submerged nearly all the time except during the lowest tides and life is more abundant here due to the protection that the water gives.[14]
Estuaries occur where there is a noticeable change in salinity between saltwater and freshwater sources. This is typically found where rivers meet the ocean or sea. The wildlife found within estuaries is unique as the water in these areas is brackish - a mix of freshwater flowing to the ocean and salty seawater.[15] Other types of estuaries also exist and have similar characteristics as traditional brackish estuaries. The Great Lakes are a prime example. There, river water mixes with lake water and creates freshwater estuaries.[15] Estuaries are extremely productive ecosystems that many humans and animal species rely on for various activities.[16] This can be seen as, of the 32 largest cities in the world, 22 are located on estuaries as they provide many environmental and economic benefits such as crucial habitat for many species, and being economic hubs for many coastal communities.[16] Estuaries also provide essential ecosystem services such as water filtration, habitat protection, erosion control, gas regulation nutrient cycling, and it even gives education, recreation and tourism opportunities to people.[17]
Lagoons are areas that are separated from larger water by natural barriers such as coral reefs or sandbars. There are two types of lagoons, coastal and oceanic/atoll lagoons.[18] A coastal lagoon is, as the definition above, simply a body of water that is separated from the ocean by a barrier. An atoll lagoon is a circular coral reef or several coral islands that surround a lagoon. Atoll lagoons are often much deeper than coastal lagoons.[19] Most lagoons are very shallow meaning that they are greatly affected by changed in precipitation, evaporation and wind. This means that salinity and temperature are widely varied in lagoons and that they can have water that ranges from fresh to hypersaline.[19] Lagoons can be found in on coasts all over the world, on every continent except Antarctica and is an extremely diverse habitat being home to a wide array of species including birds, fish, crabs, plankton and more.[19] Lagoons are also important to the economy as they provide a wide array of ecosystem services in addition to being the home of so many different species. Some of these services include fisheries, nutrient cycling, flood protection, water filtration, and even human tradition.[19]
Coral reefs are one of the most well-known marine ecosystems in the world, with the largest being the
Great Barrier Reef. These reefs are composed of large coral colonies of a variety of species living together. The corals from multiple symbiotic relationships with the organisms around them.[20] Coral reefs are being heavily affected by global warming. They are one of the most vulnerable marine ecosystems. Due to marine heatwaves that have high warming levels coral reefs are at risk of a great decline, loss of its important structures, and exposure to higher frequency of marine heatwaves.[21]
Coral reef
Global distribution of coral, mangrove, and seagrass diversity
A shy but threatened
dugong grazes a seagrass meadow, encouraging regrowth[22]
Bivalve reefs
Bivalve reefs provide coastal protection through erosion control and shoreline stabilization, and modify the physical landscape by
ecosystem engineering, thereby providing habitat for species by facilitative interactions with other habitats such as
tidal flat benthic communities,
seagrasses and
marshes.[23]
Vegetated coastal ecosystems occur throughout the world, as illustrated in the diagram on the right.
Seagrass beds are found from cold polar waters to the tropics.
Mangrove forests are confined to tropical and sub-tropical areas, while
tidal marshes are found in all regions, but most commonly in temperate areas. Combined, these ecosystems cover about 50 million hectares and provide a diverse array of
ecosystem services such as fishery production, coastline protection, pollution buffering, as well as high rates of
carbon sequestration.[25][24]
Rapid loss of vegetated coastal ecosystems through land-use change has occurred for centuries, and has accelerated in recent decades. Causes of habitat conversion vary globally and include conversion to aquaculture, agriculture, forest over-exploitation, industrial use, upstream dams, dredging, eutrophication of overlying waters, urban development, and conversion to open water due to accelerated sea-level rise and subsidence.[25][24]
Vegetated coastal ecosystems typically reside over organic-rich sediments that may be several meters deep and effectively lock up carbon due to low-oxygen conditions and other factors that inhibit decomposition at depth.[26] These carbon stocks can exceed those of terrestrial ecosystems, including forests, by several times.[27][28] When coastal habitats are degraded or converted to other land uses, the sediment carbon is destabilised or exposed to oxygen, and subsequent increased microbial activity releases large amounts of greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere or
water column.[29][26][30][31][32][33] The potential economic impacts that come from releasing stored coastal
blue carbon to the atmosphere are felt worldwide. Economic impacts of greenhouse gas emissions in general stem from associated increases in droughts, sea level, and frequency of extreme weather events.[34][24]
Conceptual diagram of estuarine vegetation
Ecosystem services provided by a vegetated coastal ecosystem.[35] Diagram showing connectivity between a vegetated coastal ecosystem for the
Penaeid prawn lifecycle indicating that valuations for harvest areas may overlook critical importance within the lifecycle.[35]
Coastal wetlands
Mangrove forests
Salt marshes
Coastal wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems on Earth and generate vital services that benefit human societies around the world. Sediment-stabilization by wetlands such as salt marshes and mangroves serves to protect coastal communities from storm-waves, flooding, and land erosion.[39] Coastal wetlands also reduce pollution from human waste,[40][41] remove excess nutrients from the water column,[42] trap pollutants,[43] and sequester carbon.[44] Further, near-shore wetlands act as both essential nursery habitats and feeding grounds for
game fish, supporting a diverse group of economically important species.[45][46][47][48][49]
Mangroves are trees or shrubs that grow in low-oxygen soil near coastlines in tropical or subtropical latitudes.[50] They are an extremely productive and complex ecosystem that connects the land and sea. Mangroves consist of species that are not necessarily related to each other and are often grouped for the characteristics they share rather than genetic similarity.[51] Because of their proximity to the coast, they have all developed adaptions such as salt excretion and root aeration to live in salty, oxygen-depleted water.[51] Mangroves can often be recognized by their dense tangle of roots that act to protect the coast by reducing erosion from storm surges, currents, wave, and tides.[50] The mangrove ecosystem is also an important source of food for many species as well as excellent at
sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere with global mangrove carbon storage is estimated at 34 million metric tons per year.[51]
Salt marshes are a transition from the ocean to the land, where fresh and saltwater mix.[52] The soil in these marshes is often made up of mud and a layer of organic material called peat. Peat is characterized as waterlogged and root-filled decomposing plant matter that often causes low oxygen levels (hypoxia). These hypoxic conditions causes growth of the bacteria that also gives salt marshes the sulfurous smell they are often known for.[53] Salt marshes exist around the world and are needed for healthy ecosystems and a healthy economy. They are extremely productive ecosystems and they provide essential services for more than 75 percent of fishery species and protect shorelines from erosion and flooding.[53] Salt marshes can be generally divided into the high marsh, low marsh, and the upland border. The low marsh is closer to the ocean, with it being flooded at nearly every tide except low tide.[52] The high marsh is located between the low marsh and the upland border and it usually only flooded when higher than usual tides are present.[52] The upland border is the freshwater edge of the marsh and is usually located at elevations slightly higher than the high marsh. This region is usually only flooded under extreme weather conditions and experiences much less waterlogged conditions and salt stress than other areas of the marsh.[52]
Seagrasses form dense underwater
meadows which are among the most productive ecosystems in the world. They provide habitats and food for a diversity of marine life comparable to coral reefs. This includes invertebrates like shrimp and crabs, cod and flatfish, marine mammals and birds. They provide refuges for endangered species such as seahorses, turtles, and dugongs. They function as nursery habitats for shrimps, scallops and many commercial fish species. Seagrass meadows provide coastal storm protection by the way their leaves absorb energy from waves as they hit the coast. They keep
coastal waters healthy by absorbing bacteria and nutrients, and slow the speed of climate change by sequestering carbon dioxide into the sediment of the ocean floor.
Seagrasses evolved from marine algae which colonized land and became land plants, and then returned to the ocean about 100 million years ago. However, today seagrass meadows are being damaged by human activities such as pollution from land runoff, fishing boats that drag dredges or trawls across the meadows uprooting the grass, and overfishing which unbalances the ecosystem. Seagrass meadows are currently being destroyed at a rate of about two football fields every hour.
Kelp forests occur worldwide throughout
temperate and
polar coastal oceans.[54] In 2007, kelp forests were also discovered in
tropical waters near
Ecuador.[55]
Physically formed by brown
macroalgae, kelp forests provide a unique habitat for marine organisms[56] and are a source for understanding many ecological processes. Over the last century, they have been the focus of extensive research, particularly in
trophic ecology, and continue to provoke important ideas that are relevant beyond this unique ecosystem. For example, kelp forests can influence coastal
oceanographic patterns[57] and provide many
ecosystem services.[58]
However, the influence of humans has often contributed to kelp
forest degradation. Of particular concern are the effects of
overfishing nearshore ecosystems, which can release
herbivores from their normal population regulation and result in the
overgrazing of kelp and other algae.[59] This can rapidly result in transitions to
barren landscapes where relatively few species persist.[60][61] Already due to the combined effects of
overfishing and
climate change, kelp forests have all but disappeared in many especially vulnerable places, such as
Tasmania's east coast and the coast of
Northern California.[62][63] The implementation of
marine protected areas is one management strategy useful for addressing such issues, since it may limit the impacts of fishing and buffer the ecosystem from additive effects of other environmental stressors.
Coastal waters include the waters in
estuaries and over
continental shelves. They occupy about 8 percent of the total ocean area[64] and account for about half of all the ocean productivity. The key nutrients determining
eutrophication are nitrogen in coastal waters and phosphorus in lakes. Both are found in high concentrations in
guano (seabird feces), which acts as a fertilizer for the surrounding ocean or an adjacent lake.
Uric acid is the dominant nitrogen compound, and during its mineralization different nitrogen forms are produced.[65]
Ecosystems, even those with seemingly distinct borders, rarely function independently of other adjacent systems.[66] Ecologists are increasingly recognizing the important effects that cross-ecosystem transport of energy and nutrients have on plant and animal populations and communities.[67][68] A well known example of this is how seabirds concentrate marine-derived nutrients on breeding islands in the form of feces (guano) which contains ~15–20% nitrogen (N), as well as 10% phosphorus.[69][70][71] These nutrients dramatically alter terrestrial ecosystem functioning and dynamics and can support increased primary and secondary productivity.[72][73] However, although many studies have demonstrated nitrogen enrichment of terrestrial components due to guano deposition across various taxonomic groups,[72][74][75][76] only a few have studied its retroaction on marine ecosystems and most of these studies were restricted to temperate regions and high nutrient waters.[69][77][78][79] In the tropics, coral reefs can be found adjacent to islands with large populations of breeding seabirds, and could be potentially affected by local nutrient enrichment due to the transport of seabird-derived nutrients in surrounding waters. Studies on the influence of guano on tropical marine ecosystems suggest nitrogen from guano enriches seawater and reef primary producers.[77][80][81]
Reef building corals have essential nitrogen needs and, thriving in nutrient-poor tropical waters[82] where nitrogen is a major limiting nutrient for primary productivity,[83] they have developed specific adaptations for conserving this element. Their establishment and maintenance are partly due to their symbiosis with unicellular dinoflagellates, Symbiodinium spp. (zooxanthellae), that can take up and retain dissolved inorganic nitrogen (ammonium and nitrate) from the surrounding waters.[84][85][86] These zooxanthellae can also recycle the animal wastes and subsequently transfer them back to the coral host as amino acids,[87] ammonium or urea.[88] Corals are also able to ingest nitrogen-rich sediment particles[89][90] and plankton.[91][92] Coastal eutrophication and excess nutrient supply can have strong impacts on corals, leading to a decrease in skeletal growth,[85][93][94][95][81]
Pathways for guano-derived nitrogen to enter marine food webs[81]
Seabird colonies are nutrient hot spots, especially, for nitrogen and phosphorus[65]
Coastal predators
Food web theory predicts that current global declines in marine predators could generate unwanted consequences for many marine ecosystems. In coastal plant communities, such as kelp, seagrass meadows, mangrove forests and salt marshes, several studies have documented the far-reaching effects of changing predator populations. Across coastal ecosystems, the loss of marine predators appears to negatively affect coastal plant communities and the ecosystem services they provide.[96]
The
green world hypothesis predicts loss of predator control on
herbivores could result in runaway consumption that would eventually denude a landscape or seascape of vegetation.[97] Since the inception of the green world hypothesis, ecologists have tried to understand the prevalence of indirect and alternating effects of predators on lower trophic levels (
trophic cascades), and their overall impact on ecosystems.[98] Multiple lines of evidence now suggest that top predators are key to the persistence of some ecosystems.[98][96]
With an estimated habitat loss greater than 50 percent, coastal plant communities are among the world’s most endangered ecosystems.[99][100][101] As bleak as this number is, the predators that patrol coastal systems have fared far worse. Several predatory taxa including species of
marine mammals,
elasmobranchs, and
seabirds have declined by 90 to 100 percent compared to historical populations.[10][102] Predator declines pre-date habitat declines,[10] suggesting alterations to predator populations may be a major driver of change for coastal systems.[103][104][96]
There is little doubt that collapsing marine predator populations results from
overharvesting by humans. Localized declines and extinctions of coastal predators by humans began over 40,000 years ago with subsistence harvesting.[105] However, for most large bodied, marine predators (
toothed whales, large
pelagic fish, sea birds,
pinnipeds, and
otters) the beginning of their sharp global declines occurred over the last century, coinciding with the expansion of coastal human populations and advances in
industrial fishing.[10][106] Following global declines in marine predators, evidence of trophic cascades in coastal ecosystems started to emerge,[107][108][109][110] with the disturbing realisation that they affected more than just populations of lower trophic levels.[98][96]
Understanding the importance of predators in coastal plant communities has been bolstered by their documented ability to influence ecosystem services. Multiple examples have shown that changes to the strength or direction of predator effects on lower trophic levels can influence
coastal erosion,[111]carbon sequestration,[112][113] and
ecosystem resilience.[114] The idea that the
extirpation of predators can have far-reaching effects on the persistence of coastal plants and their ecosystem services has become a major motivation for their conservation in coastal systems.[98][113][96]
Seascape ecology is the marine and coastal version of
landscape ecology.[117] It is currently emerging as an interdisciplinary and spatially explicit ecological science with relevance to marine management, biodiversity conservation, and restoration.[116] Seascapes are complex ocean spaces, shaped by dynamic and interconnected patterns and processes operating across a range of spatial and temporal scales.[118][119][120] Rapid advances in geospatial technologies and the proliferation of sensors, both above and below the ocean surface, have revealed intricate and scientifically intriguing ecological patterns and processes,[121][122][123] some of which are the result of human activities.[124][125] Despite progress in the collecting, mapping, and sharing of ocean data, the gap between technological advances and the ability to generate ecological insights for marine management and conservation practice remains substantial.[126][127] For instance, fundamental gaps exist in the understanding of multidimensional spatial structure in the sea,[123][120][128] and the implications for planetary health and human wellbeing.[127] Deeper understanding of the multi-scale linkages between ecological structure, function, and change will better support the design of whole-system strategies for biodiversity preservation and reduce uncertainty around the consequences of human activity. For example, in the design and evaluation of marine protected areas (MPAs) and habitat restoration, it is important to understand the influence of spatial context, configuration, and connectivity, and to consider effects of scale.[129][130][131][132][116]
Fish migrations between coral reef, macroalgae, seagrass and mangrove habitats:[133] (a)
diel and tidal foraging migrations, (b)
ontogenetic migration of juvenile coral reef fish.
The ecosystem cascade to structure the stock-taking and scenario analysis steps in the marine spatial planning process.[134]
Interactions between ecosystems
The diagram on the right shows the principal interactions between mangroves, seagrass, and coral reefs.[135] Coral reefs, seagrasses, and mangroves buffer habitats further inland from storms and wave damage as well as participate in a tri-system exchange of mobile fish and invertebrates. Mangroves and seagrasses are critical in regulating sediment, freshwater, and nutrient flows to coral reefs.[135]
The diagram immediately below shows locations where mangroves, coral reefs, and seagrass beds exist within one km of each other. Buffered intersection between the three systems provides relative co-occurrence rates on a global scale. Regions where systems strongly intersect include Central America (Belize), the Caribbean, the Red Sea, the Coral Triangle (particularly Malaysia), Madagascar, and the Great Barrier Reef.[135]
The diagram at the right graphically illustrates the ecosystem service synergies between mangroves, seagrasses, and coral reefs. The ecosystem services provided by intact reefs, seagrasses, and mangroves are both highly valuable and mutually enhance each other. Coastal protection (storm/wave attenuation) maintains the structure of adjacent ecosystems, and associated ecosystem services, in an offshore-to-onshore direction. Fisheries are characterized by migratory species, and therefore, protecting fisheries in one ecosystem increases fish biomass in others. Tourism benefits from coastal protection and healthy fisheries from multiple ecosystems. Here, we do not draw within-ecosystem connections in order to better emphasise synergies between systems.[135]
To compound things, removal of biomass from the ocean occurs simultaneously with multiple other stressors associated to climate change that compromise the capacity of these socio-ecological systems to respond to perturbations.[137][138][139] Besides sea surface temperature, climate change also affects many other physical–chemical characteristics of marine
coastal waters (stratification, acidification, ventilation)[140][141] as well as the wind regimes that control surface water productivity along the productive coastal upwelling ecosystems.[142][143][144][145][146] Changes in the productivity of the oceans are reflected in changes of plankton biomass. Plankton contributes approximately half of the global primary production, supports marine food webs, influences the biogeochemical process in the ocean, and strongly affects commercial fisheries.[147][148][149] Indeed, an overall decrease in marine plankton productivity is expected over global scales.[141][147][150] Long-term increases and decreases in plankton productivity have already occurred over the past two decades[151][152] along extensive regions of the Humboldt upwelling ecosystem off Chile, and are expected to propagate up the pelagic and benthic food webs.[136]
Network ecology has advanced understanding of ecosystems by providing a powerful framework to analyse biological communities.[153] Previous studies used this framework to assess food web robustness against species extinctions, defined as the fraction of initial species that remain present in the ecosystem after a primary extinction.[154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161] These studies showed the importance for food web persistence of highly connected species (independent of trophic position),[154][157][162] basal species,[155] and highly connected species that, at the same time, trophically support other highly connected species.[158] Most of these studies used a static approach, which stems from network theory and analyzes the impacts of structural changes on food webs represented by nodes (species) and links (interactions) that connect nodes, but ignores interaction strengths and population dynamics of interacting species.[154] Other studies used a dynamic approach, which considers not only the structure and intensity of interactions in a food web, but also the changes in species biomasses through time and the indirect effects that these changes have on other species.[155][156][163][164][165][136]
Globally,
eutrophication is one of the major environmental problems in coastal ecosystems. Over the last century the annual
riverine inputs of
nitrogen and
phosphorus to the oceans have increased from 19 to 37
megatonnes of nitrogen and from 2 to 4 megatonnes of phosphorus.[166] Regionally, these increases were even more substantial as observed in the United States, Europe and China. In the Baltic Sea nitrogen and phosphorus loads increased by roughly a factor of three and six, respectively.[167] The riverine nitrogen flux has increased by an order of magnitude to coastal waters of China within thirty years, while phosphorus export has tripled between 1970 and 2000.[168][169][1]
Efforts to mitigate eutrophication through nutrient load reductions are hampered by the effects of
climate change.[9] Changes in precipitation increase the runoff of N, P and
carbon (C) from land, which together with warming and increased CO2 dissolution alter the coupled marine nutrient and carbon cycles.[170][171][1]
In contrast to the
open ocean where
biogeochemical cycling is largely dominated by
pelagic processes driven primarily by
ocean circulation, in the
coastal zone, pelagic and benthic processes interact strongly and are driven by a complex and dynamic physical environment.[172] Eutrophication in coastal areas leads to shifts toward rapidly growing opportunistic algae, and generally to a decline in benthic macrovegetation because of decreased light penetration, substrate change and more reducing sediments.[173][174] Increased production and warming waters have caused expanding
hypoxia at the seafloor with a consequent loss of
benthic fauna.[175][176] Hypoxic systems tend to lose many long-lived higher organisms and biogeochemical cycles typically become dominated by benthic bacterial processes and rapid pelagic turnover.[177] However, if hypoxia does not occur, benthic fauna tends to increase in biomass with eutrophication.[178][179][180][1]
Changes in
benthic biota have far-reaching impacts on biogeochemical cycles in the coastal zone and beyond. In the
illuminated zone, benthic
microphytes and
macrophytes mediate biogeochemical fluxes through
primary production, nutrient storage and
sediment stabilization and act as a habitat and food source for a variety of animals, as shown in the diagram on the left above. Benthic animals contribute to biogeochemical transformations and fluxes between water and sediments both directly through their metabolism and indirectly by physically reworking the sediments and their porewaters and stimulating bacterial processes. Grazing on pelagic organic matter and biodeposition of feces and pseudofeces by suspension-feeding fauna increases organic matter sedimentation rates.[181][182] In addition, nutrients and carbon are retained in biomass and transformed from organic to inorganic forms through metabolic processes.[183][180][184]Bioturbation, including sediment reworking and burrow ventilation activities (
bioirrigation), redistributes particles and solutes within the sediment and enhances sediment-water fluxes of solutes.[185][186] Bioturbation can also enhance resuspension of particles, a phenomenon termed "bioresuspension".[187] Together, all these processes affect physical and chemical conditions at the sediment-water interface,[188] and strongly influence organic matter degradation.[189] When up-scaled to the ecosystem level, such modified conditions can significantly alter the functioning of coastal ecosystems and ultimately, the role of the coastal zone in filtering and transforming nutrients and carbon.[1]
Direct human impacts and the full suite of drivers of global change are the main cause of species extinctions in
Anthropocene ecosystems,[190][105] with detrimental consequences on ecosystem functioning and their services to human societies.[191][192] The world fisheries crisis is among those consequences, which cuts across fishing strategies, oceanic regions, species, and includes countries that have little regulation and those that have implemented rights-based co-management strategies to reduce
overharvesting.[193][194][195][196][136]
Chile has been one of the countries implementing Territorial Use Rights (TURFs)[197][198] over an unprecedented geographic scale to manage the diverse coastal benthic resources using a co-management strategy.[199][200] These TURFS are used for artisanal fisheries. Over 60 coastal benthic species are actively harvested by these artisanal fisheries,[201] with species that are extracted from intertidal and shallow subtidal habitats.[202][203] The Chilean TURFs system brought significant improvements in sustainability of this complex socio-ecological system, helping to rebuild benthic
fish stocks,[201][199] improving fishers’ perception towards sustainability and increasing compliance9, as well as showing positive ancillary effects on conservation of biodiversity.[204][205] However, the situation of most artisanal fisheries is still far from sustainable, and many fish stocks and coastal ecosystems show signs of
overexploitation and ecosystem degradation, a consequence of the low levels of cooperation and low enforcement of TURF regulations, which leads to high levels of
free-riding and illegal fishing.[206][207][208] It is imperative to improve understanding of the effects of these multi-species artisanal fisheries which simultaneously harvest species at all
trophic levels from kelp primary producers to top carnivores.[203][209][136]
Remote sensing of marine coastal environments[210]
"Internet of Things" communication network along the marine coast.[211] Red names identify dedicated platforms, blue cooperative platforms, and green cabled platforms. Dashed lines represent communication channels connecting platforms to a gateway using a specific wireless communication protocol depending on local availability and cost. The gateway is connected to a network server by any IP communication technology available. The network server connects to a number of specific application servers which make the data accessible through a web browser. The transmission channel employs an end-to-end
AES encryption protocol.
Coastal zones are among the most populated areas on the planet.[212][213] As the population continues to increase, economic development must expand to support human welfare. However, this development may damage the ability of the coastal environment to continue supporting human welfare for current and future generations.[214] The management of complex coastal and marine social-ecological systems requires tools that provide frameworks with the capability of responding to current and emergent issues.[215][210] Remote data collection technologies include
satellite-based remote sensing,
aerial remote sensing,
unmanned aerial vehicles,
unmanned surface vehicles,
unmanned underwater vehicles, and static sensors.[210]
Frameworks have been developed that attempt to address and integrate these complex issues, such as the
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment framework which links drivers, ecosystem services, and human welfare[216][210] However, obtaining the environmental data that is necessary to use such frameworks is difficult, especially in countries where access to reliable data and their dissemination are limited or non-existent[217] and even thwarted.[210] Traditional techniques of point sampling and observation in the environment do deliver high information content,[218] but they are expensive and often do not provide adequate spatial and temporal coverage, while remote sensing can provide cost-effective solutions, as well as data for locations where there is no or only limited information.[219][210]
Coastal observing systems are typically nationally funded and built around national priorities. As a result, there are presently significant differences between countries in terms of sustainability, observing capacity and technologies, as well as methods and research priorities.[211] Ocean observing systems in coastal areas need to move toward integrated,
multidisciplinary and
multiscale systems, where heterogeneity can be exploited to deliver fit-for-purpose answers.[211] Essential elements of such distributed observation systems are the use of
machine-to-machine communication,
data fusion and processing applying recent technological developments for the
Internet of Things (IoT) toward a common
cyberinfrastructure.[211] It has been argued that the standardisation that IoT brings to
wireless sensing will revolutionise areas like this.[220]
Coastal areas are the most dynamic and productive parts of the oceans, which makes them a significant source of human resources and services. Coastal waters are located immediately in contact with human populations and exposed to anthropogenic disturbances, placing these resources and services under threat.[221] These concerns explain why, in several coastal regions, a rapidly increasing number of observing systems have been implemented in the last decade.[222] Expansion of coherent and sustained coastal observations has been fragmented and driven by national and regional policies and is often undertaken through short-term research projects.[223] This results in significant differences between countries both in terms of sustainability and observing technologies, methods and research priorities.[211]
Unlike the open ocean, where challenges are rather well-defined and stakeholders are fewer and well-identified, coastal processes are complex, acting on several spatial and temporal scales, with numerous and diversified users and stakeholders, often with conflicting interests. To adapt to such complexity coastal ocean observing system must be an integrated, multidisciplinary and multiscale system of systems.[224][211]
Marine ecosystems are affected by diverse pressures and consequently may undergo significant changes that can be interpreted as
regime shifts.[225] Marine ecosystems worldwide are affected by increasing natural and anthropogenic pressures and consequently undergo significant changes at unprecedented rates. Affected by these changes, ecosystems can reorganise and still maintain the same function, structure, and identity.[226] However, under some circumstances, the ecosystem may undergo changes that modify the system’s structure and function and this process can be described as a shift to a new regime.[226][227][228][225]
Usually, a regime shift is triggered by large-scale climate-induced variations,[229] intense fishing exploitation[230] or both.[231] Criteria used to define regime shifts vary and the changes that have to occur in order to consider that a system has undergone a regime shift are not well-defined.[232] Normally, regime shifts are defined as high amplitude, low-frequency and often abrupt changes in species abundance and community composition that are observed at multiple trophic levels (TLs).[233] These changes are expected to occur on a large spatial scale and take place concurrently with physical changes in the climate system.[233][228][234][235][236][237][232][225]
Regime shifts have been described in several marine ecosystems including Northern
Benguela,[238] the North Sea,[239] and the Baltic Sea.[240] In large
upwelling ecosystems, it is common to observe
decadal fluctuations in
species abundance and their replacements.[241] These fluctuations might be irreversible and might be an indicator of the new regime, as was the case in the Northern Benguela ecosystem.[238] However, changes in the upwelling systems might be interpreted as fluctuations within the limits of natural variability for an ecosystem, and not as an indicator of the regime shift.[234] The Portuguese continental shelf ecosystem (PCSE) constitutes the northernmost part of the
Canary Current Upwelling System and is characterised by seasonal upwelling that occurs during the spring and summer as a result of steady northerly winds.[242][243] It has recently changed in the abundance of coastal pelagic species such as
sardine,
chub mackerel,
horse mackerel,
blue jack mackerel and
anchovy.[244][245][246][247] Moreover, in the last decades, an increase in higher trophic level species has been documented.[248] The causes underlying changes in the pelagic community are not clear but it has been suggested that they result from a complex interplay between environmental variability, species interactions and
fishing pressure.[249][250][251][225]
There is evidence, that changes in the intensity of the Iberian coastal upwelling (resulting from the strengthening or weakening northern winds) had occurred in the last decades. However, the character of these changes is contradictory where some authors observed intensification of upwelling-favourable winds[252][253] while others documented their weakening.[254][255] A 2019 review of upwelling rate and intensity along the Portuguese coast documented a successive weakening of the upwelling since 1950 that lasted till mid/late 1970s in the north-west and south-west and till 1994 in the south coast.[256] An increase in upwelling index over the period 1985–2009 was documented in all studied regions while additionally upwelling intensification were observed in the south.[256] A continuous increase in water temperature, ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 °C per decade has also been documented.[257][225]
Threats and decline
Many marine fauna utilise coastal habitats as critical nursery areas, for shelter and feeding, yet these habitats are increasingly at risk from agriculture, aquaculture, industry and urban expansion.[258] Indeed, these systems are subject to what may be called "a triple whammy" of increasing industrialisation and urbanisation, an increased loss of biological and physical resources (fish, water, energy, space), and a decreased resilience to the
consequences of a warming climate and
sea level rise.[259] This has given rise to the complete loss, modification or disconnection of natural coastal ecosystems globally. For example, almost 10% of the entire
Great Barrier Reef coastline in Australia (2,300 km) has been replaced with urban infrastructure (e.g., rock seawalls, jetties, marinas), causing massive loss and fragmentation of sensitive coastal ecosystems.[260] Global loss of seagrass reached around 7% of seagrasses area per year by the end of the twentieth century.[261] A global analysis of tidal wetlands (
mangroves,
tidal flats, and
tidal marshes) published in 2022 estimated global losses of 13,700 km2 (5,300 sq mi) from 1999-2019, however, this study also estimated that these losses were largely offset by the establishment of 9,700 km2 (3,700 sq mi) of new tidal wetlands that were not present in 1999.[262] Approximately three-quarters of the 4,000 km2 (1,500 sq mi) net decrease between 1999 and 2019 occurred in Asia (74.1%), with 68.6% concentrated in three countries:
Indonesia (36%),
China (20.6%), and
Myanmar (12%).[262] Of these global tidal wetland losses and gains, 39% of losses and 14% of gains were attributed to direct human activities.[262]
Approximately 40% of the global mangrove has been lost since the 1950's[263] with more than 9,736 km2 of the world's mangroves continuing to be degraded in the 20 years period between 1996 and 2016.[264] Saltmarshes are drained when coastal land is claimed for agriculture, and deforestation is an increasing threat to shoreline vegetation (such as mangroves) when coastal land is appropriated for urban and industrial development,[263] both of which may result in the degradation of
blue carbon storages and increasing greenhouse gas emissions.[265]
These accumulating pressures and impacts on coastal ecosystems are neither isolated nor independent, rather they are synergistic, with feedbacks and interactions that cause individual effects to be greater than their sums.[266] In the year before the ecosystem restoration Decade commences, there is a critical knowledge deficit inhibiting an appreciation of the complexity of coastal ecosystems that hampers the development of responses to mitigate continuing impacts—not to mention uncertainty on projected losses of coastal systems for some of the worst-case future climate change scenarios.[267]
Restoration
The United Nations has declared 2021–2030 the
UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. This call to action has the purpose of recognising the need to massively accelerate global restoration of degraded ecosystems, to fight the climate heating crisis, enhance food security, provide clean water and protect biodiversity on the planet. The scale of restoration will be key. For example, the
Bonn Challenge has the goal to restore 350 million km2, about the size of India, of degraded terrestrial ecosystems by 2030. However, international support for restoration of
blue coastal ecosystems, which provide an impressive array of benefits to people, has lagged.
The diagram on the right shows the current state of modified and impacted coastal ecosystems and the expected state following the decade of restoration.[267] Also, shown is the uncertainty in the success of past restoration efforts, current state of altered systems, climate variability, and restoration actions that are available now or on the horizon. This could mean that delivering the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration for coastal systems needs to be viewed as a means of getting things going where the benefits might take longer than a decade.[267]
Only the Global Mangrove Alliance[268] comes close to the Bonn Challenge, with the aim of increasing the global area of mangroves by 20% by 2030.[267] However, mangrove scientists have reservations about this target, voicing concerns that it is unrealistic and may prompt inappropriate practices in attempting to reach this target.[269][267]
Conservation and connectivity
There has recently been a perceptual shift away from habitat representation as the sole or primary focus of conservation prioritisation, towards consideration of ecological processes that shape the distribution and abundance of biodiversity features.[270][271][272][273] In marine ecosystems, connectivity processes are paramount,[274] and designing systems of marine protected areas that maintain connectivity between habitat patches has long been considered an objective of conservation planning.[270][275] Two forms of connectivity are critical to structuring coral reef fish populations:[276] dispersal of larvae in the pelagic environment,[277] and post-settlement migration by individuals across the seascape.[278] Whilst a growing literature has described approaches for considering larval connectivity in conservation prioritisation,[279][280][281] relatively less attention has been directed towards developing and applying methods for considering post-settlement connectivity[274][282][283]
Seascape connectivity (connectedness among different habitats in a seascape, c.f. among patches of the same habitat type[131] is essential for species that utilise more than one habitat, either during diurnal movements or at different stages in their life history. Mangroves, seagrass beds, and lagoon reefs provide nursery areas for many commercially and ecologically important fish species that subsequently make
ontogenetic shifts to adult populations on coral reefs.[284][285][286] These back-reef habitats are often overlooked for conservation or management in favour of coral reefs that support greater adult biomass, yet they can be equally if not more at risk from habitat degradation and loss.[287][46][288] Even where juveniles are not targeted by fishers, they can be vulnerable to habitat degradation, for example from sedimentation caused by poor land-use practices.[289][283]
There is clear empirical evidence that proximity to nursery habitats can enhance the effectiveness (i.e. increasing the abundance, density, or biomass of fish species) of marine protected areas on coral reefs.[131][290][291][292][293] For example, at study sites across the western Pacific, the abundance of harvested fish species was significantly greater on protected reefs close to mangroves, but not on protected reefs isolated from mangroves.[292] The functional role of herbivorous fish species that perform ontogenetic migrations may also enhance the resilience of coral reefs close to mangroves.[294][295] Despite this evidence, and widespread calls to account for connectivity among habitats in the design of spatial management,[285][292][293] there remain few examples where seascape connectivity is explicitly considered in spatial conservation prioritisation (the analytical process of identifying priority areas for conservation or management actions).[283]
^Tappin, A.D. (2002). "An Examination of the Fluxes of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Temperate and Tropical Estuaries: Current Estimates and Uncertainties". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 55 (6): 885–901.
Bibcode:
2002ECSS...55..885T.
doi:
10.1006/ecss.2002.1034.
^Costanza, Robert; d'Arge, Ralph; De Groot, Rudolf; Farber, Stephen; Grasso, Monica; Hannon, Bruce; Limburg, Karin; Naeem, Shahid; O'Neill, Robert V.; Paruelo, Jose; Raskin, Robert G.; Sutton, Paul; Van Den Belt, Marjan (1997). "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital". Nature. 387 (6630): 253–260.
Bibcode:
1997Natur.387..253C.
doi:
10.1038/387253a0.
S2CID672256.
^Costanza, Robert; De Groot, Rudolf; Sutton, Paul; Van Der Ploeg, Sander; Anderson, Sharolyn J.; Kubiszewski, Ida; Farber, Stephen; Turner, R. Kerry (2014). "Changes in the global value of ecosystem services". Global Environmental Change. 26: 152–158.
doi:
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
S2CID15215236.
^Halpern, Benjamin S.; Walbridge, Shaun; Selkoe, Kimberly A.; Kappel, Carrie V.; Micheli, Fiorenza; d'Agrosa, Caterina; Bruno, John F.; Casey, Kenneth S.; Ebert, Colin; Fox, Helen E.; Fujita, Rod; Heinemann, Dennis; Lenihan, Hunter S.; Madin, Elizabeth M. P.; Perry, Matthew T.; Selig, Elizabeth R.; Spalding, Mark; Steneck, Robert; Watson, Reg (2008). "A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems". Science. 319 (5865): 948–952.
Bibcode:
2008Sci...319..948H.
doi:
10.1126/science.1149345.
PMID18276889.
S2CID26206024.
^
abcdLotze, Heike K.; Lenihan, Hunter S.; Bourque, Bruce J.; Bradbury, Roger H.; Cooke, Richard G.; Kay, Matthew C.; Kidwell, Susan M.; Kirby, Michael X.; Peterson, Charles H.; Jackson, Jeremy B. C. (2006). "Depletion, Degradation, and Recovery Potential of Estuaries and Coastal Seas". Science. 312 (5781): 1806–1809.
Bibcode:
2006Sci...312.1806L.
doi:
10.1126/science.1128035.
PMID16794081.
S2CID12703389.
^
abcdeUS Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
"What is the intertidal zone?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
^
abUS Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
"What is an estuary?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-22.
^
abUS Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
"Estuaries, NOS Education Offering". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-22.
^US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
"What is a lagoon?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-24.
^
abcdMiththapala, Sriyanie (2013).
"Lagoons and Estuaries"(PDF). IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 2016-11-23. Retrieved 2021-10-31.
^Sjöling, Sara; Mohammed, Salim M.; Lyimo, Thomas J.; Kyaruzi, Jasson J. (2005). "Benthic bacterial diversity and nutrient processes in mangroves: Impact of deforestation". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 63 (3): 397–406.
Bibcode:
2005ECSS...63..397S.
doi:
10.1016/j.ecss.2004.12.002.
^Strangmann, Antje; Bashan, Yoav; Giani, Luise (2008). "Methane in pristine and impaired mangrove soils and its possible effect on establishment of mangrove seedlings". Biology and Fertility of Soils. 44 (3): 511–519.
doi:
10.1007/s00374-007-0233-7.
S2CID18477012.
^d'Odorico, Paolo; He, Yufei; Collins, Scott; De Wekker, Stephan F. J.; Engel, Vic; Fuentes, Jose D. (2013). "Vegetation-microclimate feedbacks in woodland-grassland ecotones". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 22 (4): 364–379.
doi:
10.1111/geb.12000.
^Gedan, Keryn B.; Kirwan, Matthew L.; Wolanski, Eric; Barbier, Edward B.; Silliman, Brian R. (2011). "The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm". Climatic Change. 106 (1): 7–29.
Bibcode:
2011ClCh..106....7G.
doi:
10.1007/s10584-010-0003-7.
S2CID17867808.
^Lipcius, Romuald N.; Seitz, Rochelle D.; Seebo, Michael S.; Colón-Carrión, Duamed (2005). "Density, abundance and survival of the blue crab in seagrass and unstructured salt marsh nurseries of Chesapeake Bay". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 319 (1–2): 69–80.
doi:
10.1016/j.jembe.2004.12.034.
^
abMumby, Peter J. (2006). "Connectivity of reef fish between mangroves and coral reefs: Algorithms for the design of marine reserves at seascape scales". Biological Conservation. 128 (2): 215–222.
doi:
10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.042.
^
abUS Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
"What is a mangrove forest?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
^
abc"Mangroves". Smithsonian Ocean. 30 April 2018. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
^
abcd"What is a Salt Marsh?"(PDF). New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. 2004. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2021-10-31.
^
abUS Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
"What is a salt marsh?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2019-03-20.
^Mann, K.H. 1973. Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182: 975-981.
^Graham, M.H., B.P. Kinlan, L.D. Druehl, L.E. Garske, and S. Banks. 2007. Deep-water kelp refugia as potential hotspots of tropical marine diversity and productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 16576-16580.
^Christie, H., Jørgensen, N.M., Norderhaug, K.M., Waage-Nielsen, E., 2003. Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) along the Norwegian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 83, 687-699.
^Jackson, G.A. and C.D. Winant. 1983. Effect of a kelp forest on coastal currents. Continental Shelf Report 2: 75-80.
^Steneck, R.S., M.H. Graham, B.J. Bourque, D. Corbett,
J.M. Erlandson,
J.A. Estes and M.J. Tegner. 2002. Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environmental Conservation 29: 436-459.
^Sala, E., C.F. Bourdouresque and M. Harmelin-Vivien. 1998. Fishing, trophic cascades, and the structure of algal assemblages: evaluation of an old but untested paradigm. Oikos 82: 425-439.
^Dayton, P.K. 1985a. Ecology of kelp communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 215-245.
^Norderhaug, K.M., Christie, H., 2009. Sea urchin grazing and kelp re-vegetation in the NE Atlantic. Marine Biology Research 5, 515-528
^
abOtero, X.L., De La Peña-Lastra, S., Pérez-Alberti, A., Ferreira, T.O. and Huerta-Diaz, M.A. (2018) "Seabird colonies as important global drivers in the nitrogen and phosphorus cycles". Nature communications, 9(1): 1–8.
doi:
10.1038/s41467-017-02446-8. Material was copied from this source, which is available under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
^Barrett, Kyle; Anderson, Wendy B.; Wait, D. Alexander; Grismer, L. Lee; Polis†, Gary A.; Rose†, Michael D. (2005). "Marine subsidies alter the diet and abundance of insular and coastal lizard populations". Oikos. 109: 145–153.
doi:
10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13728.x.
^Polis, Gary A.; Hurd, Stephen D. (1996). "Linking Marine and Terrestrial Food Webs: Allochthonous Input from the Ocean Supports High Secondary Productivity on Small Islands and Coastal Land Communities". The American Naturalist. 147 (3): 396–423.
doi:
10.1086/285858.
S2CID84701185.
^Mizota, Chitoshi; Noborio, Kosuke; Mori, Yoshiaki (2012). "The Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) colony as a "hot spot" of nitrous oxide (N2O) emission in central Japan". Atmospheric Environment. 57: 29–34.
Bibcode:
2012AtmEn..57...29M.
doi:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.007.
^Bird, Michael I.; Tait, Elaine; Wurster, Christopher M.; Furness, Robert W. (2008). "Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of avian uric acid". Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 22 (21): 3393–3400.
Bibcode:
2008RCMS...22.3393B.
doi:
10.1002/rcm.3739.
PMID18837063.
^Wainright, S. C.; Haney, J. C.; Kerr, C.; Golovkin, A. N.; Flint, M. V. (1998). "Utilization of nitrogen derived from seabird guano by terrestrial and marine plants at St. Paul, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska". Marine Biology. 131: 63–71.
doi:
10.1007/s002270050297.
S2CID83734364.
^Hatcher, Bruce Gordon (1990). "Coral reef primary productivity. A hierarchy of pattern and process". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 5 (5): 149–155.
doi:
10.1016/0169-5347(90)90221-X.
PMID21232343.
^Falkowski, Paul G.; Dubinsky, Zvy; Muscatine, Leonard; McCloskey, Lawrence (1993). "Population Control in Symbiotic Corals". BioScience. 43 (9): 606–611.
doi:
10.2307/1312147.
JSTOR1312147.
^
abMarubini, F.; Davies, P. S. (1996). "Nitrate increases zooxanthellae population density and reduces skeletogenesis in corals". Marine Biology. 127 (2): 319–328.
doi:
10.1007/BF00942117.
S2CID85085823.
^Mills, Matthew M.; Lipschultz, Fredric; Sebens, Kenneth P. (2004). "Particulate matter ingestion and associated nitrogen uptake by four species of scleractinian corals". Coral Reefs. 23 (3): 311–323.
doi:
10.1007/s00338-004-0380-3.
S2CID13212636.
^Mills, M. M.; Sebens, K. P. (2004). "Ingestion and assimilation of nitrogen from benthic sediments by three species of coral". Marine Biology. 145 (6): 1097–1106.
doi:
10.1007/s00227-004-1398-3.
S2CID84698653.
^Ferrier-Pagès, C.; Witting, J.; Tambutté, E.; Sebens, K. P. (2003). "Effect of natural zooplankton feeding on the tissue and skeletal growth of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata". Coral Reefs. 22 (3): 229–240.
doi:
10.1007/s00338-003-0312-7.
S2CID44869188.
^Hairston, Nelson G.; Smith, Frederick E.; Slobodkin, Lawrence B. (1960). "Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition". The American Naturalist. 94 (879). University of Chicago Press: 421–425.
doi:
10.1086/282146.
ISSN0003-0147.
S2CID84548124.
^
abcdEstes, James A.; Terborgh, John; Brashares, Justin S.; Power, Mary E.; Berger, Joel; Bond, William J.; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Essington, Timothy E.; Holt, Robert D.; Jackson, Jeremy B. C.; Marquis, Robert J.; Oksanen, Lauri; Oksanen, Tarja; Paine, Robert T.; Pikitch, Ellen K.; Ripple, William J.; Sandin, Stuart A.; Scheffer, Marten; Schoener, Thomas W.; Shurin, Jonathan B.; Sinclair, Anthony R. E.; Soulé, Michael E.; Virtanen, Risto; Wardle, David A. (2011). "Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth". Science. 333 (6040): 301–306.
Bibcode:
2011Sci...333..301E.
doi:
10.1126/science.1205106.
PMID21764740.
S2CID7752940.
^Jackson, Jeremy B. C.; Kirby, Michael X.; Berger, Wolfgang H.; Bjorndal, Karen A.; Botsford, Louis W.; Bourque, Bruce J.; Bradbury, Roger H.; Cooke, Richard; Erlandson, Jon; Estes, James A.; Hughes, Terence P.; Kidwell, Susan; Lange, Carina B.; Lenihan, Hunter S.; Pandolfi, John M.; Peterson, Charles H.; Steneck, Robert S.; Tegner, Mia J.; Warner, Robert R. (27 July 2001). "Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems". Science. 293 (5530). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS): 629–637.
doi:
10.1126/science.1059199.
ISSN0036-8075.
PMID11474098.
S2CID1459898.
^
abAtwood, Trisha B.; Connolly, Rod M.; Ritchie, Euan G.; Lovelock, Catherine E.; Heithaus, Michael R.; Hays, Graeme C.; Fourqurean, James W.; MacReadie, Peter I. (2015). "Predators help protect carbon stocks in blue carbon ecosystems". Nature Climate Change. 5 (12): 1038–1045.
Bibcode:
2015NatCC...5.1038A.
doi:
10.1038/NCLIMATE2763.
^Hughes, Brent B.; Hammerstrom, Kamille K.; Grant, Nora E.; Hoshijima, Umi; Eby, Ron; Wasson, Kerstin (11 May 2016). "Trophic cascades on the edge: fostering seagrass resilience via a novel pathway". Oecologia. 182 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 231–241.
Bibcode:
2016Oecol.182..231H.
doi:
10.1007/s00442-016-3652-z.
ISSN0029-8549.
PMID27167224.
S2CID15168162.
^García-Charton, J. A.; Pérez-Ruzafa, Á.; Sánchez-Jerez, P.; Bayle-Sempere, J. T.; Reñones, O.; Moreno, D. (2004). "Multi-scale spatial heterogeneity, habitat structure, and the effect of marine reserves on Western Mediterranean rocky reef fish assemblages". Marine Biology. 144: 161–182.
doi:
10.1007/s00227-003-1170-0.
S2CID85630092.
^Somero, G. N. (2010). "The physiology of climate change: How potentials for acclimatization and genetic adaptation will determine 'winners' and 'losers'". Journal of Experimental Biology. 213 (6): 912–920.
doi:
10.1242/jeb.037473.
PMID20190116.
S2CID16838841.
^Bakun, Andrew; Field, David B.; Redondo-Rodriguez, ANA; Weeks, Scarla J. (2010). "Greenhouse gas, upwelling-favorable winds, and the future of coastal ocean upwelling ecosystems". Global Change Biology. 16 (4): 1213–1228.
Bibcode:
2010GCBio..16.1213B.
doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02094.x.
S2CID85126141.
^Thiel, M., Castilla, J.C., Fernández, M. and Navarrete, S., (2007). "The Humboldt current system of northern and central Chile". Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 45: 195-344
^Batten, Sonia D.; Abu-Alhaija, Rana; Chiba, Sanae; Edwards, Martin; Graham, George; Jyothibabu, R.; Kitchener, John A.; Koubbi, Philippe; McQuatters-Gollop, Abigail; Muxagata, Erik; Ostle, Clare; Richardson, Anthony J.; Robinson, Karen V.; Takahashi, Kunio T.; Verheye, Hans M.; Wilson, Willie (2019).
"A Global Plankton Diversity Monitoring Program". Frontiers in Marine Science. 6.
doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00321.
^Chust, Guillem; Allen, J. Icarus; Bopp, Laurent; Schrum, Corinna; Holt, Jason; Tsiaras, Kostas; Zavatarelli, Marco; Chifflet, Marina; Cannaby, Heather; Dadou, Isabelle; Daewel, Ute; Wakelin, Sarah L.; Machu, Eric; Pushpadas, Dhanya; Butenschon, Momme; Artioli, Yuri; Petihakis, George; Smith, Chris; Garçon, Veronique; Goubanova, Katerina; Le Vu, Briac; Fach, Bettina A.; Salihoglu, Baris; Clementi, Emanuela; Irigoien, Xabier (2014).
"Biomass changes and trophic amplification of plankton in a warmer ocean"(PDF). Global Change Biology. 20 (7): 2124–2139.
Bibcode:
2014GCBio..20.2124C.
doi:
10.1111/gcb.12562.
hdl:
11511/31726.
PMID24604761.
S2CID12403222.
^Weidberg, Nicolas; Ospina-Alvarez, Andres; Bonicelli, Jessica; Barahona, Mario; Aiken, Christopher M.; Broitman, Bernardo R.; Navarrete, Sergio A. (2020). "Spatial shifts in productivity of the coastal ocean over the past two decades induced by migration of the Pacific Anticyclone and Bakun's effect in the Humboldt Upwelling Ecosystem". Global and Planetary Change. 193: 103259.
arXiv:2104.11698.
Bibcode:
2020GPC...19303259W.
doi:
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103259.
S2CID224872806.
^
abcDunne, Jennifer A.; Williams, Richard J.; Martinez, Neo D. (2002). "Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance". Ecology Letters. 5 (4): 558–567.
doi:
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00354.x.
S2CID2114852.
^Falkowski, P.; Scholes, R. J.; Boyle, E.; Canadell, J.; Canfield, D.; Elser, J.; Gruber, N.; Hibbard, K.; Högberg, P.; Linder, S.; MacKenzie, F. T.; Moore Iii, B.; Pedersen, T.; Rosenthal, Y.; Seitzinger, S.; Smetacek, V.; Steffen, W. (2000). "The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a System". Science. 290 (5490): 291–296.
Bibcode:
2000Sci...290..291F.
doi:
10.1126/science.290.5490.291.
PMID11030643.
^Pearson, T. H., and Rosenberg, R. (1987). “Feast and famine: Structuring factors in marine benthic communities”, in Organization Of Communities:The 27th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Aberystwyth 1986, Eds: P. S. Giller and J. H. R. Gee (Oxford: Blackwell), 373–395.
^
abJosefson, A.B.; Rasmussen, B. (2000). "Nutrient Retention by Benthic Macrofaunal Biomass of Danish Estuaries: Importance of Nutrient Load and Residence Time". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 50 (2): 205–216.
Bibcode:
2000ECSS...50..205J.
doi:
10.1006/ecss.1999.0562.
^Newell R.I. (2004) "Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs: a review". Journal of Shellfish Research, 23(1): 51–62.
^Herman, P.M.J.; Middelburg, J.J.; Van De Koppel, J.; Heip, C.H.R. (1999). "Ecology of Estuarine Macrobenthos". Estuaries. Advances in Ecological Research. Vol. 29. pp. 195–240.
doi:
10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60194-4.
ISBN9780120139293.
^Villnäs, Anna; Norkko, Joanna; Hietanen, Susanna; Josefson, Alf B.; Lukkari, Kaarina; Norkko, Alf (2013). "The role of recurrent disturbances for ecosystem multifunctionality". Ecology. 94 (10): 2275–2287.
doi:
10.1890/12-1716.1.
hdl:10138/233616.
PMID24358713.
^Le Hir, P.; Monbet, Y.; Orvain, F. (2007). "Sediment erodability in sediment transport modelling: Can we account for biota effects?". Continental Shelf Research. 27 (8): 1116–1142.
Bibcode:
2007CSR....27.1116L.
doi:
10.1016/j.csr.2005.11.016.
^Worm, Boris; Hilborn, Ray; Baum, Julia K.; Branch, Trevor A.; Collie, Jeremy S.; Costello, Christopher; Fogarty, Michael J.; Fulton, Elizabeth A.; Hutchings, Jeffrey A.; Jennings, Simon; Jensen, Olaf P.; Lotze, Heike K.; Mace, Pamela M.; McClanahan, Tim R.; Minto, Cóilín; Palumbi, Stephen R.; Parma, Ana M.; Ricard, Daniel; Rosenberg, Andrew A.; Watson, Reg; Zeller, Dirk (2009). "Rebuilding Global Fisheries". Science. 325 (5940): 578–585.
Bibcode:
2009Sci...325..578W.
doi:
10.1126/science.1173146.
hdl:11336/100063.
PMID19644114.
S2CID2805799.
^Defeo, Omar; Castilla, Juan Carlos (2005). "More than One Bag for the World Fishery Crisis and Keys for Co-management Successes in Selected Artisanal Latin American Shellfisheries". Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 15 (3): 265–283.
doi:
10.1007/s11160-005-4865-0.
S2CID6912211.
^Defeo, Omar; Castrejón, Mauricio; Pérez-Castañeda, Roberto; Castilla, Juan C.; Gutiérrez, Nicolás L.; Essington, Timothy E.; Folke, Carl (2016). "Co-management in Latin American small-scale shellfisheries: Assessment from long-term case studies". Fish and Fisheries. 17: 176–192.
doi:
10.1111/faf.12101.
^Christy, F.T. (1982) "Territorial use rights in marine fisheries: definitions and conditions", Food and Agriculture Organisation, Fishing Technical Paper 227. United Nations, Rome.
^Gelcich, S.; Cinner, J.; Donlan, CJ; Tapia-Lewin, S.; Godoy, N.; Castilla, JC (2017). "Fishers' perceptions on the Chilean coastal TURF system after two decades: Problems, benefits, and emerging needs". Bulletin of Marine Science. 93: 53–67.
doi:
10.5343/bms.2015.1082.
^
abCastilla, Juan Carlos; Gelcich, Stefan; Defeo, Omar (2007). "Successes, Lessons, and Projections from Experience in Marine Benthic Invertebrate Artisanal Fisheries in Chile". Fisheries Management. pp. 23–42.
doi:
10.1002/9780470996072.ch2.
ISBN9780470996072.
^Gelcich, Stefan; Fernández, Miriam; Godoy, Natalio; Canepa, Antonio; Prado, Luis; Castilla, Juan Carlos (2012). "Territorial User Rights for Fisheries as Ancillary Instruments for Marine Coastal Conservation in Chile". Conservation Biology. 26 (6): 1005–1015.
doi:
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01928.x.
PMID22971114.
S2CID12693228.
^Oyanedel, Rodrigo; Keim, Andres; Castilla, Juan Carlos; Gelcich, Stefan (2018). "Illegal fishing and territorial user rights in Chile". Conservation Biology. 32 (3): 619–627.
doi:
10.1111/cobi.13048.
PMID29114934.
S2CID3703022.
^Castilla, Juan Carlos (1999). "Coastal marine communities: Trends and perspectives from human-exclusion experiments". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 14 (7): 280–283.
doi:
10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01602-x.
PMID10370266.
^
abLees, Kathryn; Pitois, Sophie; Scott, Catherine; Frid, Chris; MacKinson, Steven (2006). "Characterizing regime shifts in the marine environment". Fish and Fisheries. 7 (2): 104–127.
doi:
10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00215.x.
^
abMcKinnell, S.M; Brodeur, R.D; Hanawa, K.; Hollowed, A.B; Polovina, J.J; Zhang, C.-I (2001). "An introduction to the Beyond el Niño conference: Climate variability and marine ecosystem impacts from the tropics to the Arctic". Progress in Oceanography. 49 (1–4): 1–6.
Bibcode:
2001PrOce..49....1M.
doi:
10.1016/S0079-6611(01)00012-X.
^
abCury, Philippe; Shannon, Lynne (2004). "Regime shifts in upwelling ecosystems: Observed changes and possible mechanisms in the northern and southern Benguela". Progress in Oceanography. 60 (2–4): 223–243.
doi:
10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.007.
^Collie, Jeremy S.; Richardson, Katherine; Steele, John H. (2004). "Regime shifts: Can ecological theory illuminate the mechanisms?". Progress in Oceanography. 60 (2–4): 281–302.
doi:
10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.013.
^Deyoung, B.; Harris, R.; Alheit, J.; Beaugrand, G.; Mantua, N.; Shannon, L. (2004). "Detecting regime shifts in the ocean: Data considerations". Progress in Oceanography. 60 (2–4): 143–164.
doi:
10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.017.
^Wooster, Warren S.; Zhang, Chang Ik (2004). "Regime shifts in the North Pacific: Early indications of the 1976–1977 event". Progress in Oceanography. 60 (2–4): 183–200.
doi:
10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.005.
^
abHeymans, Johanna J.; Tomczak, Maciej T. (2016). "Regime shifts in the Northern Benguela ecosystem: Challenges for management". Ecological Modelling. 331: 151–159.
doi:
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.027.
^Wooster, W. S., Bakun, A., and McLain, R. M. (1976). "Seasonal upwelling cycle along the Eastern boundary of the North Atlantic". J. Mar. Res., 34: 131–141.
^Fiúza, A. F. D., de Macedo, M. E., and Guerreiro, M. R. (1982). "Climatological space and time variation of the Portuguese coastal upwelling". Oceanol. Acta, 5: 31–40.
^ICES (2008). ICES IBTSWG REPORT 2012, Report of the International Bottom Trawl Survey Working Group (IBTSWG). Lisbon: ICES, 27–30.
^ICES (2017). Report of the Working Group on Southern Horse Mackerel, Anchovy and Sardine (WGHANSA), 24–29 June 2017. Bilbao: ICES.
^Garrido, S.; Silva, A.; Pastor, J.; Dominguez, R.; Silva, AV; Santos, AM (2015). "Trophic ecology of pelagic fish species off the Iberian coast: Diet overlap, cannibalism and intraguild predation". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 539: 271–285.
Bibcode:
2015MEPS..539..271G.
doi:
10.3354/meps11506.
S2CID86970659.
^Leitão, F. (2015). "Landing profiles of Portuguese fisheries: Assessing the state of stocks". Fisheries Management and Ecology. 22 (2): 152–163.
doi:
10.1111/fme.12112.
^Leitão, Francisco (2015). "Time series analyses reveal environmental and fisheries controls on Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) catch rates". Continental Shelf Research. 111: 342–352.
Bibcode:
2015CSR...111..342L.
doi:
10.1016/j.csr.2015.08.026.
^Veiga-Malta, T.; Szalaj, D.; Angélico, MM; Azevedo, M.; Farias, I.; Garrido, S.; Lourenço, S.; Marçalo, A.; Marques, V.; Moreno, A.; Oliveira, PB; Paiva, VH; Prista, N.; Silva, C.; Sobrinho-Gonçalves, L.; Vingada, J.; Silva, A. (2019). "First representation of the trophic structure and functioning of the Portuguese continental shelf ecosystem: Insights into the role of sardine". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 617–618: 323–340.
Bibcode:
2019MEPS..617..323V.
doi:
10.3354/meps12724.
S2CID92274693.
^Miranda, P. M. A.; Alves, J. M. R.; Serra, N. (2013). "Climate change and upwelling: Response of Iberian upwelling to atmospheric forcing in a regional climate scenario". Climate Dynamics. 40 (11–12): 2813–2824.
Bibcode:
2013ClDy...40.2813M.
doi:
10.1007/s00382-012-1442-9.
S2CID140670266.
^Pires, Ana Cordeiro; Nolasco, Rita; Rocha, Alfredo; Dubert, Jesus (2013). "Assessing future climate change in the Iberian Upwelling System". Journal of Coastal Research. 165: 1909–1914.
doi:
10.2112/SI65-323.1.
S2CID131408682.
^Sydeman, W. J.; García-Reyes, M.; Schoeman, D. S.; Rykaczewski, R. R.; Thompson, S. A.; Black, B. A.; Bograd, S. J. (2014). "Climate change and wind intensification in coastal upwelling ecosystems". Science. 345 (6192): 77–80.
Bibcode:
2014Sci...345...77S.
doi:
10.1126/science.1251635.
PMID24994651.
S2CID206555669.
^Baptista, Vânia; Silva, Patrícia Laginha; Relvas, Paulo; Teodósio, M. Alexandra; Leitão, Francisco (2018). "Sea surface temperature variability along the Portuguese coast since 1950". International Journal of Climatology. 38 (3): 1145–1160.
Bibcode:
2018IJCli..38.1145B.
doi:
10.1002/joc.5231.
S2CID134746927.
^Waltham, Nathan J.; Sheaves, Marcus (2015). "Expanding coastal urban and industrial seascape in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: Critical need for coordinated planning and policy". Marine Policy. 57: 78–84.
doi:
10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.030.
^Atwood, Trisha B.; Connolly, Rod M.; Almahasheer, Hanan; Carnell, Paul E.; Duarte, Carlos M.; Ewers Lewis, Carolyn J.; Irigoien, Xabier; Kelleway, Jeffrey J.; Lavery, Paul S.; MacReadie, Peter I.; Serrano, Oscar; Sanders, Christian J.; Santos, Isaac; Steven, Andrew D. L.; Lovelock, Catherine E. (2017). "Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses". Nature Climate Change. 7 (7): 523–528.
Bibcode:
2017NatCC...7..523A.
doi:
10.1038/nclimate3326.
hdl:10072/346256.
^Lee, Shing Yip; Hamilton, Stu; Barbier, Edward B.; Primavera, Jurgenne; Lewis, Roy R. (29 April 2019). "Better restoration policies are needed to conserve mangrove ecosystems". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 3 (6). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 870–872.
doi:
10.1038/s41559-019-0861-y.
ISSN2397-334X.
PMID31036899.
S2CID139106235.
^
abMagris, Rafael A.; Pressey, Robert L.; Weeks, Rebecca; Ban, Natalie C. (2014). "Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning". Biological Conservation. 170: 207–221.
doi:
10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.032.
^Álvarez-Romero, Jorge G.; Pressey, Robert L.; Ban, Natalie C.; Vance-Borland, Ken; Willer, Chuck; Klein, Carissa Joy; Gaines, Steven D. (2011). "Integrated Land-Sea Conservation Planning: The Missing Links". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 42: 381–409.
doi:
10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144702.
^Pressey, Robert L.; Cabeza, Mar; Watts, Matthew E.; Cowling, Richard M.; Wilson, Kerrie A. (2007). "Conservation planning in a changing world". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 22 (11): 583–592.
doi:
10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.001.
PMID17981360.
^Almany, G. R.; Connolly, S. R.; Heath, D. D.; Hogan, J. D.; Jones, G. P.; McCook, L. J.; Mills, M.; Pressey, R. L.; Williamson, D. H. (2009). "Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs". Coral Reefs. 28 (2): 339–351.
Bibcode:
2009CorRe..28..339A.
doi:
10.1007/s00338-009-0484-x.
S2CID26332636.
^Grüss, Arnaud; Kaplan, David M.; Guénette, Sylvie; Roberts, Callum M.; Botsford, Louis W. (2011). "Consequences of adult and juvenile movement for marine protected areas". Biological Conservation. 144 (2): 692–702.
doi:
10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.015.
^
abOrtiz, Delisse M.; Tissot, Brian N. (2012). "Evaluating ontogenetic patterns of habitat use by reef fish in relation to the effectiveness of marine protected areas in West Hawaii". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 432–433: 83–93.
doi:
10.1016/j.jembe.2012.06.005.
^Pittman, Simon J.; Olds, Andrew D. (2015). "Seascape ecology of fishes on coral reefs". In Mora, Camilo (ed.). Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs. pp. 274–282.
doi:
10.1017/CBO9781316105412.036.
ISBN9781316105412.
^Nagelkerken, Ivan; Sheaves, Marcus; Baker, Ronald; Connolly, Rod M. (2015). "The seascape nursery: A novel spatial approach to identify and manage nurseries for coastal marine fauna". Fish and Fisheries. 16 (2): 362–371.
doi:
10.1111/faf.12057.
hdl:10072/60422.
^Hamilton, Richard J.; Almany, Glenn R.; Stevens, Don; Bode, Michael; Pita, John; Peterson, Nate A.; Choat, J. Howard (2016). "Hyperstability masks declines in bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) populations". Coral Reefs. 35 (3): 751–763.
Bibcode:
2016CorRe..35..751H.
doi:
10.1007/s00338-016-1441-0.
S2CID11931956.
^Martin, TSH; Olds, AD; Pitt, KA; Johnston, AB; Butler, IR; Maxwell, PS; Connolly, RM (2015). "Effective protection of fish on inshore coral reefs depends on the scale of mangrove-reef connectivity". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 527: 157–165.
Bibcode:
2015MEPS..527..157M.
doi:
10.3354/meps11295.
hdl:10072/124967.
^Olds, Andrew D.; Connolly, Rod M.; Pitt, Kylie A.; Maxwell, Paul S. (2012). "Habitat connectivity improves reserve performance". Conservation Letters. 5: 56–63.
doi:
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00204.x.
S2CID3958145.
^
abcOlds, Andrew D.; Albert, Simon; Maxwell, Paul S.; Pitt, Kylie A.; Connolly, Rod M. (2013). "Mangrove-reef connectivity promotes the effectiveness of marine reserves across the western Pacific". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 22 (9): 1040–1049.
doi:
10.1111/geb.12072.
hdl:10072/55829.
^Lindenmayer, David; et al. (2007). "A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation". Ecology Letters. 11 (1): 071010211025003––.
doi:
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x.
PMID17927771.