1.No free equivalent. no, there is no freedom of panorama in the US.
2.Respect for commercial opportunities. yes, traffic to original enhanced
3.a.Minimal usage. three views of 3D object to adequately describe shape
b.Minimal extent of use. can't reproduce 3D object in 2D, lower resolution
4.Content. is encyclopedic.
5.Media-specific policy. meets Wikipedia:Image use policy.
6.One-article minimum. Non-free content is used in at least one article.
7.Contextual significance. hard to understand a 3D object without pictures
8.Restrictions on location. in article space
9.Image description page: The sculpture Pillar of Fire by American sculptor William Cochran. Left photo taken by Elvert Barnes on November 12, 2013.
Posted to flickr under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 License. Right photo taken by
AgnosticPreachersKid on January 15, 2017.
Licensing
(left photo)
This image by Elvert Barnes is a
derivative work of separately copyrighted work. It is, therefore, treated on Wikipedia as
non-free and each use within an article must satisfy the
non-free content criteria. Re-users of this content, in addition to needing a
fair use or similar legal claim to use the depiction of the copyrighted work, must also respect the rights of the derivative author by complying with the following terms:
This work is licensed under the
Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike 2.0 License. Attribution:
sourcehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/CC-BY-SA-2.0Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0truetrue
If this image is of an artwork on display in a public location in a jurisdiction that permits freedom of panorama (such as the UK), then please remove {{Photo of art}} tag, placing the photographer's 'free' license in this section of the media description page
The original work shown is under the following license:
This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per
US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works.
Per
§ 107 it is believed that reproduction for criticism, comment, teaching and scholarship constitutes fair use and does not infringe copyright.
It is believed that the use of a picture
to illustrate the three-dimensional work of art in question,
to discuss the artistic genre or technique of the work of art
or to discuss the artist or the school to which the artist belongs
Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons. The subject of this image is still protected by copyright. Commons does not accept 'fair-use' images.
(right photo)
This image by AgnosticPreachersKid is a
derivative work of separately copyrighted work. It is, therefore, treated on Wikipedia as
non-free and each use within an article must satisfy the
non-free content criteria. Re-users of this content, in addition to needing a
fair use or similar legal claim to use the depiction of the copyrighted work, must also respect the rights of the derivative author by complying with the following terms:
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
If this is not legally possible:
I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.
PDPublic domainfalsefalse
If this image is of an artwork on display in a public location in a jurisdiction that permits freedom of panorama (such as the UK), then please remove {{Photo of art}} tag, placing the photographer's 'free' license in this section of the media description page
The original work shown is under the following license:
This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per
US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works.
Per
§ 107 it is believed that reproduction for criticism, comment, teaching and scholarship constitutes fair use and does not infringe copyright.
It is believed that the use of a picture
to illustrate the three-dimensional work of art in question,
to discuss the artistic genre or technique of the work of art
or to discuss the artist or the school to which the artist belongs
== Summary == '''Fair use rationale in
Pillar of Fire (sculpture):''' *1.'''No free equivalent'''. no, there is no freedom of panaroma in the US. *2.'''Respect for commercial opportunities'''. yes, traffic to original enhanced *3.a.'''Minimal usage...
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed):