Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,315 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Anzor Alem ( talk:  + · bio) · ( log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search:  Google,  Bing,  Wikipedia) · Submitted 2 months ago by Mwashani ( talk:  D · +) · Last edited 6 seconds ago by Mwashani

Submission declined on 6 February 2024 by CoconutOctopus ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by CoconutOctopus 4 months ago. Last edited by Mwashani 6 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 21 December 2023 by Lewcm ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Lewcm 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 4 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Vanderwaalforces 7 months ago.

Submission declined on 14 June 2023 by Twinkle1990 ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Twinkle1990 12 months ago.

Submission declined on 25 February 2023 by Twinkle1990 ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Twinkle1990 15 months ago.

Submission declined on 15 November 2022 by S0091 ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by S0091 19 months ago.

Submission declined on 17 August 2022 by Praxidicae ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Praxidicae 21 months ago.

• Comment: Please add additional sources, reference 1, 6, 7, and 9 do not meet WP:SIGCOV. I was also unable to access some source 8 due to subscription and source 4 due the website not working so am unable to verify these. Lewcm Talk to me! 11:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: The previous reviewer gave you a bad advice. You can use interviews as a source for basic biographical details. But if the claims seem exaggerated, or the claim involves third parties, you should use an independent source. Ca ^{talk to me!} 07:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: Do not use interviews as source. Use reliable sources about the person. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 09:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: Remove ref 7. Add references to Filmography and Discography. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 02:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: The subject's birth name has been given in two different versions, both without sources. All statements need to be verified by a source, or removed. Greenman ( talk) 10:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: IMDb is not a reliable source. Theroadislong ( talk) 07:38, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Anzor Alem
Background information
Birth name	Rashidi Alema Anzor
Born	(2001-04-04) 4 April 2001 (age 23) Kisangani, Zaire (modern-day Democratic Republic of the Congo)
Genres	Afro pop, Afrobeats, trap
Occupation(s)	Singer, actor, songwriter
Years active	2015–present
Labels	Empire TBB
YouTube information
Channel	Anzor Alem
Years active	2018–present
Genres	Music [1] vlogging [1]
Subscribers	536  thousand [2]
Total views	179 million [2]
Last updated: June 8, 2024

Rashidi Alema Anzor( /ˈænzɔːr/ AEnz-o; born April 4, 2001) is a Congolese actor, musician and songwriter ^[3]. He is best known for the roles in the flms Baby Boy of House, Ima and Lucky. ^{[4] [5] [6] [7]}

After playing supporting roles in several feature films, including Beast and Ima, he got his first major role in the dramatic comedy Baby Boy of House that reveals him to the general public. In 2022, his role as a traveler "Clover tomas" Tozoom made him a recognized African actor. ^{[5] [8] [9] [10]}

Life and career

Rashidi Alema Anzor, known as Anzor Alem, is a Congolese artist born on April 4, 2001 in Kisangani. He is both a musician and an actor, and imposes himself as a rising figure on the Congolese scene. ^{[4] [11] [8]}

Childhood and artistic beginnings

From an early age, Anzor Alem was attracted to the arts, especially music and cinema. He began writing his own songs and practicing guitar as a teenager, revealing raw talent and undeniable artistic sensitivity. ^{[12] [13] [14]}

Musical career

In 2015, Anzor Alem officially launched into music. His melodious voice and poignant texts, imbued with emotions and lived stories, allow him to be quickly noticed by the Congolese public. He explores various musical genres, such as Afrobeat, rap and hip-hop, and is enjoying growing success. ^{[6] [14] [15]}

In 2023, he started writing two self-produced titles, broadcast on listening platforms. This opus confirms his talent and musical versatility. ^{[5] [16] [14] [15]}

Film career

Alongside music, Anzor Alem discovers a passion for cinema. His natural charisma and his ability to embody complex characters make him noticed by Congolese directors. ^[6]

In 2022, he got his first major role in the film "Tozoom". This social drama plunges him into the difficult reality of life in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, allowing him to demonstrate his talent as an actor and to reach the public with his poignant interpretation. ^[6]

The same year, he continued with two other films: "Baby Boy of House" by Mbala Mbalanda and "Ima" by Nils Tavernier. These roles allow him to explore different cinematographic genres, from social drama to psychological thriller, confirming his versatility and potential as an actor. ^{[8] [17]}

Discography

Singles

Filmography

References

External links

• Anzor Alem at IMDb
• Anzor Alem at AlloCiné (in French)
• Anzor Alem at AllMusic
• Anzor Alem at Rotten Tomatoes