This file is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:15, May 21, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Why was this image flipped? The earth looks perfectly good "above" as "below", if not better. It helps demonstrate the fact that they are really in space.
Ergzay (
talk) 07:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Shadow?
what's casting that shadow on the left side? The Shuttle?
Vonfraginoff (
talk) 18:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)reply
My guess would be that the sun is actually to the left in this picture, the solar array is casting the shadow onto the radiators —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.120.182.253 (
talk) 13:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I second the Flipped Why?
I agree that the image should be natural and not flipped. There's obviously no universally standard frame of reference in space, so the earth being at the bottom of the picture makes no more sense than it does at the top.
Eric Statzer (
talk) 04:33, 20 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Better Image
First to address those who question why the image is "flipped." As has been pointed out, the whole concept of it being "flipped" makes no sense as, in space, orientation is entirely relative. However, there is a frame of reference - in this case, the Earth, and for aesthetic and human reasons it seems people prefer the "Earth-down, Space-objects-up" orientation. It doesn't really matter though.
As the person who nominated this picture to be featured, I feel that I should point out that since 2009 when this image was taken, some much better ones have come out that show a completed space station and are from a very similar vantage point, which when coupled with the higher quality, suggest it might be a good idea to replace this.
The thing is, this newer picture I am suggesting is also a featured picture, so I'm not sure how that would work.
Since I'm the guy who nominated this image in the first place I figured that, coming from me, this idea would resonate best.
After further consideration, I noticed that this image captures the ISS at an angle and configuration that demonstrates some significant details of the ISS that are less clear in the image I proposed as a replacement. In addition, the framing of this image is superior. I therefore retract my suggestion.
Spiral5800 (
talk) 13:06, 14 November 2011 (UTC)reply