The difference between
de Sitter precession and the Lense–Thirring effect is that the de Sitter effect is due simply to the presence of a central mass, whereas the Lense–Thirring effect is due to the rotation of the central mass. The total precession is calculated by combining the de Sitter precession with the Lense–Thirring precession.
According to a 2007 historical analysis by Herbert Pfister,[1] the effect should be renamed the
Einstein–Thirring–Lense effect.
The Lense–Thirring metric
The gravitational field of a spinning spherical body of constant density was studied by Lense and Thirring in 1918, in the
weak-field approximation. They obtained the metric[2][3]
The above is the weak-field approximation of the full solution of the
Einstein equations for a rotating body, known as the
Kerr metric, which, due to the difficulty of its solution, was not obtained until 1965.
The Coriolis term
The frame-dragging effect can be demonstrated in several ways. One way is to solve for
geodesics; these will then exhibit a
Coriolis force-like term, except that, in this case (unlike the standard Coriolis force), the force is not fictional, but is due to frame dragging induced by the rotating body. So, for example, an (instantaneously) radially infalling geodesic at the equator will satisfy the equation[2]
is the magnitude of the angular momentum of the spinning massive body.
The above can be compared to the standard equation for motion subject to the
Coriolis force:
where is the
angular velocity of the rotating coordinate system. Note that, in either case, if the observer is not in radial motion, i.e. if , there is no effect on the observer.
Precession
The frame-dragging effect will cause a
gyroscope to
precess. The rate of precession is given by[3]
where:
is the
angular velocity of the precession, a vector, and one of its components,
the angular momentum of the spinning body, as before,
the ordinary flat-metric
inner product of the position and the angular momentum.
That is, if the gyroscope's angular momentum relative to the fixed stars is , then it precesses as
The rate of precession is given by
where is the
Christoffel symbol for the above metric. Gravitation by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler[3] provides hints on how to most easily calculate this.
Gravitomagnetic analysis
It is popular in some circles to use the
gravitomagnetic approach to the
linearized field equations. The reason for this popularity should be immediately evident below, by contrasting it to the difficulties of working with the equations above. The linearized metric can be read off from the Lense–Thirring metric given above, where , and . In this approach, one writes the linearized metric, given in terms of the gravitomagnetic potentials and is
and
where
is the gravito-electric potential, and
is the gravitomagnetic potential. Here is the 3D spatial coordinate of the observer, and is the angular momentum of the rotating body, exactly as defined above. The corresponding fields are
for the gravito-electric field, and
is the gravitomagnetic field. It is then a matter of substitution and rearranging to obtain
as the gravitomagnetic field. Note that it is half the Lense–Thirring precession frequency. In this context, Lense–Thirring precession can essentially be viewed as a form of
Larmor precession. The factor of 1/2 suggests that the correct gravitomagnetic analog of the
gyromagnetic ratio is (curiously!) two.
The gravitomagnetic analog of the
Lorentz force is given by
where is the mass of a test particle moving with velocity . This can be used in a straightforward way to compute the classical motion of bodies in the gravitomagnetic field. For example, a radially infalling body will have a velocity ; direct substitution yields the Coriolis term given in a previous section.
Example: Foucault's pendulum
To get a sense of the magnitude of the effect, the above can be used to compute the rate of precession of
Foucault's pendulum, located at the surface of the Earth.
For a solid ball of uniform density, such as the Earth, of radius , the
moment of inertiais given by so that the absolute value of the angular momentum is with the angular speed of the spinning ball.
The direction of the spin of the Earth may be taken as the z axis, whereas the axis of the pendulum is perpendicular to the Earth's surface, in the radial direction. Thus, we may take , where is the
latitude. Similarly, the location of the observer is at the Earth's surface . This leaves rate of precession is as
As an example the latitude of the city of
Nijmegen in the Netherlands is used for reference. This latitude gives a value for the Lense–Thirring precession
At this rate a
Foucault pendulum would have to oscillate for more than 16000 years to precess 1 degree. Despite being quite small, it is still two orders of magnitude larger than
Thomas precession for such a pendulum.
The above does not include the
de Sitter precession; it would need to be added to get the total relativistic precessions on Earth.
The Lense–Thirring effect, and the effect of frame dragging in general, continues to be studied experimentally. There are two basic settings for experimental tests: direct observation via satellites and spacecraft orbiting Earth, Mars or Jupiter, and indirect observation by measuring astrophysical phenomena, such as
accretion disks surrounding
black holes and
neutron stars, or
astrophysical jets from the same.
The
Juno spacecraft's suite of science instruments will primarily characterize and explore the three-dimensional structure of Jupiter's polar
magnetosphere,
auroras and mass composition.[4]
As Juno is a polar-orbit mission, it will be possible to measure the orbital
frame-dragging, known also as Lense–Thirring precession, caused by the
angular momentum of Jupiter.[5]
Results from astrophysical settings are presented after the following section.
aj and ej are its semimajor axis and eccentricity.
A gaseous
accretion disk that is tilted with respect to a spinning black hole will experience Lense–Thirring precession, at a rate given by the above equation, after setting e = 0 and identifying a with the disk radius. Because the precession rate varies with distance from the black hole, the disk will "wrap up", until
viscosity forces the gas into a new plane, aligned with the black hole's spin axis (the "
Bardeen–Petterson effect").[8]
Astrophysical tests
The orientation of an
astrophysical jet can be used as evidence to deduce the orientation of an
accretion disk; a rapidly changing jet orientation suggests a reorientation of the accretion disk, as described above. Exactly such a change was observed in 2019 with the black hole X-ray binary in
V404 Cygni.[9]
Pulsars emit rapidly repeating radio pulses with extremely high regularity, which can be measured with microsecond precision over time spans of years and even decades. A 2020 study reports the observation of a pulsar in a tight orbit with a
white dwarf, to sub-millisecond precision over two decades. The precise determination allows the change of orbital parameters to be studied; these confirm the operation of the Lense–Thirring effect in this astrophysical setting.[10]
It may be possible to detect the Lense–Thirring effect by long-term measurement of the orbit of the
S2 star around the supermassive black hole in the center of the
Milky Way, using the GRAVITY instrument of the
Very Large Telescope.[11] The star orbits with a period of 16 years, and it should be possible to constrain the angular momentum of the black hole by observing the star over two to three periods (32 to 48 years).[12]