Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: New sources added are either
WP:ROUTINE coverage (profiles), connected to the source via interview or otherwise (fails
WP:IS) or just mention Ong (i.e talking about his research or his team). Don't believe the two sources about research meets 1st point of
WP:NACADEMIC either.
EmeraldRange (
talk/
contribs) 14:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Exclusively reliant on profiles and self-published materials, which are insufficient in demonstrating notability. Make sure to include multiple significant coverage from reliable and independent sources to prove that the subject passes
WP:NACADEMIC or
WP:NBIO. For the claims that are marked with citation needed, add supporting citations, otherwise they need to be removed.
Tutwakhamoe (
talk) 02:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Notable professor in materials science and engineering
Ong's research focuses on
Materials informatics and more broadly the intersection between
data science,
ML/
AI, and
the physical sciences. He has used this approach to develop and characterize materials for applications in energy. He helps lead the
Materials Project, focused on rapid discovery of advanced materials for sustainable, clean energy to better humanity.[11][9][10] As part of the
Materials Project he is the lead developer and maintainer of the pymatgen, an
open sourcepython platform for materials analysis.[12]
Ong's previous work has indicated that Na-ion batteries are possible competitive alternatives to
Li-ion batteries, as they demonstrate lower voltages, structural dependencies, and possibly lower migration barriers for Na+ ions in layered structures.[13] He has also worked on improving Li-ion battery materials.
Ong is the co-developer of the MEGNet and universal M3GNet graph neural network interatomic potentials.[14][15][16] Professor Ong and his co-author argue M3GNet enables efficient material discovery across diverse chemistries by leveraging machine learning for structural relaxation, dynamic simulations, and property prediction.[16] More recently, MEGNet and M3GNet have been superseded by a more general and performant framework, MatGL to use graph neural network potentials.[17]