Submission declined on 26 April 2024 by CNMall41 (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Comment: References to show notability must meet
WP:ORGCRIT. The references used here are routine announcements and do not meet that threshold.
CNMall41 (
talk) 18:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Technology company
UserTesting is a technology company, based in
San Francisco, California, that provides a user research platform.
History
UserTesting was founded in 2007.[1] The company initially gathered usability feedback about websites, paying users to complete online tasks while recording their on-screen actions and voice. They would use this information to rate the usability of the website. Users were also gauged on how helpful their feedback was towards future product development.[2]
In 2019 the company acquired TruthLab, and in March of 2022, UserTesting acquired Norway-based Teston.[3][4] Also in 2020, UserTesting was named one of the 500 fastest growing companies in the United States by the Financial Times.[5]
The company’s
IPO went public on November 17, 2021.[6] In 2022 the company sold to a private equity firm for $1.3 billion.[7] In 2023 the company launched a set of generative AI features within its core platform.[8]
Testers
The UserTesting network of testers complete approximately 1.5 million sessions annually.[4] As a result of the merger with UserZoom, the company also has registered users to test via UserZoom.[9]
Funding
By 2012 the company had attracted $3 million in funding.[2] In 2015 it received a funding round of $45.5 million.[10] In 2020 the company added another $100 million in funding. [4] It has also received government funding from institutions, such as
Scottish Enterprise.[11]