Original file (752 × 786 pixels, file size: 42 KB, MIME type: image/png)
This is a file from the
Wikimedia Commons. Information from its
description page there is shown below. Commons is a freely licensed media file repository. You can help. |
DescriptionTime for hand counts.png |
English: Sources are in table below, taken from
/info/en/?search=Vote_counting |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Numbersinstitute |
Team (Wall Clock) Minutes per Vote Checked | Team Size | Staff Minutes per Vote Checked | Number of Contests Checked per Ballot | Full Precincts /Batches, or Random Ballots | Type of Paper Ballot | Number of Ballots Checked | Total Staff Time, Minutes | Year | Sources | Overheads Excluded & Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Butler Cnty, PA, Butler City | 0.02 | 6 | 0.09 | 8 | Full batches | Sheets | 600 | 450 | 2022 | [2] [3] | 1 reads to 4-7. No report available, so times may be under-reported. Not on graph. |
Butler Cnty, PA, Donegal Twp | 0.02 | 4 | 0.08 | 8 | Full batches | Sheets | 1,061 | 660 | 2022 | [2] [3] | 1 reads to 4-7. No report available, so times may be under-reported. Not on graph. |
Dane County, WI | 0.04 | 5 | 0.20 | 1 | Full sets of images | Sheets | 1000 | 200 | 2015 | [4] [5] | Organizing ballot scans for review, training, legal, supervision |
Mohave County, AZ, experiment | 0.05 | 7 | 0.34 | 36 | Full batches | Sheets | 850 | 10,266 | 2023 | [6] | Excludes: detecting & retallying errors missed by team, space rental, paying workers to attend training, entering data on computer for web & SOS, creating blank tally sheets for each precinct. They estimate the following would add 33% to direct tallying cost: supervision, summation, sorting ballots by precinct, guards, transportation, background checks, webcams, recruitment |
Maricopa County, AZ recount | 0.08 | 5 | 0.42 | 2 | Full batches | Sheets | 1 | 0.83 | 2021 | [7] | Organizing ballots for review, training, legal, supervision, adding tally sheets |
New Hampshire | 0.09 | 3 | 0.27 | 20 | Full batches | Sheets | 627 | 3,360 | 2007 | [8] [9] | Add 60% to cover: supervision 43% + training 13% + sums 4% |
Carlisle, MA | 0.11 | 2 | 0.22 | 9 | Full batches | Sheets | 3,670 | 7,200 | 2020 | 8 teams of 2 plus 4 extra | |
Hancock, MA | 0.13 | 2 | 0.26 | 9 | Full batches | Sheets | 513 | 1,200 | 2020 | Organizing ballots for review, training, legal, supervision, adding tally sheets (10 teams of 2 | |
Provincetown, MA | 0.14 | 2 | 0.28 | 11 | Full batches | Sheets | 2,616 | 7,980 | 2020 | 16 teams of 2+2 runners+4 tallies | |
Tolland, CT | 0.11 | 7 | Full batches | Sheets | 3851 | 2,880 | 2012 | [10] | |||
Bloomfield, CT | 0.15 | 7 | Full batches | Sheets | 2272 | 2,400 | 2012 | [10] | |||
Vernon, CT | 0.31 | 6 | Full batches | Sheets | 2544 | 4,740 | 2012 | [10] | |||
Bridgeport, CT | 0.40 | 5 | 2.01 | 1 | Full batches | Sheets | 23860 | 48,000 | 2010 | [11] | Includes counting number of voters who checked in at polling places, and comparing those counts to ballot counts. |
Bibb County, GA | 0.18 | 3 | 0.54 | 39 | Full batches | Rolls | 592 | 12,480 | 2006 | [12] | |
Camden County, GA | 0.11 | 3 | 0.33 | 34 | Full batches | Rolls | 470 | 5,220 | 2006 | [12] | |
Cobb County, GA | 0.20 | 3 | 0.60 | 42 | Full batches | Rolls | 976 | 24,480 | 2006 | [12] | |
San Diego precincts | 0.22 | 3 | 0.67 | 19 | Full batches | Sheets | 2,425 | 30,573 | 2016 | [13] | |
Clark County, NV | 0.72 | 21 | Full batches | Rolls | 1,268 | 19,200 | 2004 | [14] | |||
Washington State recount | 1.49 | 1 | Full batches | Sheets | 1,842,136 | 2,741,460 | 2004 | [14] | |||
Orange County, CA | 1.93 | 1 | Full, mostly | Rolls mostly | 467 | 900 | 2011 | [15] | Independent count, done by graduate student on university computer | ||
Read to Talliers Experiment Second Contest | 0.07 | 4 | 0.30 | 1 | Full batches | Sheets | 1800 | 537 | 2012 | [16] | Organizing ballots for review, training, legal, supervision, adding tally sheets |
Read to Talliers Experiment First Contest | 0.12 | 4 | 0.48 | 1 | Full batches | Sheets | 1800 | 861 | 2012 | [16] | Organizing ballots for review, training, legal, supervision, adding tally sheets |
Sort & Stack Experiment Second Contest | 0.17 | 3 | 0.51 | 1 | Full batches | Sheets | 1920 | 972 | 2012 | [16] | Organizing ballots for review, training, legal, supervision, adding tally sheets |
Sort & Stack Experiment First Contest | 0.24 | 3 | 0.71 | 1 | Full batches | Sheets | 1920 | 1,369 | 2012 | [16] | Organizing ballots for review, training, legal, supervision, adding tally sheets |
COUNTING BALLOTS IN RANDOM ORDER | |||||||||||
Carroll County, MD | 1.03 | 2 | 2.06 | 3 | Random images | Sheets | 247 | 1,526 | 2016 | [17] | Organizing ballot scans for review, training, legal, supervision |
Montgomery County MD | 0.88 | 2 | 1.76 | 3 | Random images | Sheets | 82 | 432 | 2016 | [17] | Organizing ballot scans for review, training, legal, supervision |
Merced County, CA | 1.82 | 2 | Random ballots | Sheets | 198 | 720 | 2011 | [15] | Independent count, done by graduate student on university computer | ||
Humboldt County, CA | 5.87 | 3 | Random ballots | Sheets | 143 | 2,520 | 2011 | [15] | Independent count, done by graduate student on university computer |
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 04:11, 28 February 2024 | 752 × 786 (42 KB) | Numbersinstitute | Team time is more comparable than staff time | |
08:31, 27 October 2022 | 756 × 1,074 (92 KB) | Numbersinstitute | updated labels, added CT | ||
01:33, 2 June 2021 | 721 × 1,134 (86 KB) | Numbersinstitute | add Humboldt+MA+fix rounding errors | ||
21:12, 20 May 2021 | 727 × 1,159 (72 KB) | Numbersinstitute | Added AZ+NH, switched axes | ||
22:10, 13 April 2021 | 840 × 683 (51 KB) | Numbersinstitute | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it.
If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.
Horizontal resolution | 47.24 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 47.24 dpc |