Submission declined on 24 November 2023 by
MicrobiologyMarcus (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's
minimum standard for inline citations. Please
cite your sources using
footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see
Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 25 September 2023 by
Timtrent (
talk). I believe that Chandra is notable, but your references hinder acceptance and might trigger deletion of accepted.
For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Many of your references are articles (etc) by Chandra, and they are unlikely to be useful as references. Let me try to explain. If they manufactured vacuum cleaners, the cleaners would be their work. A vacuum cleaner could not be a reference for them, simply because it is the product they make. So it is with research, writings, etc. However, a review of their work by others tends to be a review of them and their methods, so is a reference, as is a peer reviewed paper a reference for their work.This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Timtrent 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 2 February 2023 by
Akevsharma (
talk). This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read
"What Wikipedia is not" for more information. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
Akevsharma 16 months ago. |
Submission declined on 27 September 2022 by
Greenman (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Greenman 20 months ago. |
Submission declined on 7 July 2022 by
DGG (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
DGG 22 months ago. |
Shailaja Chandra | |
---|---|
Born | citation needed] Bombay (Now Mumbai) | June 17, 1944 [
Nationality | Indian |
Occupation | Former IAS Officer |
Shailaja Dhumé Chandra is a former IAS ( Indian Administrative Service) officer and a former Secretary in the Union Government in the Ministry of Health, and, former Chief Secretary, Delhi, the first woman to hold this position. [1] At the state level, Shailaja Chandra was posted in Manipur, Goa and the Union Territories of Delhi and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
Shailaja Chandra was born at Bombay (British India), now Mumbai, in the Indian State of Maharashtra. Her mother, Lilla Wagle Dhume too was a civil servant in the Government of India. [2] Chandra pursued her B.A. (Honors) in English Literature from Miranda House, University of Delhi and completed her M.Sc. (Economics) from University of Wales, UK. [3][ non-primary source needed] She has been a Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Studies, Nantes, France (2012) [3][ non-primary source needed] and has been a Senior Visiting Fellow at Shiv Nadar University. [4] [3]
Shailaja Chandra was the Secretary of the Department of Indian Systems of Medicine & Homeopathy, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare from 1999 to 2002. [5] Following that, she held the position of the Chief Secretary, Delhi, until 2004. [1] On retirement she was appointed the Chairman of the Public Grievances Commission and Appellate Authority under the Delhi Right to Information Act. In 2006 she was appointed as the first Executive Director of the National Population Stabilization Fund, Government of India. She was a full time member of the Yamuna Monitoring Committee set up by the National Green Tribunal (2018- 2021). [6] [7] She has been there on the Boards of different companies in the Power, cement, Ayurveda, and hospital sectors. [8] [9] Her engagements span sectors like population, health, [10] [11] medical pluralism, governance, [12] and gender. [13] [14]
Shailaja Chandra was involved in developing India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library and in establishing National Medicinal Plants Board. [15] [16] [17] She has authored a report on the "Status of Indian Medicine and Folk Healing". [18] [19] [20] Another report she wrote is titled "Unqualified Medical Practitioners in India: The Legal, Medical and Social Dimensions of Their Practice". [21] Shailaja Chandra was the chairperson of the drafting committee of “The Report of the Review Committee on the Delhi school Education Act and Rules, 1973”. [22] She took initiatives to address the power and pollution situations in Delhi during her tenure. [23] [24] [25] She has also worked as Chairperson, CHETNA (an NGO) working in area of reproductive & child health and nutrition (2018 onward). [26]
Shailaja Chandra writes OpEd articles for national newspapers such as The Times of India. [27], Indian Express [28], The Print [29], The Quint [30], Economic and Political Weekly [31] and News-18 [32] [33]
{{
cite web}}
: |last=
has generic name (
help)