Lucy is an early
australopithecine and is dated to about 3.2 million years ago. The skeleton presents a small skull akin to that of non-hominin
apes, plus evidence of a walking-gait that was
bipedal and upright, akin to that of
humans (and other
hominins); this combination supports the view of human evolution that bipedalism preceded increase in
brain size.[4][5] A 2016 study proposes that Australopithecus afarensis was also, to a large extent,
tree-dwelling, though the extent of this is debated.[6][7]
Lucy was named by Pamela Alderman after the 1967 song "
Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" by
the Beatles, which was played loudly and repeatedly in the expedition camp all evening after the excavation team's first day of work on the recovery site.[8] After public announcement of the discovery, Lucy captured much international interest, becoming a household name at the time.
Lucy became famous worldwide, and the story of her discovery and reconstruction was published in a book by Johanson and Edey. Beginning in 2007, the fossil assembly and associated artefacts were exhibited publicly in an extended six-year tour of the United States; the exhibition was called Lucy's Legacy: The Hidden Treasures of Ethiopia. There was discussion of the risks of damage to the unique fossils, and other museums preferred to display casts of the fossil assembly.[9] The original fossils were returned to Ethiopia in 2013, and subsequent exhibitions have used casts.
In the 1920s,
Raymond Dart discovered the
Taung child. That skeleton seemed
bipedal (unlike chimps), but lacked
skull space for a powerful brain. Without further data to contextualize Dart's find, anthropologists could not prove whether bipedality, intelligence, or some other trait had first distinguished
proto-humans from their
great ape relatives.[10]
Organizing the expedition
French
geologist and
paleoanthropologistMaurice Taieb discovered the
Hadar Formation for
paleoanthropology in 1970 in the
Afar Triangle of
Ethiopia, then in
Hararghe province; he recognized its potential as a likely repository of the fossils and artifacts of human origins. Taieb formed the International Afar Research Expedition (IARE) and invited three prominent international scientists to conduct research expeditions into the region. Under his directorship, these were:
Donald Johanson (co-director), an American paleoanthropologist and curator at the
Cleveland Museum of Natural History, who later founded the
Institute of Human Origins, now part of
Arizona State University;
Yves Coppens (1934–2022, co-director), a French paleoanthropologist appointed in 1983 a professor at the
Collège de France, which is considered to be France's most prestigious research establishment, and
Mary Leakey, the noted British paleoanthropologist. An expedition was soon mounted with seven French and four American participants; in the autumn of 1973 the team began surveying sites around Hadar for signs related to the origin of humans.[11]
First find
In November 1973, near the end of the first field season, Johanson noticed a fossil of the upper end of a
shinbone, which had been sliced slightly at the front. The lower end of a
femur was found near it, and when he fitted them together, the angle of the knee joint clearly showed that this fossil, reference
AL 129-1, was an upright walking hominin. This fossil was later dated at more than three million years old—much older than other hominin fossils known at the time. The site lay about 2.5 kilometres (1.6 mi) from the site where "Lucy" subsequently was found, in a rock stratum 60 metres (200 ft) deeper than that in which the Lucy fragments were found.[12][13]
Subsequent findings
The team returned for the second field season the following year and found hominin
jaws. Then, on the morning of November 24, 1974, near the
Awash River, Johanson abandoned a plan to update his field notes and joined graduate student Tom Gray to search Locality 162 for bone fossils.[14][15][16][17][1][2]
By Johanson's later (published) accounts, both he and Tom Gray spent two hours on the increasingly hot and arid plain, surveying the dusty terrain. On a hunch, Johanson decided to look at the bottom of a small
gully that had been checked at least twice before by other workers. At first view nothing was immediately visible, but as they turned to leave a fossil caught Johanson's eye; an
arm bone fragment was lying on the slope. Near it lay a fragment from the back of a small skull. They noticed part of a femur (thigh bone) a few feet (about one meter) away. As they explored further, they found more and more bones on the slope, including
vertebrae, part of a
pelvis,
ribs, and pieces of jaw. They marked the spot and returned to camp, excited at finding so many pieces apparently from one individual hominin.[3][18]
In the afternoon, all members of the expedition returned to the gully to section off the site and prepare it for careful excavation and collection, which eventually took three weeks. That first evening they celebrated at the camp; at some stage during the evening they named fossil AL 288-1 "Lucy", after
the Beatles' song "
Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" (1967), which was being played loudly and repeatedly on a tape recorder in the camp.[19]
Over the next three weeks the team found several hundred pieces or fragments of bone with no duplication, confirming their original speculation that the pieces were from a single individual; ultimately, it was determined that an amazing 40 percent of a hominin skeleton was recovered at the site. Johanson assessed it as female based on the one complete pelvic bone and sacrum, which indicated the width of the pelvic opening.[19]
Assembling the pieces
Lucy was 1.1 m (3 ft 7 in) tall,[20] weighed 29 kg (64 lb), and (after reconstruction) looked somewhat like a
chimpanzee. The creature had a small brain like a chimpanzee, but the pelvis and leg bones were almost identical in function to those of modern humans, showing with certainty that Lucy's species were hominins that had stood upright and had walked erect.[21]
Reconstruction in Cleveland
With the permission of the government of Ethiopia, Johanson brought all the skeletal fragments to the
Cleveland Museum of Natural History in
Ohio, where they were stabilized and reconstructed by
anthropologistOwen Lovejoy. Lucy the pre-human
hominid and fossil hominin, captured much public notice; she became almost a household name at the time. Some nine years later, and now assembled altogether, she was returned to Ethiopia.[22]
Later discoveries
Additional finds of A. afarensis were made during the 1970s and forward, gaining for anthropologists a better understanding of the ranges of morphic variability and sexual dimorphism within the species. A more complete skeleton of a related hominid, Ardipithecus, was found in the same
Awash Valley in 1992. "
Ardi", like "Lucy", was a
hominid-becoming-hominin species, but, dated at 4.4 million years ago, it had evolved much earlier than the afarensis species. Excavation, preservation, and analysis of the specimen Ardi was very difficult and time-consuming; work was begun in 1992, with the results not fully published until October 2009.[23]
Age estimates of the fossil
Initial attempts were made in 1974 by Maurice Taieb and James Aronson in Aronson's laboratory at
Case Western Reserve University to estimate the age of the fossils using the
potassium-argon radiometric dating method. These efforts were hindered by several factors: the rocks in the recovery area were chemically altered or reworked by volcanic activity; datable crystals were very scarce in the sample material; and there was a complete absence of pumice clasts at Hadar. (The Lucy skeleton occurs in the part of the Hadar sequence that accumulated with the fastest rate of deposition, which partly accounts for her excellent preservation.)
Fieldwork at Hadar was suspended in the winter of 1976–77. When it was resumed thirteen years later in 1990, the more precise
argon-argon technology had been updated by Derek York at the
University of Toronto. By 1992 Aronson and Robert Walter had found two suitable samples of
volcanic ash—the older layer of ash was about 18 m below the fossil and the younger layer was only one meter below, closely marking the age of deposition of the specimen. These samples were argon-argon dated by Walter in the geochronology laboratory of the Institute of Human Origins at 3.22 and 3.18 million years.[24]
One of the most striking characteristics of the Lucy skeleton is a
valgus knee,[25] which indicates that she normally moved by walking upright. Her
femur presents a mix of ancestral and
derived traits. The
femoral head is small and the
femoral neck is short; both are
primitive traits. The
greater trochanter, however, is clearly a derived trait, being short and human-like—even though, unlike in humans, it is situated higher than the femoral head. The length ratio of her humerus (arm) to femur (thigh) is 84.6%, which compares to 71.8% for modern humans, and 97.8% for common chimpanzees, indicating that either the arms of A. afarensis were beginning to shorten, the legs were beginning to lengthen, or both were occurring simultaneously. Lucy also had a
lordose curve, or lumbar curve, another indicator of habitual bipedalism.[26] She apparently had physiological flat feet, not to be confused with
pes planus or any pathology, even though other afarensis individuals appear to have had arched feet.[27]
Johanson recovered Lucy's left
innominate bone and
sacrum. Though the sacrum was remarkably well preserved, the innominate was distorted, leading to two different reconstructions. The first reconstruction had little iliac flare and virtually no anterior wrap, creating an
ilium that greatly resembled that of an ape. However, this reconstruction proved to be faulty, as the
superior pubic rami would not have been able to connect were the right ilium identical to the left.
A later reconstruction by
Tim White showed a broad iliac flare and a definite
anterior wrap, indicating that Lucy had an unusually broad inner
acetabular distance and unusually long superior pubic rami. Her
pubic arch was over 90 degrees and derived; that is, similar to modern human females. Her acetabulum, however, was small and primitive.
Sacrum and spine
While examining Lucy's fossilized remains, it was believed that Lucy's
sacrum had five fused elements. The sacrum was found to be in good condition with little damage done. Although the sacrum had five fused elements, the
transverse processes of the most caudal element were not seen to connect to the segments craniad to it. This would result in researchers concluding that the sacrum suffered fossil damage which led to the fifth segment not connecting.
Although this was the case, in the mid-2010s studies came out with new theories as to why Lucy's fifth sacral segment is in that shape. Some researchers conclude that Lucy has only four sacral segments. Published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology,[28] researchers suggest that fossil damage did not shorten the transverse process and that Lucy's sacrum was in this state from the beginning. This specific study points to Lucy's sacrum having four sacral segments which researchers[28] say conforms with the "long-back" model of hominoid
vertebral evolution. There are some disagreements in the community about the fifth sacral segment and if fossil damage was enough to change the fifth segment or if it was originally in that state.[29] Discussed in the Journal,[28] researchers conclude that Lucy having only four sacral segments is consistent with other findings related to early
Miocenehominoids.
Lucy's back is associated with approximately 9
vertebrae. Although Lucy was found with a relatively intact and well preserved sacrum, she was missing pieces in her spinal column. Lucy's discoverers and later workers had given the vertebrae provisional level assignments to locations within the vertebral column.[30] Interestingly, some vertebrae were in worse conditions than others. Lucy had a worn out upper
thoracic neutral arch. Researchers have yet to find a cause as to why this particular vertebrae was in worse condition than the other pieces.[30] While accessing and restructuring Lucy's spinal column, it was noted to have been missing pieces that leave it incomplete. Not including an oddly worn out upper thoracic neutral arch, and the
lumbar vertebrae, the other remaining thoracic vertebrae were compiled to form an incomplete formation. The formation was arranged from the sixth thoracic vertebrae (T6) to its caudal end (T12), with the seventh thoracic vertebrae (T7) missing. As of 2015,[update] the continuity differs in the thoracic series between researchers and is being reevaluated.[30] Although there are new studies and reassessments being done,[30] it does not refute previous work or conclusions about Lucy's spine.
Australopithecus afarensis seems to have had the same conical rib-cage found in today's non-human
great apes (like the chimpanzee and gorilla), which allows room for a large stomach and the longer intestine needed for digesting voluminous plant matter. Fully 60% of the blood supply of non-human apes is used in the digestion process, greatly impeding the development of brain function (which is limited thereby to using about 10% of the circulation). The heavier musculature of the jaws—those muscles operating the intensive masticatory process for chewing plant material—similarly would also limit development of the braincase. During evolution of the human lineage these muscles seem to have weakened with the loss of the myosin gene
MYH16, a two base-pair deletion that occurred possibly about 2.4 million years ago.[31]
Other findings
A study of the
mandible across a number of specimens of A. afarensis indicated that Lucy's jaw was rather unlike other hominins, having a more gorilla-like appearance.[32] Rak et al. concluded that this
morphology arose "independently in gorillas and hominins", and that A. afarensis is "too
derived to occupy a position as a common ancestor of both the Homo and
robust australopith clades".[33]
Work at the American Museum of Natural History uncovered a possible Theropithecus vertebral fragment that was found mixed in with Lucy's vertebrae, but confirmed the remainder belonged to her.[34]
Death
Lucy's cause of death has not been determined. The specimen does not show the signs of post-mortem bone damage characteristic of animals killed by predators and then scavenged. The only visible damage is a single carnivore tooth mark on the top of her left pubic bone, believed to have occurred at or around the time of death, but which is not necessarily related to her death. Her third molars were erupted and slightly worn and, therefore, it was concluded that she was fully matured with completed skeletal development. There are indications of degenerative disease to her vertebrae that do not necessarily indicate old age. It is believed that she was a mature but young adult when she died.[35]
In 2016 researchers at the University of Texas at Austin suggested that Lucy died after falling from a tall tree.[36][37] Donald Johanson and Tim White disagreed with the suggestions.[38]
Exhibitions
The Lucy skeleton is preserved at the
National Museum of Ethiopia in
Addis Ababa. A plaster replica is publicly displayed there instead of the original skeleton. A cast of the original skeleton in its reconstructed form is displayed at the
Cleveland Museum of Natural History.[39] At the
American Museum of Natural History in
New York City a diorama presents Australopithecus afarensis and other human predecessors, showing each species and its habitat and explaining the behaviors and capabilities assigned to each. A cast of the skeleton as well as a corpus reconstruction of Lucy is displayed at
The Field Museum in Chicago.
US tour
A six-year exhibition tour of the United States was undertaken during 2007–13; it was titled Lucy's Legacy: The Hidden Treasures of Ethiopia and it featured the actual Lucy fossil reconstruction and over 100 artifacts from prehistoric times to the present. The tour was organized by the
Houston Museum of Natural Science and was approved by the Ethiopian government and the U.S. State Department.[40] A portion of the proceeds from the tour was designated to modernizing Ethiopia's museums.
There was controversy in advance of the tour over concerns about the fragility of the specimens, with various experts including paleoanthropologist
Owen Lovejoy and anthropologist and conservationist
Richard Leakey publicly stating their opposition, while discoverer Don Johanson, despite concerns for the possibility of damage, felt the tour would raise awareness of human origins studies. The
Smithsonian Institution,
Cleveland Museum of Natural History and other museums declined to host the exhibits.[9][41]
The Houston Museum made arrangements for exhibiting at ten other museums, including the
Pacific Science Center in
Seattle.[9] In September 2008, between the exhibits in Houston and Seattle, the skeletal assembly was taken to the
University of Texas at Austin for 10 days to perform high-resolution
CT scans of the fossils.[42]
Lucy was exhibited at the
Discovery Times Square Exposition in New York City from June until October 2009.[43] In New York, the exhibition included Ida (Plate B), the other half of the recently announced Darwinius masilae fossil.[44] She was also exhibited in Mexico at the Mexico Museum of Anthropology until its return to Ethiopia in May 2013.
Ethiopia celebrated the return of Lucy in May 2013.[45]
See also
Ardi – more complete skeleton of earlier hominin species
^Stern Jr., J. T.; Susman, R. L. (1983). "The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 60 (3): 279–317.
doi:
10.1002/ajpa.1330600302.
PMID6405621.
^Stedman HH, Kozyak BW, Nelson A, Thesier DM, Su LT, Low DW, Bridges CR, Shrager JB, Minugh-Purvis N, Mitchell MA (March 2004). "Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage". Nature. 428 (6981): 415–8.
Bibcode:
2004Natur.428..415S.
doi:
10.1038/nature02358.
PMID15042088.
S2CID4304466.
^Ferguson, W. W. (1989). "Critique of Australopithecus afarensis as a single species based on dental metrics and morphology". Primates. 30 (4): 561–569.
doi:
10.1007/BF02380881.
S2CID39160406.
^John Kappelman; Richard A. Ketcham; Stephen Pearce; Lawrence Todd; Wiley Akins; Matthew W. Colbert; Mulugeta Feseha; Jessica A. Maisano; Adrienne Witzel (2016). "Perimortem fractures in Lucy suggest mortality from fall out of tall tree". Nature. 537 (7621): 503–507.
Bibcode:
2016Natur.537..503K.
doi:
10.1038/nature19332.
PMID27571283.
S2CID4402700.
"PREMOG - Research". How Lucy walked. Primate Evolution & Morphology Group (PREMOG), the Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, the School of Biomedical Sciences at the
University of Liverpool. May 18, 2007. Archived from
the original on October 25, 2007. Retrieved November 1, 2007.
Thorpe S.K.S.; Holder R.L.; Crompton R.H. (May 24, 2007).
"PREMOG – Supplementry Info". Origin of Human Bipedalism As an Adaptation for Locomotion on Flexible Branches. Primate Evolution & Morphology Group (PREMOG), the Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, the School of Biomedical Sciences at the
University of Liverpool. Archived from
the original on July 17, 2007. Retrieved November 1, 2007. Based on computer simulations of the mechanics of motion in fossil human ancestors such as the famous 'Lucy' skeleton, our research group has long argued that early human ancestors would have walked upright, rather than semi-crouched, as the old 'up from the apes' view has suggested But we have not been able to say where such upright walking originated. Now, research on the orangutan, suggests that upright walking may have been a basic element of the lifestyle of the earliest ancestors of modern apes, including humans, which would have been tree-dwelling specialists on ripe fruit, living among the fine branches of tropical forest trees.
University of Texas's eLucy.org website Enables visitors to view bones and bone casts, and learn more about human origins and evolution. Activities and lessons are provided to encourage additional study.