Elementa harmonica is a
treatise on the subject of
musical scales by
Aristoxenus, of which considerable amounts are extant.
The work dates to the second half of the
4th century BC.[1] It is the oldest substantially surviving work written on the subject of music theory.[2]
The work is generally known as Aristoxenou Harmonika Stoicheia or Elements of Harmonics.[3][4][5] It is also known by the shorter title The Elements, rendering Greek Στοιχεία.[6]
The Work
Historical context
Aristoxenus's work departs from prior studies in which music was studied only in relation to an understanding of the kosmos. The study of music in the
Pythagorean school c.500 had focused on the mathematical nature of harmonia.
Aristotle, whose
Peripatetic school Aristoxenus belonged to, addressed the subject in his work On the Soul. Aristoxenus opposed the position of the Pythagoreans; he favoured an intellectual treatment of the subject in Aristotelian terms, i.e. by applying the exercise of
inductive logic with attention to
empirical evidence.[7][8][9][10][11][12][self-published source][13][14] As such, the Elements is the first and earliest work on music in the classical Greek tradition.
Musicology as a discipline comes into being with the systematic study undertaken in the work.
Description
The work is a theoretical treatise concerned with
harmony and harmonics, and thus pertains to a burgeoning theory of
euphonics. The study of harmonics is especially concerned with treating melody in order to find its components (the Greek word for melody is μέλος).[6][12][15]
In the first sentence of the treatise Aristoxenus identifies Harmony as belonging under the general scope of the study of the science of
Melody. Aristoxenus considers notes to fall along a continuum available to
auditory perception. Aristoxenus identified the three tetrachords in the treatise as diatonic, the chromatic, and the enharmonic.[3][4][16]
Aristoxenus aims to attempt an empirical study based upon observation. As such, his writing contains criticisms of earlier approaches and attitudes, including those of the Pythagorean and harmonikoi, on the problems of sound perceptible as music.[17][18][19]
Synopsis
The work comprises 3 books. Book II seems not to follow from Book I, and it is quite widely but not unanimously assumed that Book I is a separate work from Book II & III.[19]
(1) The Genera - the ways in which the differences between these are determined
(2) Distantia (Intervals) - the distinction of how these are differentiated
(3) Notes - dynameis
(4) Systēmata - enumerating and distinguishing the types, and explaining how they are put together out of Notes and Intervals
(5)
Tonoi (Modes) - including the relations between them
(6) Modulation
(7) Construction / Composition
Discussion
The use of dynamis (pl. dynameis) as a musical term seems to have been originated by Aristoxenus. The term normally denotes power and potentiality. Sidoli contends in his review (cf. ref.) that the initial use of the concept by Aristoxenus was rather "elusive."[21][22][23]
Later Reception
Vitruvius (circa. mid-20s
B.C.[24]) based his understanding of the laws of harmony on the Elements of Aristoxenus.[25]
The Elements was studied earnestly during
the Renaissance by theoreticians and musicians.[17] Renaissance thinkers were faced with a choice between following Pythagoras or Aristoxenus.[26]
There are editions of the Greek text by Marcus Meibom (1652); Paul Marquard, Aristoxenou harmonikōn ta sōzomena: Die harmonischen fragmente des Aristoxenus (1868), with German translation; Rudolf Westphal (Leipzig, 1883); and Henry Stewart Macran (Oxford, 1902). An edition was published in Latin during 1954, and another in the same year in Italian, by Typis Publicae Officinae Polygraphicae.[19][28][29][30]
There is an English translation by
Andrew Barker in his Greek Musical Writings (volume 1 published 1984, volume 2 1989).[31][32]
Modern Studies
Louis Laloy, Aristoxène de Tarent et la Musique de l'antiquité (Paris, 1904).
R.P. Winnington-Ingram, "Aristoxenus and the Intervals of Greek Music", Classical Quarterly 26 (1932), 195–208.
Norman Cazden, "Pythagoras and Aristoxenos Reconciled", Journal of Music Theory 32. 1 (1958), 51–73.[33][34]
Annie Bélis, Aristoxene de Tarante et Aristote: Le Traité d’harmonique, Études et commentaires 100 (Paris, 1986).[35]
John G. Landels, Music in Ancient Greece and Rome (London and New York, 1999). Deals with intervals in The Elements.[20]
D. Creese, "Instruments and Empiricism in Aristoxenus' Elementa Harmonica" (2012). Online.[36]
^
abM.C. Howatson (22 August 2013). The Oxford Companion to Classical Literature. Oxford University Press (reprint). p. 73.
ISBN978-0199548552. Oxford Paperback Reference
^Erik Nis Ostenfeld, Plato (The Republic - Ergon and dynamis)-
Forms, Matter and MindVolume 10 of Martinus Nijhoff philosophy library Springer Science & Business Media, 1982
ISBN940097681X [Retrieved 2015-05-08]
^A. Barker -
staff profile University of Birmingham [Retrieved 2015-05-04]
^M Litchfield (1988). "Aristoxenus and Empiricism: A Reevaluation Based on His Theories". Journal of Music Theory. 32 (1). Journal of Music Theory Vol. 32, No. 1 (Spring, 1988), pp. 51-73 Published by: Duke University Press: 51–73.
doi:
10.2307/843385.
JSTOR843385.
^N Cazden (1958). "Pythagoras and Aristoxenos Reconciled". Journal of the American Musicological Society. 11 (2/3). Journal of the American Musicological Society Vol. 11, No. 2/3 (Summer - Autumn, 1958), pp. 97-105 Published by: University of California Press: 97–105.
doi:
10.2307/829897.
JSTOR829897.
^Lilian Voudouri -
Music Library of Greece Friends of Music Society (Athens) [Retrieved 2015-05-04]