Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,283 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 29 April 2024 by
ToadetteEdit (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Thoth Open Metadata (for suggested spelling, see Thoth) is a platform for managing and distributing open-source metadata, initially developed as part of the Community-led Open Publication Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) project, a community-led initiative. In 2022, Thoth was registered as a nonprofit Community Interest Company in the UK [1].
Thoth Open Metadata platform is designed to meet the specific needs of university publishers and small to medium-sized publishers that release works in open access. Its development is based on open-source principles, with the code made publicly available and data accessible through open APIs. The metadata generated are made available under the CC0 license, allowing free and unrestricted use.
Thoth's objectives include:
Thoth operates on a non-profit model, offering its platform and API services for free to publishers, with the possibility of voluntary financial contributions through the Open Book Collective [2]. Additionally, it offers paid metadata management services through the Thoth Plus programme [3].
Thoth collaborates with various open access infrastructure organisations, such as Crossref [4], the OPERAS network [5], the OAPEN Foundation, and the DOAB Trusted Partner Network [6], among others.
It participates in the Open Book Futures project [7] and works with entities like the Public Knowledge Project, COKI, and SciELO Books to enhance the integration of metadata for open access books.
Recently launched as part of the COPIM project [8], this network aims to address preservation issues faced by small academic publishers. It includes initiatives to enable publishers to archive their publications in repositories such as the Internet Archive, Zenodo, DSpace, and Figshare [8], aiming to improve the preservation of important academic contributions.