This file is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This file is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to
Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
I find it hard to believe that the flag would be blowing in the wind, since as far as I know, there is no wind on the moon. --
24.222.149.188 13:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)reply
How do you know it's moving? That's a photo, not a video clip. Photos are still pictures, with no movement. On the other hand, videos are motion pictures, but this isn't one of those, so your claims are unfounded.--
Planetary 19:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Interesting. So you think it's stuck in a ruffled blown-like position? --
Laikalynx 00:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
No. If it was video, it might be moving. There's something called inertia around, and with no air to slow the flag down, it might keep moving for some time. Once stopped, it wouldn't budge without anymore interference.--
Planetary 01:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
"During the 2 1/2 hours in which they remained on the lunar surface (the "moon walk") Mr. Armstrong and Colonel Aldrin unveiled the plaque, signed by the three Apollo 11 astronauts and by President Nixon, the text of which is given on unfurled and planted on the moon a large American flag made of wire-backed nylon and measuring three feet by five feet;"
It was rolled up, and wire bound. Do the math. --
70.161.245.105 (
talk) 18:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Understood
Well, i used to have the same argue for the flag, never thought about the inertia thing... thanks Planetary. It sounds right!!! —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
66.178.31.195 (
talk) 08:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC).reply
Of course. Reality always turns out to be right. :) --
Planetary 13:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)reply
But doesn't that happen only in vacuum? Wouldn't the moon have some sort of gravity to pull the flag downward?
Of course the moon has gravity (1.6 m/s^2 to be exact). That's about a quarter of the earth's gravity, meaning that things fall at one quarter the rate that they do on earth (assuming air resistance is negligible). since d = (1/2)*a*t^2, the flag would have to be accelerating towards the surface of the moon (constrained by the pole, of course). The distance it would travel:
In 1/4 of a second: .05 m (2 inches)
1/2 sec: .2 m (8 inches)
1 sec: .8 m (2' 7.5")
2 sec: 3.2 m (10' 6")
However, the flag isn't moving downwards since it is fixed by a metal rod (look at the upper rim of the flag). So that's why it maintains the angle that it does. As stated before, inertia explains the ripples.
It'd be nice to have a citation on what made the flag stiff, I know that I hadn't thought of it before, but I find the flag's "wave" (or more like crumple, from the appearance) interesting and needing a concrete explanation.
--Ah, found lots of good content at the site itself, especially this picture of the flag makeup, which shows the upper bracing pole that I kinda could see in the pictures:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/assembly.gif